IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13328-d944337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demand Response Transit Scheduling Research Based on Urban and Rural Transportation Station Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Peiqing Li

    (School of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Longlong Jiang

    (School of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Shunfeng Zhang

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 310058, China)

  • Xi Jiang

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 310058, China)

Abstract

To reduce the operating cost and running time of demand responsive transit between urban and rural areas, a DBSCAN K-means (DK-means) clustering algorithm, which is based on the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and K-means clustering algorithm, was proposed to cluster pre-processing and station optimization for passenger reservation demand and to design a new variable-route demand responsive transit service system that can promote urban–rural integration. Firstly, after preprocessing the reservation demand through DBSCAN clustering algorithm, K-means clustering algorithm was used to divide fixed sites and alternative sites. Then, a bus scheduling model was established, and a genetic simulated annealing algorithm was proposed to solve the model. Finally, the feasibility of the model was validated in the northern area of Yongcheng City, Henan Province, China. The results show that the optimized bus scheduling reduced the operating cost and running time by 9.5% and 9.0%, respectively, compared with those of the regional flexible bus, and 4.5% and 5.1%, respectively, compared with those of the variable-route demand response transit after K-means clustering for passenger preprocessing.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiqing Li & Longlong Jiang & Shunfeng Zhang & Xi Jiang, 2022. "Demand Response Transit Scheduling Research Based on Urban and Rural Transportation Station Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13328-:d:944337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fu Wang & Manqing Ye & Hongbin Zhu & Dengjun Gu, 2022. "Optimization Method for Conventional Bus Stop Placement and the Bus Line Network Based on the Voronoi Diagram," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Teodor Crainic & Fausto Errico & Federico Malucelli & Maddalena Nonato, 2012. "Designing the master schedule for demand-adaptive transit systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 151-166, April.
    3. Liu, Xiaohan & Qu, Xiaobo & Ma, Xiaolei, 2021. "Improving flex-route transit services with modular autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Chunqin Zhang & Yuting Hu & Anning Ni & Hongwei Li, 2019. "Compensation Scheme for Self-Employed Bus Service Requisitions in Urban–Rural Passenger Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Sergei Dytckov & Jan A. Persson & Fabian Lorig & Paul Davidsson, 2022. "Potential Benefits of Demand Responsive Transport in Rural Areas: A Simulation Study in Lolland, Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    6. A Pratelli & F Schoen, 2001. "A mathematical programming model for the bus deviation route problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(5), pages 494-502, May.
    7. Marco Diana & Luca Quadrifoglio & Cristina Pronello, 2009. "A methodology for comparing distances traveled by performance-equivalent fixed-route and demand responsive transit services," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 377-399, June.
    8. Yu, Yao & Machemehl, Randy B. & Xie, Chi, 2015. "Demand-responsive transit circulator service network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 160-175.
    9. Qing Yu & Weifeng Li & Haoran Zhang & Dongyuan Yang, 2020. "Mobile Phone Data in Urban Customized Bus: A Network-based Hierarchical Location Selection Method with an Application to System Layout Design in the Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Mohsen Momenitabar & Jeremy Mattson, 2021. "A Multi-Objective Meta-Heuristic Approach to Improve the Bus Transit Network: A Case Study of Fargo-Moorhead Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xudong Li & Zhongzhen Yang & Feng Lian, 2023. "Optimizing On-Demand Bus Services for Remote Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Yinfei Feng & Zhichao Cao & Silin Zhang, 2022. "Shuttle Bus Timetable Adjustment in Response to Behind-Schedule Commuter Railway Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Jun Zhao & Wenyu Rong & Di Liu, 2023. "Urban Agglomeration High-Speed Railway Backbone Network Planning: A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Yan, Yimo, 2023. "Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1001-1026.
    2. Xudong Li & Zhongzhen Yang & Feng Lian, 2023. "Optimizing On-Demand Bus Services for Remote Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Xuekai Cen & Kanghui Ren & Yiying Cai & Qun Chen, 2023. "Designing Flexible-Bus System with Ad-Hoc Service Using Travel-Demand Clustering," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Kim, Myungseob (Edward) & Schonfeld, Paul, 2015. "Maximizing net benefits for conventional and flexible bus services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 116-133.
    5. Lee, Enoch & Cen, Xuekai & Lo, Hong K., 2022. "Scheduling zonal-based flexible bus service under dynamic stochastic demand and Time-dependent travel time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Muhammad Riaz & Aamir Hanif & Haris Masood & Muhammad Attique Khan & Kamran Afaq & Byeong-Gwon Kang & Yunyoung Nam, 2021. "An Optimal Power Flow Solution of a System Integrated with Renewable Sources Using a Hybrid Optimizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Zhang, Jiyu & Ge, Ying-En & Tang, Chunyan & Zhong, Meisu, 2024. "Optimising modular-autonomous-vehicle transit service employing coupling–decoupling operations plus skip-stop strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Hatzenbühler, Jonas & Jenelius, Erik & Gidófalvi, Gyözö & Cats, Oded, 2023. "Modular vehicle routing for combined passenger and freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Zahra Navidi & Nicole Ronald & Stephan Winter, 2018. "Comparison between ad-hoc demand responsive and conventional transit: a simulation study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 147-167, May.
    10. Jiayi Li & Zhaocheng He & Jiaming Zhong, 2022. "The Multi-Type Demands Oriented Framework for Flex-Route Transit Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Badia, Hugo & Jenelius, Erik, 2021. "Design and operation of feeder systems in the era of automated and electric buses," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 146-172.
    12. Sehyun Tak & Soomin Woo & Sungjin Park & Sunghoon Kim, 2021. "The City-Wide Impacts of the Interactions between Shared Autonomous Vehicle-Based Mobility Services and the Public Transportation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, June.
    13. Zheng, Hankun & Sun, Huijun & Kang, Liujiang & Dai, Peiling & Wu, Jianjun, 2023. "Multi-route coordination for bus systems in response to road disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Nithin Isaac & Akshay K. Saha, 2023. "A Review of the Optimization Strategies and Methods Used to Locate Hydrogen Fuel Refueling Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Berrada, Jaâfar & Poulhès, Alexis, 2021. "Economic and socioeconomic assessment of replacing conventional public transit with demand responsive transit services in low-to-medium density areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 317-334.
    16. Li, Qianwen & Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Trajectory planning for autonomous modular vehicle docking and autonomous vehicle platooning operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Yang, Hongtai & Luo, Peng & Li, Chaojing & Zhai, Guocong & Yeh, Anthony G.O., 2023. "Nonlinear effects of fare discounts and built environment on ridesplitting adoption rates," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Vikneswari Someetheram & Muhammad Fadhil Marsani & Mohd Shareduwan Mohd Kasihmuddin & Nur Ezlin Zamri & Siti Syatirah Muhammad Sidik & Siti Zulaikha Mohd Jamaludin & Mohd. Asyraf Mansor, 2022. "Random Maximum 2 Satisfiability Logic in Discrete Hopfield Neural Network Incorporating Improved Election Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-29, December.
    19. Obiora A. Nnene & Johan W. Joubert & Mark H. P. Zuidgeest, 2023. "A simulation-based optimization approach for designing transit networks," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 377-409, June.
    20. GALARZA MONTENEGRO, Bryan David & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & VANSTEENWEGEN, Pieter, 2023. "A demand-responsive feeder service with a maximum headway at mandatory stops," Working Papers 2023001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13328-:d:944337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.