IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/bmr111/v1y2012i2p125-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Action Research on Blended Learning Transformative Potential in Higher Education- Learners¡¯ Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Hisham Dzakiria
  • Mohd Sobri Don A.Wahab
  • Hamzah Dato¡¯ Abdul Rahman

Abstract

This article reports on action research on Blended learning approach conducted in 2011. The goal of the research was to investigate students¡¯ perspectives towards blended approach (hybrid) in teaching Business Communication as the learner progresses through their Executive program at Executive Development Centre, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Results indicated that students were in favor of BL. Students felt they learned as much or more than they did in traditional method of teaching and learning, were more motivated, and preferred hybrid courses over traditional ones. Specifically, the research finding suggests that BL has the potential of enhancing learning interactivity and minimizes the sense of isolation amongst the learners. The authors found that students felt a greater sense of belonging in those courses that used synchronous communication, although they enjoyed the flexibility of asynchronous communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisham Dzakiria & Mohd Sobri Don A.Wahab & Hamzah Dato¡¯ Abdul Rahman, 2012. "Action Research on Blended Learning Transformative Potential in Higher Education- Learners¡¯ Perspectives," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(2), pages 125-134, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:125-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/download/1310/677
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/view/1310
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muharman Lubis & Muhammad Azani Hasibuan & Rachmadita Andreswari, 2022. "Satisfaction Measurement in the Blended Learning System of the University: The Literacy Mediated-Discourses (LM-D) Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kien Le, 2022. "Pre-Recorded Lectures, Live Online Lectures, and Student Academic Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Paul Wells & Paul De Lange & Peter Fieger, 2008. "Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second‐year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 503-518, September.
    3. Mardini, Ghassan H. & Mah'd, Osama A., 2022. "Distance learning as emergency remote teaching vs. traditional learning for accounting students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-country evidence," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Vincent Bicudo de Castro & Bhavani Sridharan & Kim Watty & Maryam Safari, 2021. "The impact of learner engagement on performance outcomes: a longitudinal study in accounting education," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1639-1664, April.
    5. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:125-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://bmr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.