IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12475-d930421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Emerging Technologies to the Increasing of Corporate Sustainability in Shipping Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Wagner

    (Faculty of Economics and Transport Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, H. Pobożnego 11, 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Bogusz Wiśnicki

    (Faculty of Economics and Transport Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, H. Pobożnego 11, 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Corporate sustainability is understood as the integration of economic, environmental, and social considerations into the company’s mission. In the shipping market, it allows for a wide spectrum of integration of corporate management areas: shipowners’ financial condition, environmental protection, work safety, seafarers’ health, and stable cooperation with shippers. The aim of this paper is to create a deeper understanding of how and which emerging technologies accelerate sustainability strategy of shipping companies. Three research perspectives have been adopted. The first one is aimed to examine shipowners’ approach to emerging technologies as a tool to improve their corporate sustainability performance. The second perspective gives a view of trends in the development of emerging technologies in shipping and how they related to sustainability. Taking the third perspective, we examine how effective, in the opinion of future seafarers, the use of emerging technologies is in improving corporate sustainability of shipping companies. The research methods for each of the perspectives are, respectively, a sustainability reports and ships’ registry data analysis, a patent analysis, and a questionnaire survey analysis. The results prove that shipowners use not only certain management practices, but also new technologies to enhance corporate sustainability. The transition to sustainable shipping will continue for many years to come and all shipping companies will have to become part of it.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Wagner & Bogusz Wiśnicki, 2022. "The Importance of Emerging Technologies to the Increasing of Corporate Sustainability in Shipping Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12475-:d:930421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12475/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12475/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatih Özcan & Meral Elçi, 2020. "Employees’ Perception of CSR Affecting Employer Brand, Brand Image, and Corporate Reputation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    2. Young-Tae Chang & Denise Danao, 2017. "Green Shipping Practices of Shipping Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Qinghua Zhu & Fei Zou & Pan Zhang, 2019. "The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium‐sized suppliers in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 341-350, March.
    4. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Li, Kevin X. & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Shipping industry's sustainability communications to public in social media: A longitudinal analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 123-134.
    5. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale & Maria Lekakou & Evangelia Stefanidaki, 2021. "Cruise and container shipping companies: a comparative analysis of sustainable development goals through environmental sustainability disclosure," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 184-212, February.
    6. Barbro Elisabeth Fjørtoft & Siv Marina Flø Grimstad & Richard Glavee-Geo, 2020. "Motivations for CSR in the Norwegian maritime cluster: stakeholder perspectives and policy implications," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1010-1026, November.
    7. Drobetz, Wolfgang & Merikas, Andreas & Merika, Anna & Tsionas, Mike G., 2014. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of international shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 18-44.
    8. Ker-Tah Hsu, 2012. "The Advertising Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Reputation and Brand Equity: Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 189-201, August.
    9. Youngran Shin & Vinh V. Thai, 2015. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Satisfaction, Relationship Maintenance and Loyalty in the Shipping Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 381-392, November.
    10. Lijun Tang & Victor Gekara, 2020. "The Importance of Customer Expectations: An Analysis of CSR in Container Shipping," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 383-393, September.
    11. Jose Benitez & Laura Ruiz & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-02462583, HAL.
    12. Pratima Bansal, 2005. "Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 197-218, March.
    13. Park, Yongtae & Yoon, Byungun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2005. "The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: patent citation analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 471-485.
    14. Gao, Lidan & Porter, Alan L. & Wang, Jing & Fang, Shu & Zhang, Xian & Ma, Tingting & Wang, Wenping & Huang, Lu, 2013. "Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 398-407.
    15. Jason Monios & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2020. "Deep adaptation to climate change in the maritime transport sector – a new paradigm for maritime economics?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 853-872, October.
    16. Mehrnaz Ashrafi & Gregory M. Magnan & Michelle Adams & Tony R. Walker, 2020. "Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Michelle Wallace & Neroli Sheldon, 2014. "Women and Engineering: A Workforce Development Issue," Springer Books, in: Roger Harris & Tom Short (ed.), Workforce Development, edition 127, chapter 7, pages 113-129, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur J. Lin & Hai-Yen Chang & Brian Hung, 2022. "Identifying Key Financial, Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG), Bond, and COVID-19 Factors Affecting Global Shipping Companies—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Chua, Jie Ying & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Sustainable shipping management: Definitions, critical success factors, drivers and performance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 72-82.
    3. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Ma, Fei, 2019. "A contingency view of the effects of sustainable shipping exploitation and exploration on business performance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 90-103.
    4. Samer Ajour El Zein & Carolina Consolacion-Segura & Ruben Huertas-Garcia, 2019. "The Role of Sustainability in Brand Equity Value in the Financial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Li, Kevin X., 2020. "The role of stakeholder participation and sustainability integration in maritime transport: A structure-conduct-performance analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 44-53.
    6. Faisal Mahmood & Faisal Qadeer & Usman Sattar & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Maria Saleem & Jaffar Aman, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms’ Financial Performance: A New Insight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Yuen, Kum Fai & Thai, Vinh V. & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2016. "The effect of continuous improvement capacity on the relationship between of corporate social performance and business performance in maritime transport in Singapore," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 62-75.
    8. Nour Chams & Josep García-Blandón & Khaled Hassan, 2021. "Role Reversal! Financial Performance as an Antecedent of ESG: The Moderating Effect of Total Quality Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Koopo Kwon & Jaeryong So, 2023. "Future Smart Logistics Technology Based on Patent Analysis Using Temporal Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Noh, Heeyong & Song, Young-Keun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2016. "Identifying emerging core technologies for the future: Case study of patents published by leading telecommunication organizations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 956-970.
    11. Natalia Wagner, 2023. "Inventive Activity for Climate Change Mitigation: An Insight into the Maritime Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Xin Pan & Paresha Sinha & Xuanjin Chen, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and eco‐innovation: The triple bottom line perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 214-228, January.
    13. Yuen, Kum Fai & Thai, Vinh V. & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2018. "An investigation of shippers’ satisfaction and behaviour towards corporate social responsibility in maritime transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 275-289.
    14. Xiaobo Wang & Zhishan An & Caixia Zhang, 2023. "Identifying Crucial Attributes of Sustainable Operation for Scientific Instrument Platforms With a Fuzzy Synthetic Cause-Effect Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    15. Efstathios Dimitriadis & Eleni Zilakaki, 2019. "The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty in Mobile Telephone Companies," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 433-450.
    16. Yuen, Kum Fai & Li, Kevin X. & Xu, Gangyan & Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2019. "A taxonomy of resources for sustainable shipping management: Their interrelationships and effects on business performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 316-332.
    17. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Zhou, Qingji, 2018. "The effect of sustainable shipping practices on shippers’ loyalty: The mediating role of perceived value, trust and transaction cost," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 123-135.
    18. Mei Feng & Chu Chen & Jia Liu & Wei Jia, 2022. "Does Central Environmental Protection Inspector Improve Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Xue, Yuemei & Lai, Kee-hung, 2023. "Responsible shipping for sustainable development: Adoption and performance value," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 89-99.
    20. Arnold Pabian & Barbara Pabian, 2023. "Role of Social Media in Managing Knowledge of the Young Generation in the Sustainability Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12475-:d:930421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.