IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11477-d913876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sources of Intellectual Capital Acquisition

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Sierotowicz

    (Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, 31-007 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Research related to intellectual capital (IC) concerns its use and impact on the selected results achieved by enterprises. IC is analysed as a single stream of enterprises’ internal resources. Since IC is used in the business activities of enterprises, it must also be acquired. However, research conducted so far does not cover the area of IC acquisition. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of research undertaken in a relatively new area of IC acquisition that has not been scientifically explored over a research period of several years. The research covered innovative small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that were developing software in Poland from 2005 to 2019. The data series allowed the use of dedicated analysis tools, including the dynamic changes over time, multidimensional comparison and cluster analysis. The primary conclusions revealed that the acquisition of IC is a process that takes place simultaneously and continuously in two independent streams—internal and external—and that the external sources of IC were more important for SMEs covered by the research. Continued research will allow comparative analyses between various branches or sectors of the economy to bring new knowledge about the importance of IC to the business activities of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Sierotowicz, 2022. "Sources of Intellectual Capital Acquisition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11477-:d:913876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11477/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11477/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dongwoo Ryu & Kwang Ho Baek & Junghyun Yoon, 2021. "Open Innovation with Relational Capital, Technological Innovation Capital, and International Performance in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Gadaf Rexhepi & Robert D. Hisrich & Veland Ramadani (ed.), 2019. "Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-16912-1, December.
    3. José Vale & Rafaela Miranda & Graça Azevedo & Maria C. Tavares, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Intellectual Capital on Sustainable Performance: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Tharwa Najar & Karima Dhaouadi & Ibticem Ben Zammel, 2020. "Intellectual Capital Impact on Open Innovation: The Case of Technology-Based Sectors in Tunisia," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 75-106.
    5. Barbara Barbieri & Ilaria Buonomo & Maria Luisa Farnese & Paula Benevene, 2021. "Organizational Capital: A Resource for Changing and Performing in Public Administrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Florinda Matos & Valter Vairinhos & Radu Godina, 2020. "Reporting of Intellectual Capital Management Using a Scoring Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Ebes Esho & Grietjie Verhoef, 2020. "A holistic model of human capital for value creation and superior firm performance: The Strategic factor market model," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1728998-172, January.
    8. Zainab M. Aljuboori & Harcharanjit Singh & Hossam Haddad & Nidal Mahmoud Al-Ramahi & Mostafa A. Ali, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance Correlation: The Mediation Role of Innovation Capability in Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Raymond Van Wijk & Justin J. P. Jansen & Marjorie A. Lyles, 2008. "Inter‐ and Intra‐Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 830-853, June.
    10. Harm-Jan Steenhuis & Erik J. De Bruijn, 2012. "Technology And Economic Development: A Literature Review," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(05), pages 1-11.
    11. Wilder Quintero-Quintero & Ana Beatriz Blanco-Ariza & Manuel Alfonso Garzón-Castrillón, 2021. "Intellectual Capital: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Indra Abeysekera, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management Research towards Value Creation. From the Past to the Future," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Serena Santis & Michela Bianchi & Alberto Incollingo & Marco Bisogno, 2018. "Disclosure of Intellectual Capital Components in Integrated Reporting: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Jane Boeske & Peter A. Murray, 2022. "The Intellectual Domains of Sustainability Leadership in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Qianwei Ying & Hazrat Hassan & Habib Ahmad, 2019. "The Role of a Manager’s Intangible Capabilities in Resource Acquisition and Sustainable Competitive Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Johannessen, Jon-Arild & Olsen, Bjørn & Olaisen, Johan, 2005. "Intellectual capital as a holistic management philosophy: a theoretical perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 151-171.
    17. Qing’e Wang & Luwei Zhao & Alice Chang-Richards & Yuanyuan Zhang & Hujun Li, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Social Capital on the Innovation Performance of Construction Enterprises: Based on the Mediating Effect of Knowledge Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Li Zhang & Jiafure Wang, 2018. "Research on the relationship between relational capital and relational rent," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1431091-143, January.
    19. Mark Easterby‐Smith & Marjorie A. Lyles & Eric W. K. Tsang, 2008. "Inter‐Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 677-690, June.
    20. Nile W. Hatch & Jeffrey H. Dyer, 2004. "Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(12), pages 1155-1178, December.
    21. Sunarti Halid & Huang Ching Choo & Kalsom Salleh, 2018. "Intellectual Capital Management: Pathways to Sustainable Competitive Advantage," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 1103-1119, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Kański & Jan Chadam & Grzegorz Kłosowski, 2022. "Intellectual Capital: A New Predictive Indicator for Project Management Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Łukasz Kański & Jan Chadam & Grzegorz Kłosowski, 2022. "Intellectual Capital: A New Predictive Indicator for Project Management Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Epede, Mesumbe Bianca & Wang, Daoping, 2022. "Global value chain linkages: An integrative review of the opportunities and challenges for SMEs in developing countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    3. Bertermann, Britta & Virgillito, Alfredo & Naegele, Gerhard & Wilkesmann, Uwe, 2015. "Werkzeugkasten Wissenstransfer: Entwicklung einer praktischen Handlungshilfe für Betriebs- und Personalräte," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 291, March.
    4. Ho, Mia Hsiao-Wen & Wang, Fatima, 2015. "Unpacking knowledge transfer and learning paradoxes in international strategic alliances: Contextual differences matter," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 287-297.
    5. Demeter, Krisztina & Szász, Levente & Rácz, Béla-Gergely, 2016. "The impact of subsidiaries’ internal and external integration on operational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-85.
    6. Sajjad Jasimuddin & Jun Li & Nicholas Perdikis, 2015. "Linkage between geographic space and knowledge transfer by multinational enterprises: a structural equation approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 769-795, May.
    7. Stefano Ghinoi & Riccardo Vita & Bodo Steiner & Alessandro Sinatra, 2024. "Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: evidence from Italy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 87-103, January.
    8. Mohamed Bouteraa & Elhachemi Tamma & Mohammed El Hafedh Aichouche & Sadok Achour & Suddin Lada & Rudy Ansar & Lim Ming Fook & Brahim Chekima, 2023. "International Joint Ventures’ Knowledge Acquisition: Critical Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Noel Lindsay & Wendy Lindsay & Janice Jones, 2019. "Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 145-164, June.
    10. José A. Belso-Martínez, 2015. "Resources, Governance, and Knowledge Transfer in Spanish Footwear Clusters," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 38(2), pages 202-231, April.
    11. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    12. Blind, Knut & Mangelsdorf, Axel, 2016. "Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 48, pages 13-24.
    13. Nilsson, Magnus & Mattes, Jannika, 2015. "The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 230-244.
    14. Daegyu Yang, 2019. "What Should SMEs Consider to Introduce Environmentally Innovative Products to Market?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Rafał Prusak & Edyta Kardas, 2024. "The Analysis of Mutual Relations and Dependencies of Intellectual Capital Components in Polish Enterprises in the Context of Sustainability Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Zihanxin Li & Guilong Zhu, 2021. "Knowledge Transfer Performance of Industry-University-Research Institute Collaboration in China: The Moderating Effect of Partner Difference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Nielsen, Bo Bernhard, 2010. "Strategic fit, contractual, and procedural governance in alliances," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 682-689, July.
    18. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    19. Lefebvre, Virginie Marie & Sorenson, Douglas & Henchion, Maeve & Gellynck, Xavier, 2016. "Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 570-579.
    20. Allen, April D. & Hyde, Justeen & Leslie, Laurel K., 2012. "“I Don't Know What They Know”: Knowledge transfer in mandated referral from child welfare to early intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1050-1059.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    O34 Open Intellectual Capital; O30 Intellectual Capital Acquisition; L25 Empirical Analysis of open intellectual capital acquisition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11477-:d:913876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.