IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11131-d907816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment of Coal Mine Flood Disasters Based on Projection Pursuit Clustering Model

Author

Listed:
  • Zuo Sun

    (Emergency Science Research Institute, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China
    School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yingjie Liu

    (Emergency Science Research Institute, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Qingjie Qi

    (Emergency Science Research Institute, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Wengang Liu

    (Emergency Science Research Institute, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Dan Li

    (Emergency Science Research Institute, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Jiamei Chai

    (Emergency Science Research Institute, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China)

Abstract

Previously conducted studies have established that as a disaster-bearing body, a coal mine is vulnerable to flood disasters and their consequent impacts. The purpose of this study is to put forward a quantitative evaluation method of the risk of coal mine flood disaster. Based on the scientific theory of disaster risk, a risk assessment model and index system for coal mine flood disaster was constructed, and a risk assessment method was proposed based on the projection pursuit and fuzzy cluster analysis. The results show that the risk of coal mine flood disaster was mainly determined by the hazard of disaster-causing factors, the stability of the disaster-prone environment, and the vulnerability of disaster-bearing bodies. Further research shows that the maximum daily rainfall had the greatest impact the risk of coal mine flood disaster. Therefore, the early warning mechanism should be established between the coal mine and the meteorological department to improve the fortification level. A risk assessment method of coal mine flood disaster was proposed in this study, which is of great significance for energy sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuo Sun & Yingjie Liu & Qingjie Qi & Wengang Liu & Dan Li & Jiamei Chai, 2022. "Risk Assessment of Coal Mine Flood Disasters Based on Projection Pursuit Clustering Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11131-:d:907816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Maria Cruz & Laura J. Steinberg & Ana Lisa Vetere-Arellano, 2006. "Emerging Issues for Natech Disaster Risk Management in Europe," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(5), pages 483-501, July.
    2. Andrei Shalikovskiy & Konstantin Kurganovich, 2017. "Flood hazard and risk assessment in Russia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 133-147, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zuo Sun & Qingjie Qi & Yingjie Liu, 2022. "Vulnerability Assessment of Mine Flooding Disaster Induced by Rainstorm Based on Tri-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Cruz & Elisabeth Krausmann, 2013. "Vulnerability of the oil and gas sector to climate change and extreme weather events," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 41-53, November.
    2. Elisabeth Krausmann & Fesil Mushtaq, 2008. "A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 46(2), pages 179-197, August.
    3. Landucci, Gabriele & Necci, Amos & Antonioni, Giacomo & Tugnoli, Alessandro & Cozzani, Valerio, 2014. "Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 125-145.
    4. Marzo, E. & Busini, V. & Rota, R., 2015. "Definition of a short-cut methodology for assessing the vulnerability of a territory in natural–technological risk estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 92-97.
    5. Schenker-Wicki, Andrea & Inauen, Matthias & Olivares, Maria, 2010. "Unmastered risks: From crisis to catastrophe: An economic and management insight," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 337-346, April.
    6. Tiezhong Liu & Hubo Zhang & Xiaowei Li & Haiyan Li, 2017. "Effects of organization factors on flood-related Natechs in urban areas of China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 355-365, August.
    7. Misuri, Alessio & Landucci, Gabriele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2020. "Assessment of safety barrier performance in Natech scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. José Carlos de Moura Xavier & Wilson Cabral Sousa Junior, 2016. "Recognising na-tech events in Brazil: moving forward," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 493-506, May.
    9. C. Negulescu & F. Smai & R. Quique & A. Hohmann & U. Clain & R. Guidez & A. Tellez-Arenas & A. Quentin & G. Grandjean, 2023. "VIGIRISKS platform, a web-tool for single and multi-hazard risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 593-618, January.
    10. Landucci, Gabriele & Antonioni, Giacomo & Tugnoli, Alessandro & Cozzani, Valerio, 2012. "Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for atmospheric storage tanks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 200-216.
    11. Misuri, Alessio & Casson Moreno, Valeria & Quddus, Noor & Cozzani, Valerio, 2019. "Lessons learnt from the impact of hurricane Harvey on the chemical and process industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Ana Cruz & Norio Okada, 2008. "Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of industrial facilities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 44(2), pages 213-227, February.
    13. Antonioni, Giacomo & Landucci, Gabriele & Necci, Amos & Gheorghiu, Diana & Cozzani, Valerio, 2015. "Quantitative assessment of risk due to NaTech scenarios caused by floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 334-345.
    14. Ricci, Federica & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik & Cozzani, Valerio, 2024. "Emergency response in cascading scenarios triggered by natural events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11131-:d:907816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.