IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10926-d904583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are There Differences in Thermal Comfort Perception of Children in Comparison to Their Caregivers’ Judgments? A Study on the Playgrounds of Parks in China’s Hot Summer and Cold Winter Region

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaojiao Qi

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    School of Design, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China)

  • Jiangping Wang

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Wenya Zhai

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Jingyong Wang

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Ziliang Jin

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Playgrounds in urban parks are important for children’s physical and mental health, but global warming has led to a worsening outdoor environment and children’s outdoor activities have been affected. Improving the outdoor thermal comfort (OTC) of playgrounds can encourage children to engage in more and safer outdoor activities. However, there are a limited number of studies focusing on preschoolers’ outdoor thermal comfort (OTC) and most of them have substituted children’s thermal comfort with caregivers’ evaluations. To investigate the differences between children’s and caregivers’ evaluations of thermal sensation, thermal benchmarks and thermal adaptive behavior for children, we conducted meteorological measurements on representative playgrounds in three parks in Wuhan, China, and administered thermal perception questionnaires to preschool children and their caregivers. In addition, the Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) was used to establish evaluation criteria for children’s OTC and to make recommendations for the improvement of the playground environment. We draw five conclusions by analyzing 719 valid questionnaires: (1) Children were less sensitive to changes in meteorological factors than caregivers and had better tolerance of cold environments. (2) The NPET for preschoolers was evaluated by children and by caregivers, respectively, as 22.9 °C and 22.3 °C in summer and 10.6 °C and 11.2 °C in winter. (3) Playgrounds in Wuhan’s parks are uncomfortable for a long time in summer and a short time in winter. (4) Both children and caregivers want to improve summer comfort by lowering the temperature and winter comfort by increasing solar radiation. At the same time, children and caregivers show different preferences in adaptive behavior choices. (5) Adding deciduous trees and water play facilities can improve the site thermal environment. Furthermore, the OTC of humans can be improved by adding more service facilities on playgrounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaojiao Qi & Jiangping Wang & Wenya Zhai & Jingyong Wang & Ziliang Jin, 2022. "Are There Differences in Thermal Comfort Perception of Children in Comparison to Their Caregivers’ Judgments? A Study on the Playgrounds of Parks in China’s Hot Summer and Cold Winter Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10926-:d:904583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kun Li & Xuefei Li & Keji Yao, 2022. "Outdoor Thermal Environments of Main Types of Urban Areas during Summer: A Field Study in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Mehdi Makvandi & Xilin Zhou & Chuancheng Li & Qinli Deng, 2021. "A Field Investigation on Adaptive Thermal Comfort in an Urban Environment Considering Individuals’ Psychological and Physiological Behaviors in a Cold-Winter of Wuhan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Mark S. Tremblay & Casey Gray & Shawna Babcock & Joel Barnes & Christa Costas Bradstreet & Dawn Carr & Guylaine Chabot & Louise Choquette & David Chorney & Cam Collyer & Susan Herrington & Katherine J, 2015. "Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janet Loebach & Marcos Sanches & Julia Jaffe & Tara Elton-Marshall, 2021. "Paving the Way for Outdoor Play: Examining Socio-Environmental Barriers to Community-Based Outdoor Play," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Ghada Elshafei & Silvia Vilcekova & Martina Zelenakova & Abdelazim M. Negm, 2021. "Towards an Adaptation of Efficient Passive Design for Thermal Comfort Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Christopher Lim & Andrew M. Donovan & Nevin J. Harper & Patti-Jean Naylor, 2017. "Nature Elements and Fundamental Motor Skill Development Opportunities at Five Elementary School Districts in British Columbia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-9, October.
    4. Liang Qiao & Xinling Yan, 2022. "Analysis of Thermal Comfort under Different Exercise Modes in Winter in Universities in Severe Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Òscar Flores & Anabel Ramos-Pla & Isabel del Arco, 2022. "The Management of Safety Situations and Assumable Risk during Transitions and Recesses in Different Types of Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Jeff Mann & Tonia Gray & Son Truong & Pasi Sahlberg & Peter Bentsen & Rowena Passy & Susanna Ho & Kumara Ward & Rachel Cowper, 2021. "A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Efficacy of Nature-Based Learning in Outdoor Educational Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Anne Kerstin Reimers & Stephanie Schoeppe & Yolanda Demetriou & Guido Knapp, 2018. "Physical Activity and Outdoor Play of Children in Public Playgrounds—Do Gender and Social Environment Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Hilary A. T. Caldwell & Joshua Yusuf & Mike Arthur & Camille L. Hancock Friesen & Sara F. L. Kirk, 2022. "Play-Friendly Communities in Nova Scotia, Canada: A Content Analysis of Physical Activity and Active Transportation Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Laura E. Smith & Veronique Gosselin & Patricia Collins & Katherine L. Frohlich, 2022. "A Tale of Two Cities: Unpacking the Success and Failure of School Street Interventions in Two Canadian Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Josephine Y. Chau & Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani & Helen Little, 2023. "Navigating Neighbourhood Opposition and Climate Change: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Play Street Pilot in Sydney, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    11. Richard Larouche & Madeline Kleinfeld & Ulises Charles Rodriguez & Cheryl Hatten & Victoria Hecker & David R. Scott & Leanna Marie Brown & Ogochukwu K. Onyeso & Farzana Sadia & Hanako Shimamura, 2023. "Determinants of Outdoor Time in Children and Youth: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal and Intervention Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-33, January.
    12. Yuqing Shu & Kang Zou & Guie Li & Qingwu Yan & Siyu Zhang & Wenhao Zhang & Yuqing Liang & Wenzhou Xu, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Thermal Comfort and Its Relationship with Land Use/Land Cover Change: A Case Study of Three Urban Agglomerations, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Oliver Traynor & Paul McCrorie & Nai Rui Chng & Anne Martin, 2022. "Evaluating Outdoor Nature-Based Early Learning and Childcare Provision for Children Aged 3 Years: Protocol of a Feasibility and Pilot Quasi-Experimental Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10926-:d:904583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.