IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8582-d861982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Support for Neighborhood Regeneration: A Case Study of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Doil Kim

    (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Kabsung Kim

    (Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between financial support and neighborhood regeneration in Korea. A questionnaire about neighborhood regeneration projects was administered to 175 Korean respondents in the regeneration field. Results found that the housing revitalization project needed more public funds than private funds for successful outcomes. The private sector participation project required public-private cooperation. The local economy vitalization project needed public funds to build infrastructure. The local living improvement project needed public funds for infrastructure. The local living network project could be led by public funds including the facility fund. The local economy operation project required public and private funds for local programs and facility support. The results offer the optimization of financial support efficiency by providing customized support funds for neighborhood regeneration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Doil Kim & Kabsung Kim, 2022. "Financial Support for Neighborhood Regeneration: A Case Study of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8582-:d:861982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8582/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8582/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorna Dargan, 2009. "Participation and Local Urban Regeneration: The Case of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 305-317.
    2. Hyun Woo Kim & Dakota Aaron McCarty & Jaekyung Lee, 2020. "Enhancing Sustainable Urban Regeneration through Smart Technologies: An Assessment of Local Urban Regeneration Strategic Plans in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Luke Boyle & Kathy Michell & François Viruly, 2018. "A Critique of the Application of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools in Urban Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Stanley McGreal & Alastair Adair & Jim Berry & Bill Deddis & Suzanne Hirst, 2000. "Accessing private sector finance in urban regeneration: investor and non-investor perspectives," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 109-131, January.
    5. Lucia Della Spina, 2019. "Multidimensional Assessment for “Culture-Led” and “Community-Driven” Urban Regeneration as Driver for Trigger Economic Vitality in Urban Historic Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Jin Hui Lee & Sangyon Lim, 2018. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Sustainable Assessment of Economy-Based and Community-Based Urban Regeneration: The Case of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Edeltraud Haselsteiner & Blerta Vula Rizvanolli & Paola Villoria Sáez & Odysseas Kontovourkis, 2021. "Drivers and Barriers Leading to a Successful Paradigm Shift toward Regenerative Neighborhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunxi Bai & Shanshan Wu & Yunjie Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Key Factors Influencing Sustainable Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Eun Ji Lee & Sung Jun Park, 2021. "Toward the Biophilic Residential Regeneration for the Green New Deal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Xiang Li & Sun Sheng Han & Hao Wu, 2019. "Urban consolidation, power relations, and dilapidated residential redevelopment in Mutoulong, Shenzhen, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2802-2819, October.
    4. Eunae Jin & Woojong Lee & Danya Kim, 2018. "Does Resident Participation in an Urban Regeneration Project Improve Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Case Study of “Amichojang” in Busan, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Carmela Gargiulo & Antonio Sforza & Claudio Sterle & Floriana Zucaro, 2018. "An Optimization Model Fitting the Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Joo Young Kim & Jung Hoon Kim, 2022. "Urban Regeneration Involving Communication between University Students and Residents: A Case Study on the Student Village Design Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Henrique Sala Benites & Paul Osmond & Deo Prasad, 2022. "A Future-Proof Built Environment through Regenerative and Circular Lenses—Delphi Approach for Criteria Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, December.
    9. Marie-Hélène Bacqué & Carole Biewener, 2013. "Different Manifestations of the Concept of Empowerment: The Politics of Urban Renewal in the United States and the United Kingdom," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2198-2213, November.
    10. Å pela VerovÅ¡ek & Tadeja ZupanÄ iÄ & Matevž JuvanÄ iÄ & Simon PetrovÄ iÄ & Matija Svetina & Miha Janež & Žiga PuÅ¡nik & Iztok Lebar Bajec & Miha MoÅ¡kon, 2021. "The Aspect of Mobility and Connectivity While Assessing the Neighbourhood Sustainability," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, May.
    11. Alvanchi, Amin & Jafari, Mohammad Amin & Shabanlou, Mohammad & Meghdadi, Zeinab, 2021. "A novel public-private-people partnership framework in regeneration of old urban neighborhoods in Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Ema Alihodžić Jašarović & Svetlana Perović & Sanja Paunović Žarić, 2021. "Impacts of Arsenal Brownfield Regeneration on Urban Development of Tivat in Montenegro: From Industrial Settlement to Center of Nautical Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-34, July.
    13. Yekeun Oh & Sanghyo Lee & Jaejun Kim, 2013. "Characteristics of design change in urban regeneration project in Korea," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 4(5), pages 105-112.
    14. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2018. "From Culture 1.0 to Culture 3.0: Three Socio-Technical Regimes of Social and Economic Value Creation through Culture, and Their Impact on European Cohesion Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Yang Tang & Yongbo Yuan & Boquan Tian, 2023. "Analysis of the Driving Mechanism of Land Comprehensive Carrying Capacity from the Perspective of Urban Renewal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Jesper Ole Jensen & Jacob Norvig Larsen & Kresten Storgaard, 2011. "Generating private co-investments in area-based urban regeneration: Lessons from Denmark," ERES eres2011_343, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    17. Zachary Christman & Mahbubur Meenar & Lynn Mandarano & Kyle Hearing, 2018. "Prioritizing Suitable Locations for Green Stormwater Infrastructure Based on Social Factors in Philadelphia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Kaijian Li & Ruopeng Huang & Guiwen Liu & Asheem Shrestha & Xinyue Fu, 2022. "Social Capital in Neighbourhood Renewal: A Holistic and State of the Art Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    19. Mateusz Hämmerling & Joanna Kocięcka & Stanisław Zaborowski, 2021. "AHP as a Useful Tool in the Assessment of the Technical Condition of Hydrotechnical Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    20. Vida Maliene & Natalie Durney-Knight & Begum Sertyesilisik & Naglis Malys, 2012. "Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Sustainable Communities in the North West of England," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8582-:d:861982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.