IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8359-d858231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting the Adoption of IoT-Based Smart Campus: An Investigation Using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)

Author

Listed:
  • Radhwan Sneesl

    (Department of Software Engineering and Information System, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    College of Science, University of Basrah, Basrah 61001, Iraq
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yusmadi Yah Jusoh

    (Department of Software Engineering and Information System, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Marzanah A. Jabar

    (Department of Software Engineering and Information System, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Salfarina Abdullah

    (Department of Software Engineering and Information System, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Umar Ali Bukar

    (Department of Software Engineering and Information System, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    Computer Science Unit, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Taraba State University, Jalingo P.M.B. 1167, Nigeria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The advancement of technology is making university campuses smarter every single day. Despite the benefits of these advanced technologies, the literature concerning the adoption of smart campuses is significantly lacking increased knowledge to provide effective smart campus solutions. This study aims to prioritize the adoption factors of an IoT-based smart campus. The study applied an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) on 25 factors drawn from the literature. The factors were classified into technology specific factors (TSF), organizational specific factors (OSF), environmental specific factors (ESF), and end-user specific factors (USF). Based on the results obtained, the most significant contributing factors were government support, privacy concerns, social influence, facilitating conditions, and service collaboration, whereas the least significant contributing factors were enjoyment, availability, reliability, mobility, and compatibility. Moreover, based on the global ranking computation, 12 factors from the OSF, ESF, and USF categories appeared to be more significant than TSF. The findings of this study could help university administrators, manufacturers, and policy-makers to understand the critical factors of smart campuses in order to improve the adoption and utilization of these solutions effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Radhwan Sneesl & Yusmadi Yah Jusoh & Marzanah A. Jabar & Salfarina Abdullah & Umar Ali Bukar, 2022. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of IoT-Based Smart Campus: An Investigation Using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8359-:d:858231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duke, Joshua M. & Aull-Hyde, Rhonda, 2002. "Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 131-145, August.
    2. Han, Heejeong & Park, Arum & Chung, Namho & Lee, Kyoung Jun, 2016. "A near field communication adoption and its impact on Expo visitors’ behavior," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1328-1339.
    3. Forman, Ernest & Peniwati, Kirti, 1998. "Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 165-169, July.
    4. Shrestha, Ram K. & Alavalapati, Janaki R. R. & Kalmbacher, Robert S., 2004. "Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 185-199, September.
    5. Jung, Yoonhyuk & Park, Jonghwa, 2018. "An investigation of relationships among privacy concerns, affective responses, and coping behaviors in location-based services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 15-24.
    6. Mahak Sharma & Ruchita Gupta & Padmanav Acharya, 2020. "Prioritizing the Critical Factors of Cloud Computing Adoption Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(1), pages 142-161, February.
    7. Yasir Ahmad & Danial Saeed Pirzada, 2014. "Using Analytic Hierarchy Process for Exploring Prioritization of Functional Strategies in Auto Parts Manufacturing SMEs of Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    8. Radhwan Sneesl & Yusmadi Yah Jusoh & Marzanah A. Jabar & Salfarina Abdullah, 2022. "Revising Technology Adoption Factors for IoT-Based Smart Campuses: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Won, Jeong Yeon & Park, Min Jae, 2020. "Smart factory adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises: Empirical evidence of manufacturing industry in Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Ronaghi, Mohammad Hossein & Forouharfar, Amir, 2020. "A contextualized study of the usage of the Internet of things (IoTs) in smart farming in a typical Middle Eastern country within the context of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Vian Ahmed & Karam Abu Alnaaj & Sara Saboor, 2020. "An Investigation into Stakeholders’ Perception of Smart Campus Criteria: The American University of Sharjah as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Mital, Monika & Chang, Victor & Choudhary, Praveen & Papa, Armando & Pani, Ashis K., 2018. "Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 339-346.
    13. A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & M. A. Alsalem & Fayiz Momani & Omar Zughoul, 2020. "Novel Multiperspective Hiring Framework for the Selection of Software Programmer Applicants Based on AHP and Group TOPSIS Techniques," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 775-847, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed Abdul-Rahman & Wale Alade & Shahnawaz Anwer, 2023. "A Composite Resilience Index (CRI) for Developing Resilience and Sustainability in University Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radhwan Sneesl & Yusmadi Yah Jusoh & Marzanah A. Jabar & Salfarina Abdullah, 2022. "Revising Technology Adoption Factors for IoT-Based Smart Campuses: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Syed Hammad Mian & Bashir Salah & Wadea Ameen & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah, 2020. "Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    3. Aull-Hyde, Rhonda & Erdogan, Sevgi & Duke, Joshua M., 2006. "An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 290-295, May.
    4. O. Flores Baquero & J. Gallego-Ayala & R. Giné-Garriga & A. Jiménez-Fernández. Palencia & A. Pérez-Foguet, 2017. "The Influence of the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation Normative Content in Measuring the Level of Service," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 763-786, September.
    5. Paiola, Marco & Schiavone, Francesco & Khvatova, Tatiana & Grandinetti, Roberto, 2021. "Prior knowledge, industry 4.0 and digital servitization. An inductive framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Contreras, Francisco & Hanaki, Keisuke & Aramaki, Toshiya & Connors, Stephen, 2008. "Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 979-991.
    7. Gomez-Limon, J.A. & Atance, I., 2004. "Identification of public objectives related to agricultural sector support," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(8-9), pages 1045-1071, December.
    8. Collins Okello & Stefania Pindozzi & Salvatore Faugno & Lorenzo Boccia, 2014. "Appraising Bioenergy Alternatives in Uganda Using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a Desirability Functions Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, February.
    9. José A. Gómez-Limón & Ignacio Atance, 2004. "Identification of Public Objectives Related to Agricultural Sector Support," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2004/57, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
    10. Garbuzova-Schlifter, Maria & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 559-581.
    11. Mesa, Pascual & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Berbel, Julio, 2008. "Análisis multicriterio de preferencias sociales en gestión hídrica bajo la Directiva Marco del Agua," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(02), pages 1-22.
    12. Petra Grošelj & Špela Pezdevšek Malovrh & Lidija Zadnik Stirn, 2011. "Methods based on data envelopment analysis for deriving group priorities in analytic hierarchy process," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(3), pages 267-284, September.
    13. Kukrety, Sidhanand & Dwivedi, Puneet & Jose, Shibu & Alavalapati, Janaki R.R., 2013. "Stakeholders' perceptions on developing sustainable Red Sanders (Pterocarpus santalinus L.) wood trade in Andhra Pradesh, India," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 43-53.
    14. Lee, Seungbum & Walsh, Patrick, 2011. "SWOT and AHP hybrid model for sport marketing outsourcing using a case of intercollegiate sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 361-369.
    15. Nikou, Shahrokh & Mezei, József, 2013. "Evaluation of mobile services and substantial adoption factors with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 915-929.
    16. Lulwah AlSuwaidan & Nuha Almegren, 2020. "Validating the Adoption of Heterogeneous Internet of Things with Blockchain," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Pablo Aragonés‐Beltrán & Mª. Carmen González‐Cruz & Astrid León‐Camargo & Rosario Viñoles‐Cebolla, 2023. "Assessment of regional development needs according to criteria based on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Meta Region (Colombia)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1101-1121, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8359-:d:858231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.