IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7819-d848820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welfare-Partnership Dynamics and Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Hermínia Gonçalves

    (Center for Transdisciplinary Studies for Development, Department of Economics, Sociology and Management, University of Trás os Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

The welfare partnership is defined as the process through which local agents interact with each other in the dynamics of collectively defining strategic objectives and building place-based approaches that reinforce local citizenship. What can we learn from the experience of municipal social action partnerships that is likely to assist us in building sustainable development formulas? This article analyses the partnership practices in six Portuguese municipalities in the Northern Region, discussing forms of social support that are convergent with sustainable development and how they tend to be articulated in municipal social action partnerships. The present research followed phenomenological reasoning using qualitative methods and multiple case studies. There were debates with professionals, looking for explicit meanings in the abstract knowledge of the concept trajectory. The results suggest that convergence with sustainable development resides in the combination of three elements: (1) developing innovative eco-community social responses that are aligned with a comprehensive social sustainability ideal that is contextualized in the relationship between subjectivities and territory, as well as with the general principles of the providence system; (2) implementing a local strategic planning practice, monitored and aligned with local projects that act on the ecological effect, determining local vulnerabilities; and (3) adopting an efficient practice of governance and allocation of stakeholders and resources, emphasizing the multilevel articulation and durability of the implemented local processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hermínia Gonçalves, 2022. "Welfare-Partnership Dynamics and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7819-:d:848820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Fiorino, 2011. "Explaining national environmental performance: approaches, evidence, and implications," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(4), pages 367-389, November.
    2. Tisdell, Clem, 1988. "Sustainable development: differing perspectives of ecologists and economists, and relevance to LDCs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 373-384, March.
    3. Ayres, Robert U., 2008. "Sustainability economics: Where do we stand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 281-310, September.
    4. Gayoung Choi & Taeyoung Jin & Yoonjeong Jeong & Sue Kyoung Lee, 2020. "Evolution of Partnerships for Sustainable Development: The Case of P4G," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Hasan Fauzi & Goran Svensson & Azhar Abdul Rahman, 2010. "“Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Kerstin Sonesson & Birgitta Nordén, 2020. "We Learnt a Lot: Challenges and Learning Experiences in a Southern African—North European Municipal Partnership on Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Leigh Holland, 2003. "Can the principle of the ecological footprint be applied to measure the environmental sustainability of business?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 224-232, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahi, Payman & Searcy, Cory & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2018. "A Quantitative Approach for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Corporations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 336-346.
    2. Isabel Gallego-Alvarez & Mª Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mª Purificación Galindo-Villardón & Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa, 2014. "Environmental Performance in Countries Worldwide: Determinant Factors and Multivariate Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Simonis, Udo E., 1996. "Klimaprotokoll - zu den Verteilungsproblemen der Weltumweltpolitik," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 37-61.
    4. Roma, Antonio & Pirino, Davide, 2009. "The extraction of natural resources: The role of thermodynamic efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2594-2606, August.
    5. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Xiaosu Ye & Hanyue Qi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Carey W. King, 2016. "Information Theory to Assess Relations Between Energy and Structure of the U.S. Economy Over Time," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-33, December.
    7. Xiangnan Fan & Yuning Cheng & Fangqi Tan & Tianyi Zhao, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of the Ecological Security Pattern in Liyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Yu Jiang & H. Holly Wang & Shaosheng Jin & Michael S. Delgado, 2019. "The Promising Effect of a Green Food Label in the New Online Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Martínez-Alier, Joan & Pascual, Unai & Vivien, Franck-Dominique & Zaccai, Edwin, 2010. "Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1741-1747, July.
    10. Serrenho, André Cabrera & Warr, Benjamin & Sousa, Tânia & Ayres, Robert U. & Domingos, Tiago, 2016. "Structure and dynamics of useful work along the agriculture-industry-services transition: Portugal from 1856 to 2009," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-21.
    11. Thai-Ha Le & Youngho Chang & Donghyun Park, 2019. "Economic development and environmental sustainability: evidence from Asia," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1129-1156, October.
    12. Halkos, George Emm. & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2009. "Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries' environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2168-2176, May.
    13. Ludmila Kormishkina & Evgenii Kormishkin & Vladimir Gorin & Dmitrii Koloskov & Ludmila Koroleva, 2019. "Environmental investment: the most adequate neo-industrial response to the growth dilemma of the economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 929-948, December.
    14. Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & Ladislav Pilař & Klára Margarisová & Roman Kvasnička, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media: Comparison between Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Gupta, Sanjeev & Miranda, Kenneth & Parry, Ian, 1995. "Public expenditure policy and the environment: A review and synthesis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 515-528, March.
    16. Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin, 2010. "Sustainability economics -- General versus specific, and conceptual versus practical," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2056-2059, September.
    17. Marie Dočekalová, 2013. "Construction of corporate social performance indicators for Czech manufacturing industry," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 309-315.
    18. Yingbin Zhou & Siqi Lv & Jianlin Wang & Junbo Tong & Zhong Fang, 2022. "The Impact of Green Taxes on the Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Oghuvwu, M. E. & Omoye, A.S, 2016. "Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Performance: The Balanced Scorecard Approach," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(4), pages 1-63, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7819-:d:848820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.