IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7358-d840017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Circularity of MSW in Urban Landscapes: An Evaluation Method for a Sustainable System Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Elvira Nicolini

    (Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

The debate on the sustainable perspective of a circular economy and MSW (Municipal Solid Waste) management is no longer focused on the resolution of an emergency and on the pure technicality of creating efficient services. New light has been shed on the operational phase, as often unresolvable technical-environmental issues during service management lead to a state of decay, affecting urban vulnerability and users’ involvement. The research aims to develop an auxiliary tool for public administrations in planning a zero-waste future whilst enhancing the urban landscape. This study considers the perspective of virtuous management of the resource flow cycle along with evaluating implementable theoretic models, operational scenarios, and technological tools that can be integrated into a specific built environment. The first phase consisted in the definition of the involved subjects and the evaluation criteria for the impact of the service management system. The second phase includes the definition of operational strategies for virtuous and sustainable management of resource flows, intended as opportunities for the regeneration and development of the local context. The result of this research work is the elaboration and experimentation of an information system for the evaluation of the integrability of operational scenarios with the systemic, quantitative, and qualitative elements that characterize an urban landscape. The selected actions and technologies have been assessed in terms of short-term feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and local efficacy. This research work shows that many urban contexts with efficient services have been conceived as ecosystems, integrated into the landscape, driven by the synergy of institutions and operators, capable of carrying out the entire cycle from waste production to the marketing of recycled products. Our analysis shows that this issue can be effectively tackled through varied and mixed solutions; by integrating strategies, techniques, and scenarios, and by stimulating citizens’ involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Elvira Nicolini, 2022. "The Circularity of MSW in Urban Landscapes: An Evaluation Method for a Sustainable System Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7358-:d:840017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7358/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7358/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pier Luigi Sacco & Alessandro Crociata, 2013. "A Conceptual Regulatory Framework for the Design and Evaluation of Complex, Participative Cultural Planning Strategies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1688-1706, September.
    2. Lucia Della Spina & Claudia Giorno, 2022. "Waste Landscape: Urban Regeneration Process for Shared Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alena Harbiankova & Sławomir Kalinowski, 2023. "MSW Management to Zero Waste: Challenges and Perspectives in Belarus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    2. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    3. Buscema, Massimo & Ferilli, Guido & Gustafsson, Christer & Massini, Giulia & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2022. "A nonlinear, data-driven, ANNs-based approach to culture-led development policies in rural areas: The case of Gjakove and Peć districts, Western Kosovo," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Antonio Russo & Alan Quaglieri Domínguez, 2012. "The nexus between creative workforce and economic development: looking for the causal relation," ERSA conference papers ersa12p364, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Alessandro Crociata & Massimiliano Agovino & Antonio Russo & Alan Quaglieri Domínguez, 2018. "Creative Workforce and Economic Development in Precrisis Europe," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(4), pages 448-479, July.
    6. Marco Bellandi & Daniela Campus & Alessandro Carraro & Erica Santini, 2020. "Accumulation of cultural capital at the intersection of socio-demographic features and productive specializations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(1), pages 1-34, March.
    7. Ludovico Centis & Ezio Micelli, 2021. "Regenerating Places outside the Metropolis. A Reading of Three Global Art-Related Processes and Development Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Francesca Ciampa, 2023. "A Creative Approach for the Architectural Technology: Using the ExtrArtis Model to Regenerate the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Diego Barrado-Timón & Antonio Palacios & Carmen Hidalgo-Giralt, 2020. "Medium and Small Cities, Culture and the Economy of Culture. A Review of the Approach to the Case of Spain in Light of International Scientific Scholarship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Crociata, Alessandro & Agovino, Massimiliano & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2015. "Recycling waste: Does culture matter?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 40-47.
    11. Paolo Massimo Buscema & Guido Ferilli & Christer Gustafsson & Pier Luigi Sacco, 2020. "The Complex Dynamic Evolution of Cultural Vibrancy in the Region of Halland, Sweden," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(3), pages 159-202, May.
    12. Gloria Cicerone & Alessandro Crociata & Daniele Mantegazzi, 2021. "Cultural and creative industries and regional diversification: Does size matter?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(3), pages 671-687, June.
    13. Lucia Della Spina, 2019. "Multidimensional Assessment for “Culture-Led” and “Community-Driven” Urban Regeneration as Driver for Trigger Economic Vitality in Urban Historic Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Can Kara & Aminreza Iranmanesh, 2022. "Modelling and Assessing Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Historic Urban Quarters via Analytical Hierarchy Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2013. "Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes: System-Wide Cultural Districts I: Theory," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 555-570, December.
    16. Alessandro Crociata & Iacopo Odoardi & Massimiliano Agovino & Pier Luigi Sacco, 2020. "A missing link? Cultural capital as a source of human capital: evidence from Italian regional data," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(1), pages 79-109, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7358-:d:840017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.