IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p6992-d833648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Study of Paddy Drainage Treatment by Zeolite and Effective Microorganisms (EM)

Author

Listed:
  • Shuyu Wu

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Zhuangzhuang Zhang

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Jiang Li

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Tianao Wu

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xiyun Jiao

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

Eco-ditch systems have increasingly been designed and applied as a strategy to decrease the risks of water eutrophication and contamination pollution for sustainable agriculture. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the water quality of eco-ditch substrates amended with zeolite and Effective Microorganisms (EM), such as pH, dissolved oxygen concentration (DO), ammonium nitrogen concentration (NH 4 + -N), and nitrate nitrogen concentration (NO 3 − -N). Laboratory experiments were conducted with four single substrates (soil, none substrates, natural zeolite, and zeolite loaded with EM bacteria) and two mixed substrates (soil and varying proportions of the additives, 0, 5 and 15%, m/m). Results showed that the concentration of NH 4 + -N was decreased with the increasing rates of additives, and zeolite loaded with EM bacteria had the highest nitrogen removal rate (97.90%) under static experimental condition. The application rate of 15% zeolite loaded with EM bacteria on the eco-ditch exerted a better effect on NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N removal without pH reduction, decreased by 87.19% for NH 4 + -N and 30.33% for NO 3 − -N, respectively. Path analysis showed that zeolite addition had a rapid effect (path coefficient = −0.972) on free NH 4 + -N ions adsorption in early 1–3 days, then EM loaded at zeolite further decreased NH 4 + -N (path coefficient = −0.693) and NO 3 − -N (path coefficient = −0.334) via bacterial metabolism. Based on the results, the applications of natural zeolite and Effective Microorganisms (EM) at an appropriate rate (15%, m/m) can significantly improve water quality of paddy drainage via exerting effects on nitrogen removal.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuyu Wu & Zhuangzhuang Zhang & Jiang Li & Tianao Wu & Xiyun Jiao, 2022. "An Experimental Study of Paddy Drainage Treatment by Zeolite and Effective Microorganisms (EM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6992-:d:833648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lokesh Kumar & Jaigopal Sharma & Raminder Kaur, 2022. "Catalytic Performance of Cow-Dung Sludge in Water Treatment Mitigation and Conversion of Ammonia Nitrogen into Nitrate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Apostolos Spyridonidis & Ioanna A. Vasiliadou & Katerina Stamatelatou, 2022. "Effect of Zeolite on the Methane Production from Chicken Manure Leachate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Kishan Mahmud & Dinesh Panday & Anaas Mergoum & Ali Missaoui, 2021. "Nitrogen Losses and Potential Mitigation Strategies for a Sustainable Agroecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Max-Frederik Piepel & Hans-Werner Olfs, 2023. "Development of a Physicochemical Test Kit for On-Farm Measurement of Nutrients in Liquid Organic Manures," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Małgorzata Holka & Jolanta Kowalska & Magdalena Jakubowska, 2022. "Reducing Carbon Footprint of Agriculture—Can Organic Farming Help to Mitigate Climate Change?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Jingjing Zhu & Feifei Dou & Fesobi Olumide Phillip & Gang Liu & Huaifeng Liu, 2023. "Effect of Nitrification Inhibitors on Photosynthesis and Nitrogen Metabolism in ‘Sweet Sapphire’ ( V. vinifera L.) Grape Seedlings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Andreas Meyer-Aurich & Yusuf Nadi Karatay, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Costs of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Danute Petraityte & Jurgita Ceseviciene & Ausra Arlauskiene & Alvyra Slepetiene & Aida Skersiene & Viktorija Gecaite, 2022. "Variation of Soil Nitrogen, Organic Carbon, and Waxy Wheat Yield Using Liquid Organic and Mineral Fertilizers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Maria Giordano & Spyridon A. Petropoulos & Youssef Rouphael, 2021. "The Fate of Nitrogen from Soil to Plants: Influence of Agricultural Practices in Modern Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Jasmina Defterdarović & Lana Filipović & Filip Kranjčec & Gabrijel Ondrašek & Diana Kikić & Alen Novosel & Ivan Mustać & Vedran Krevh & Ivan Magdić & Vedran Rubinić & Igor Bogunović & Ivan Dugan & Kre, 2021. "Determination of Soil Hydraulic Parameters and Evaluation of Water Dynamics and Nitrate Leaching in the Unsaturated Layered Zone: A Modeling Case Study in Central Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Osvaldo Salazar & Renato Diaz & Adriana Nario & Ximena Videla & María Alonso-Ayuso & Miguel Quemada, 2021. "Nitrogen Fertilizer Efficiency Determined by the 15 N Dilution Technique in Maize Followed or Not by a Cover Crop in Mediterranean Chile," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6992-:d:833648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.