IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6929-d832652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Cost Allocation in Renovation of Old Urban Residential Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Zhuo

    (Engineering Management, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Hongbing Li

    (Engineering Management, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

The renovation of old residential communities not only meets the people’s aspirations for a better life, but also promotes the image of a city. However, unreasonable cost allocation in the renovation of old residential communities seriously impedes the multi-channel fundraising and progress of renovation. The general aim of this study was to construct a cost allocation model for the renovation of old residential communities, so as to address unreasonable cost allocation and speed up the renovation. With the government, home owners, and private sectors as the main participants and stakeholders, we constructed a cost allocation model for the renovation of old residential communities based on the structural equation model and the Shapley value. The structural equation model is used for indicator screening and weight computing, while the Shapley value is used for cost allocation. Then, we improved the cost allocation model based on the influencing factors that were screened out. This discovery will increase the cooperation between the government, home owners, and private sectors to fund the renovation of old residential communities, and further improve the progress of renovation of old residential communities. The study results show that by fully taking into account the degree of participation, the degree of risk sharing, the degree of value-added return, and the degree of resource input of participants, the improved cost allocation model makes the cost allocation more reasonable and fairer.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Zhuo & Hongbing Li, 2022. "A Study on Cost Allocation in Renovation of Old Urban Residential Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6929-:d:832652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6929/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6929/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coggan, Anthea & van Grieken, Martijn & Boullier, Alexis & Jardi, Xavier, 2015. "Private transaction costs of participation in water quality improvement programs for Australia’s Great Barrier Reef: Extent, causes and policy implications," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(4), October.
    2. Vito Fragnelli & Anna Iandolino, 2004. "A cost allocation problem in urban solid wastes collection and disposal," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 59(3), pages 447-463, July.
    3. Woongkyoo Bae & UnHyo Kim & Jeongwoo Lee, 2019. "Evaluation of the Criteria for Designating Maintenance Districts in Low-Rise Residential Areas: Urban Renewal Projects in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Jiekun Song & Xiaoping Ma & Rui Chen, 2021. "A Profit Distribution Model of Reverse Logistics Based on Fuzzy DEA Efficiency—Modified Shapley Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Xianfeng Xu & Desheng Xue & Gengzhi Huang, 2022. "The Effects of Residents’ Sense of Place on Their Willingness to Support Urban Renewal: A Case Study of Century-Old East Street Renewal Project in Shaoguan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anqi Wang & Yanhua An & Shuhua Yu, 2023. "Research on the Evaluation of Green Technology Renovation Measurement for Multi-Storey Houses in Severe Cold Regions Based on Entropy-Weight-TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junpai Chen & Yue Chen & Yitong Zhu & Mingyan Xiao & Hongfei Yang & Huaming Huang & Linli Li, 2023. "Assessing the Sustainability of Urban Community Renewal Projects in Southern China Based on a Hybrid MADM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-33, February.
    2. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Vito Fragnelli & Gianfranco Gambarelli, 2014. "Further open problems in cooperative games," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 24(4), pages 51-62.
    4. David Asante Edwin & Evam Kofi Glover & Edinam K. Glover, 2020. "When Tradition Meets Modernity in Land Registration: Evidence from Dagbon, Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Hanbin Wei & Mengru Zhou & Sunju Kang & Jiahao Zhang, 2022. "Sense of Place of Heritage Conservation Districts under the Tourist Gaze—Case of the Shichahai Heritage Conservation District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Indranil De & Rooba Hasan & Mubashshir Iqbal, 2022. "Natural Treatment Systems and Importance of Social Cost Benefit Analysis in Developing Countries: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    7. M. Fiestras-Janeiro & Ignacio García-Jurado & Manuel Mosquera, 2011. "Cooperative games and cost allocation problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, July.
    8. van Grieken, M.E. & Roebeling, P.C. & Bohnet, I.C. & Whitten, S.M. & Webster, A.J. & Poggio, M. & Pannell, D., 2019. "Adoption of agricultural management for Great Barrier Reef water quality improvement in heterogeneous farming communities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Habib Zare Ahmadabadi & Fatemeh Zamzam & Ali Emrouznejad & Alireza Naser Sadrabadi & Ali Morovati Sharifabadi, 2024. "A modified distance friction minimization model with optimistic–pessimistic target orientation for OECD sustainable performance measurement," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23113-23149, September.
    10. Algaba, Encarnación & Fragnelli, Vito & Llorca, Natividad & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquin, 2019. "Horizontal cooperation in a multimodal public transport system: The profit allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 659-665.
    11. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Shahab, Sina & Clinch, J. Peter & O’Neill, Eoin, 2018. "Accounting for transaction costs in planning policy evaluation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 263-272.
    13. María Gómez-Rúa & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2014. "Bargaining and membership," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 800-814, July.
    14. Robert J. Johnston & Tom Ndebele & David A. Newburn, 2023. "Modeling transaction costs in household adoption of landscape conservation practices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(1), pages 341-367, January.
    15. Star, Megan & Rolfe, John & Barbi, Emily, 2019. "Do outcome or input risks limit adoption of environmental projects: Rehabilitating gullies in Great Barrier Reef catchments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 73-82.
    16. Sina Shahab & Leonhard K. Lades, 2020. "Sludge and Transaction Costs," Working Papers 202007, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    17. Christian Ritzel & Gabriele Mack & Marco Portmann & Katja Heitkämper & Nadja El Benni, 2020. "Empirical evidence on factors influencing farmers’ administrative burden: A structural equation modeling approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. V. Fragnelli, 2008. "Comments on: Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 42-43, July.
    19. J. C. Gonçalves-Dosantos & I. García-Jurado & J. Costa & J. M. Alonso-Meijide, 2022. "Necessary players and values," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 935-961, November.
    20. Michael Jones & Jennifer Wilson, 2013. "Two-step coalition values for multichoice games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 77(1), pages 65-99, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6929-:d:832652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.