IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p438-d715647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Impact of Biostimulator NeOsol and Three Different Manure Types on Physical Soil Properties and Crop Status in Heavy Soils Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Václav Novák

    (Department of Machinery Utilization, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Šařec

    (Department of Machinery Utilization, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Kateřina Křížová

    (Department of Machinery Utilization, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic
    Division of Crop Protection and Plant Health, Crop Research Institute, 161 06 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Novák

    (Department of Agricultural Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Oldřich Látal

    (Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This study was conducted to understand the long-term influence of biostimulator NeOsol in combination with different manure types on soil’s physical properties and crop status. NeOsol is a soil biostimulator that should stimulate the biological reactions of the soil profile and improve the soil’s physical and chemical properties. A six-year experiment was conducted with eight treatments: NPK, cattle manure, pig manure, poultry manure, and the same four treatments with the NeOsol added on top. The in situ sampling of soil properties provided data on unit draft (UD), bulk density (BD), and saturated hydraulic conductivity (SHC). Furthermore, remotely sensed data were analyzed to describe crop status via three selected vegetation indices (VI), and crop yields were assessed last. The variants treated with NeOsol demonstrated decreases in UD over time; BD, SHC, and VI did not significantly change. The impact on yield was significant and increased over time. When comparing the variants with manure application to those without one, the cattle manure led to significantly higher SHC; the pig manure led to significantly lower UD and BD but significantly higher SHC and yield; and the poultry manure led to significantly lower UD and BD but higher yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Václav Novák & Petr Šařec & Kateřina Křížová & Petr Novák & Oldřich Látal, 2021. "Potential Impact of Biostimulator NeOsol and Three Different Manure Types on Physical Soil Properties and Crop Status in Heavy Soils Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:438-:d:715647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/438/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/438/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, Xuan & Stack, Martin, 2018. "How data analytics is transforming agriculture," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 125-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Lei & Lin, Jiabao & Ouyang, Ye & Luo, Xin (Robert), 2022. "Evaluating the impact of big data analytics usage on the decision-making quality of organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Divya Suresh & Abhishek Choudhury & Yinjia Zhang & Zhiying Zhao & Rajib Shaw, 2024. "The Role of Data-Driven Agritech Startups—The Case of India and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Jingmei Gao & Zahid Sarwar, 2024. "How do firms create business value and dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics management capability?," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 283-304, September.
    4. Mosch, Philipp & Schweikl, Stefan & Obermaier, Robert, 2021. "Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Theocharis Moysiadis & Konstantina Spanaki & Ayalew Kassahun & Sabine Kläser & Nicolas Becker & George Alexiou & Nikolaos Zotos & Iliada Karali, 2022. "AgriFood Supply Chain Traceability: Data Sharing in a farm-to-fork case," Post-Print hal-03766179, HAL.
    6. Paul B. Hegedus & Bruce Maxwell & John Sheppard & Sasha Loewen & Hannah Duff & Giorgio Morales-Luna & Amy Peerlinck, 2023. "Towards a Low-Cost Comprehensive Process for On-Farm Precision Experimentation and Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Brave, Scott A. & Butters, R. Andrew & Fogarty, Michael, 2022. "The perils of working with big data, and a SMALL checklist you can use to recognize them," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 481-492.
    8. Alshawawreh, Ali Ra’Ed & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of big data analytics on telecom companies' competitive advantage," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Klingenberg, Cristina Orsolin & Valle Antunes Júnior, José Antônio & Müller-Seitz, Gordon, 2022. "Impacts of digitalization on value creation and capture: Evidence from the agricultural value chain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Luis Ruiz-Garcia & Patricia Sanchez-Guerrero, 2022. "A Decision Support Tool for Buying Farm Tractors, Based on Predictive Analytics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Kosior, Katarzyna, 2020. "Economic, Ethical and Legal Aspectsof Digitalization in The Agri-Food Sector," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311227, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    12. Njomane, Linda & Telukdarie, Arnesh, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 food supply chain: Comparing the use of IoT in three South African supermarkets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Jérémie Forney & Angga Dwiartama, 2023. "The project, the everyday, and reflexivity in sociotechnical agri-food assemblages: proposing a conceptual model of digitalisation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 441-454, June.
    14. Jerry L. Holechek & Hatim M. E. Geli & Andres F. Cibils & Mohammed N. Sawalhah, 2020. "Climate Change, Rangelands, and Sustainability of Ranching in the Western United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Jennifer Clapp & Sarah-Louise Ruder, 2020. "Precision Technologies for Agriculture: Digital Farming, Gene-EditedCrops, and the Politics of Sustainability," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(3), pages 49-69, August.
    16. repec:mth:jas888:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:84-97 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ioannis Margaritis & Michael Madas & Maro Vlachopoulou, 2022. "Big Data Applications in Food Supply Chain Management: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Antonio Manuel Ciruela-Lorenzo & Ana Rosa Del-Aguila-Obra & Antonio Padilla-Meléndez & Juan José Plaza-Angulo, 2020. "Digitalization of Agri-Cooperatives in the Smart Agriculture Context. Proposal of a Digital Diagnosis Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:438-:d:715647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.