IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5149-d548844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEV): Policy Advances to Enhance Commercial Success

Author

Listed:
  • Usman Asif

    (Department of Technology, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA)

  • Klaus Schmidt

    (Department of Technology, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA)

Abstract

Many initiatives and policies attempt to make our air cleaner by reducing the carbon foot imprint on our planet. Most of the existing and planned initiatives have as their objectives the reduction of carbon dependency and the enhancement of newer or better technologies in the near future. However, numerous policies exist for electric vehicles (EVs), and only some policies address specific issues related to fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV). The lack of a distinction between the policies for EVs and FCEVs provides obstacles for the advancement of FCEV-related technologies that may otherwise be successful and competitive in the attempt to create a cleaner planet. Unfortunately, the lack of this distinction is not always based on intellectual or scientific evidence. Therefore, governments may need to introduce clearer policy distinctions in order to directly address FCEV-related challenges that may not pertain to other EVs. Unfortunately, lobbyism continues to exist that supports the maintenance of the status quo as new technologies may threaten traditional, less sustainable approaches to provide opportunities for a better environment. This lobbyism has partially succeeded in hindering the advancement of new technologies, partially because the development of new technologies may reduce profit and business opportunities for traditionalists. However, these challenges are slowly overcome as the demand for cleaner air and lower carbon emissions has increased, and a stronger movement toward newer and cleaner technologies has gained momentum. This paper will look at policies that have been either implemented or are in the process of being implemented to address the challenge of overcoming traditional obstacles with respect to the automobile industry. The paper reviewed, synthesized, and discussed policies in the USA, Japan, and the European Union that helped implement new technologies with a focus on FCEVs for larger mass markets. These regions were the focus of this paper because of their particular challenges. South Korea and China were not included in this discussion as these countries already have equal or even more advanced policies and initiatives in place.

Suggested Citation

  • Usman Asif & Klaus Schmidt, 2021. "Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEV): Policy Advances to Enhance Commercial Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5149-:d:548844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sugiyama, Masahiro & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Wada, Kenichi & Endo, Seiya & Fujii, Yasumasa & Komiyama, Ryoichi & Kato, Etsushi & Kurosawa, Atsushi & Matsuo, Yuhji & Oshiro, Ken & Sano, Fuminori & Shira, 2019. "Japan's long-term climate mitigation policy: Multi-model assessment and sectoral challenges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1120-1131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Halder, Pobitra & Babaie, Meisam & Salek, Farhad & Shah, Kalpit & Stevanovic, Svetlana & Bodisco, Timothy A. & Zare, Ali, 2024. "Performance, emissions and economic analyses of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Hassan Qudrat-Ullah, 2022. "Adoption and Growth of Fuel Cell Vehicles in China: The Case of BYD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Guangjin Pan & Yunpeng Bai & Huihui Song & Yanbin Qu & Yang Wang & Xiaofei Wang, 2023. "Hydrogen Fuel Cell Power System—Development Perspectives for Hybrid Topologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Christopher W. H. Davis & Antonie J. Jetter & Philippe J. Giabbanelli, 2022. "Automatically Generating Scenarios from a Text Corpus: A Case Study on Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Alessandra Perna & Mariagiovanna Minutillo & Simona Di Micco & Elio Jannelli, 2022. "Design and Costs Analysis of Hydrogen Refuelling Stations Based on Different Hydrogen Sources and Plant Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Dorota Burchart & Magdalena Gazda-Grzywacz & Przemysław Grzywacz & Piotr Burmistrz & Katarzyna Zarębska, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Coal Gasification as an Alternative Transport Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Zhaowen Liang & Kai Liu & Jinjin Huang & Enfei Zhou & Chao Wang & Hui Wang & Qiong Huang & Zhenpo Wang, 2022. "Powertrain Design and Energy Management Strategy Optimization for a Fuel Cell Electric Intercity Coach in an Extremely Cold Mountain Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikas, A. & Gambhir, A. & Trutnevyte, E. & Koasidis, K. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Mayer, D. & Zachmann, G. & Miguel, L.J. & Ferreras-Alonso, N. & Sognnaes, I. & Peters, G.P. & Colombo, E. & Howe, 2021. "Perspective of comprehensive and comprehensible multi-model energy and climate science in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    2. Misconel, S. & Leisen, R. & Mikurda, J. & Zimmermann, F. & Fraunholz, C. & Fichtner, W. & Möst, D. & Weber, C., 2022. "Systematic comparison of high-resolution electricity system modeling approaches focusing on investment, dispatch and generation adequacy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Shinichi Taniguchi, 2020. "Examining the causality structures of electricity interchange and variable renewable energy: a comparison between Japan and Denmark," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 159-191, February.
    4. van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Torralba-Díaz, Laura & Bußar, Christian, 2022. "Impacts of power sector model features on optimal capacity expansion: A comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Yunus Zengin & Serkan Naktiyok & Erdoğan Kaygın & Onur Kavak & Ethem Topçuoğlu, 2021. "An Investigation upon Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 within the Context of Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Matsuo, Yuhji & Endo, Seiya & Nagatomi, Yu & Shibata, Yoshiaki & Komiyama, Ryoichi & Fujii, Yasumasa, 2020. "Investigating the economics of the power sector under high penetration of variable renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    7. Chaube, Anshuman & Chapman, Andrew & Minami, Akari & Stubbins, James & Huff, Kathryn D., 2021. "The role of current and emerging technologies in meeting Japan’s mid- to long-term carbon reduction goals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    8. Oshiro, Ken & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Ochi, Yuki & Ehara, Tomoki, 2021. "Enabling energy system transition toward decarbonization in Japan through energy service demand reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Fragkos, Panagiotis & Laura van Soest, Heleen & Schaeffer, Roberto & Reedman, Luke & Köberle, Alexandre C. & Macaluso, Nick & Evangelopoulou, Stavroula & De Vita, Alessia & Sha, Fu & Qimin, Chai & Kej, 2021. "Energy system transitions and low-carbon pathways in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU-28, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russia and the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Wu, Wenchao & Hasegawa, Tomoko & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Takahashi, Kiyoshi & Oshiro, Ken, 2020. "Assessment of bioenergy potential and associated costs in Japan for the 21st century," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 308-321.
    11. Burandt, Thorsten, 2021. "Analyzing the necessity of hydrogen imports for net-zero emission scenarios in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    12. Parrado-Hernando, Gonzalo & Herc, Luka & Pfeifer, Antun & Capellán-Perez, Iñigo & Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Duić, Neven & Frechoso-Escudero, Fernando & Miguel González, Luis Javier & Gjorgievski, Vladimir, 2022. "Capturing features of hourly-resolution energy models through statistical annual indicators," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1192-1223.
    13. Cao, Jing & Dai, Hancheng & Li, Shantong & Guo, Chaoyi & Ho, Mun & Cai, Wenjia & He, Jianwu & Huang, Hai & Li, Jifeng & Liu, Yu & Qian, Haoqi & Wang, Can & Wu, Libo & Zhang, Xiliang, 2021. "The general equilibrium impacts of carbon tax policy in China: A multi-model comparison," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Rusin, Andrzej & Wojaczek, Adam, 2023. "Changes in the structure of the Polish energy mix in the transition period to ensure the safety and reliability of energy supplies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    15. Ken Oshiro & Keii Gi & Shinichiro Fujimori & Heleen L. Soest & Christoph Bertram & Jacques Després & Toshihiko Masui & Pedro Rochedo & Mark Roelfsema & Zoi Vrontisi, 2020. "Mid-century emission pathways in Japan associated with the global 2 °C goal: national and global models’ assessments based on carbon budgets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1913-1927, October.
    16. Shimoda, Yoshiyuki & Sugiyama, Minami & Nishimoto, Ryuya & Momonoki, Takashi, 2021. "Evaluating decarbonization scenarios and energy management requirement for the residential sector in Japan through bottom-up simulations of energy end-use demand in 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    17. Anshuman Chaube & Andrew Chapman & Yosuke Shigetomi & Kathryn Huff & James Stubbins, 2020. "The Role of Hydrogen in Achieving Long Term Japanese Energy System Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5149-:d:548844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.