IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5052-d547155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment Leverage for Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage

Author

Listed:
  • Tracy Pickerill

    (School of Surveying & Construction Management, TU Dublin, Bolton Street, D01 K822 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

This article tracks the design of a panoptic toolkit of complementary financial (grant and endowment, tax, debt and equity) and non-financial (regulation, real estate, risk mitigation and performance, capacity building, impact metric and digital network) instruments, designed to leverage capital investment and engender collaborative partnerships, to encourage investment capital to flow to cultural heritage adaptive reuse activities. Cultural heritage activities encompass adaptive reuse and energy retrofit of built heritage structures, protecting natural eco-systems and enabling local community enterprise activities. These activities embody circular economy dimensions, that stimulate social, cultural, environmental and economic regeneration, within the global value chain. Many cultural heritage investments entail long-term time horizons, requiring patient investment strategies. Consideration of the financial landscape, with regard to capital investment leverage is as much about understanding the motivations of participants to engage in the capital markets, as about innovations in financial instruments to safeguard cultural heritage values. Individual financial instruments, within the toolkit, such as debt and equity tools, are not new and some have a long association within traditional capital markets. What is new, is a framework for the engagement of blended complementary instruments, pooled within diverse multidisciplinary collaborative social enterprise fund structures, to achieve intentional and measurable impact investment returns. Risk adjusted investment return metrics include the analysis of socio-cultural and environmental impact returns in unison with market based financial returns, including below market returns in some instances. A case study of a revolving social impact fund is provided to give a practical example of combined complementary hybrid financial instruments within a collaborative funding structure. The ultimate choice and design of blended and pooled hybrid tool combinations and hybrid fund structures will change from building to building, and community to community, but must always prioritize the need to protect people and ecosystems in parallel with saving vulnerable cultural heritage resources. The selection of tailored hybrid financial instruments, to enhance circular economy transitionary ambitions, must remain flexible within a long-term collaborative investment strategy. The key change in mindset, central to cultural heritage financial toolkit development, is the enablement of capital leverage investment strategies that prioritize people and the ecosystem over pure profit motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracy Pickerill, 2021. "Investment Leverage for Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5052-:d:547155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5052/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5052/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hutter & Ilde Rizzo (ed.), 1997. "Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-25824-6, December.
    2. Cian O'SHEA & Dónal PALCIC & Eoin REEVES, 2019. "Comparing Ppp With Traditional Procurement: The Case Of Schools Procurement In Ireland," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 245-267, June.
    3. James Leigland, 2018. "Public-Private Partnerships in Developing Countries: The Emerging Evidence-based Critique," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 103-134.
    4. Shirley Kempeneer & Michaël Peeters & Tine Compernolle, 2021. "Bringing the User Back in the Building: An Analysis of ESG in Real Estate and a Behavioral Framework to Guide Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    5. David Throsby, 1997. "Seven Questions in the Economics of Cultural Heritage," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Michael Hutter & Ilde Rizzo (ed.), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage, chapter 2, pages 13-30, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christer Gustafsson & Elisabetta Lazzaro, 2021. "The Innovative Response of Cultural and Creative Industries to Major European Societal Challenges: Toward a Knowledge and Competence Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Mohamed Ibrahim El-belkasy & Sahl Abdullah Wahieb, 2022. "Sustainable Conservation and Reuse of Historical City Center Applied Study on Jeddah—Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chr. Hjorth-Andersen, 2004. "The Danish Cultural Heritage: Economics and Politics," Discussion Papers 04-33, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    2. Christian Barrère, 2016. "Cultural heritages: From official to informal [Patrimoines culturels : des patrimoines officiels aux patrimoines informels]," Post-Print hal-02569029, HAL.
    3. Karin Sable & Robert Kling, 2001. "The Double Public Good: A Conceptual Framework for ``Shared Experience'' Values Associated with Heritage Conservation," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 25(2), pages 77-89, May.
    4. Ilde Rizzo, 2011. "Regulation," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 54, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Chr. Hjorth-Andersen, 2004. "The Danish Museum System," Discussion Papers 04-34, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    6. F. Javier García-Delgado & Antonio Martínez-Puche & Rubén C. Lois-González, 2020. "Heritage, Tourism and Local Development in Peripheral Rural Spaces: Mértola (Baixo Alentejo, Portugal)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Robert W. Kling & Charles F. Revier & Karin Sable, 2004. "Estimating the Public Good Value of Preserving a Local Historic Landmark: The Role of Non-substitutability and Citizen Information," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 2025-2041, September.
    8. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Rizzo, Ilde, 2009. "Determinants of Heritage Authorities’ Performance: An exploratory study with DEA bootstrapping approach," MPRA Paper 15984, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Françoise Benhamou, 2011. "Heritage," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 32, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Massimo Finocchiaro Castro & Calogero Guccio & Ilde Rizzo, 2011. "Public intervention on heritage conservation and determinants of heritage authorities’ performance: a semi-parametric analysis," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, February.
    11. World Bank, 2001. "Cultural Heritage and Development : A Framework for Action in the Middle East and North Africa," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13908.
    12. Luc Beal & Hugues Séraphin & Giuseppe Modica & Manuela Pilato & Marco Platania, 2019. "Analysing the Mediating Effect of Heritage Between Locals and Visitors: An Exploratory Study Using Mission Patrimoine as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini & Lasse Steiner, 2011. "What Determines The World Heritage List? An Econometric Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2011-01, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    14. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Leocata, Marta & Ogonowska, Malgorzata & Torre, Dominique, 2022. "Sustainable tourism," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Bruno S. Frey & Lasse Steiner, 2013. "World Heritage List," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 8, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Nizkorodov, Evgenia, 2021. "Evaluating risk allocation and project impacts of sustainability-oriented water public–private partnerships in Southern California: A comparative case analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    17. Nicole B. Baker & Christian Haddad, 2024. "Private ownership and management control decisions in infrastructure from the perspective of Transaction Cost Theory: Evidence from emerging economies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 764-791, July.
    18. Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2002. "Cultural heritage as multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: toward a new framework for economic analysis and valuation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 529-558.
    19. Bayer, Ivo & Bonus, Holger, 2005. "Europäische Identität und symbolische Politik," Beiträge zur angewandten Wirtschaftsforschung 12, University of Münster, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster (CAWM).
    20. Le Tung Bach, 2023. "The behavioral intention to adopt Proptech services in Vietnam real estate market," Papers 2312.06994, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5052-:d:547155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.