IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4130-d531857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LC and LC-IRT Models in the Identification of Polish Households with Similar Perception of Financial Position

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Genge

    (Department of Economic and Financial Analysis, University of Economics, Ul. 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

One of the pillars of sustainable development is related to the elimination of poverty and improvement of quality of life. Financial situation of the households plays a crucial role in the subjective well-being, quality of life and overall satisfaction. According to most recent Eurostat data, Poland is one of the countries with the lowest level of subjective material well-being. In this paper we aim to find latent structures of Poles with similar tendency of self-reporting their income position additionally influenced by the socio-economic features and analyze the item characteristics of the questionnaire as well. To address the questions at hand, first we apply the variant of finite mixture models, i.e., latent class (LC) model for data from all, eight waves (2000–2015) of the Polish Household Panel. We are especially focused on the constrained version of the model under IRT parameterization. We compare the results for LC and LC-IRT models and show the influence of the covariates such as family type, socio-economic status and place of living on the probability of belonging to the three identified classes of Polish households, based both on multinomial and global logit parameterization. In this way we can show which types of families tend to be more satisfied with their financial position and those whose members are prone to belong to the worst situated group of Poles. Note that, we present the results for the data including survey weighs, being omitted in most of the studies concerning Polish financial well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Genge, 2021. "LC and LC-IRT Models in the Identification of Polish Households with Similar Perception of Financial Position," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4130-:d:531857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4130/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4130/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Barrington-Leigh, 2016. "Sustainability and Well-Being: A Happy Synergy," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 59(3), pages 292-298, December.
    2. Pablo Diego-Rosell & Robert Tortora & James Bird, 2018. "International Determinants of Subjective Well-Being: Living in a Subjectively Material World," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 123-143, January.
    3. Miroslav VerbiÄ & Tine Stanovnik, 2006. "Analysis of Subjective Economic Well-Being in Slovenia," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 60-70, March.
    4. Thomas Piketty, 2015. "Putting Distribution Back at the Center of Economics: Reflections on Capital in the Twenty-First Century," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 67-88, Winter.
    5. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    6. John Grable & Sam Cupples & Fred Fernatt & NaRita Anderson, 2013. "Evaluating the Link Between Perceived Income Adequacy and Financial Satisfaction: A Resource Deficit Hypothesis Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 1109-1124, December.
    7. Marc Fleurbaey, 2009. "Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1029-1075, December.
    8. Andrzej Piosik & Marzena Strojek-Filus & Aleksandra Sulik-Górecka & Aleksandra Szewieczek, 2019. "Gender and Age as Determinants of Job Satisfaction in the Accounting Profession: Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2008. "Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 39(1 (Spring), pages 1-102.
    10. Paul Gerrans & Craig Speelman & Guillermo Campitelli, 2014. "The Relationship Between Personal Financial Wellness and Financial Wellbeing: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 145-160, June.
    11. Geoff Masters, 1982. "A rasch model for partial credit scoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 149-174, June.
    12. Clark, Andrew E. & Oswald, Andrew J., 1996. "Satisfaction and comparison income," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 359-381, September.
    13. Daria Popova & Alina Pishniak, 2017. "Measuring Individual Material Well-Being Using Multidimensional Indices: An Application Using the Gender and Generation Survey for Russia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 883-910, February.
    14. Vermunt, Jeroen K., 2010. "Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 450-469.
    15. Janusz Czapiński & Tomasz Panek, 2015. "Social Diagnosis 2015. Objective And Subjective Quality Of Life," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 9(4), December.
    16. Gasiorowska, Agata, 2014. "The relationship between objective and subjective wealth is moderated by financial control and mediated by money anxiety," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 64-74.
    17. Nurul Shahnaz Mahdzan & Rozaimah Zainudin & Mohd Edil Abd. Sukor & Fauzi Zainir & Wan Marhaini Wan Ahmad, 2019. "Determinants of Subjective Financial Well-Being Across Three Different Household Income Groups in Malaysia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 699-726, December.
    18. Sungmun Choi, 2019. "Is the Current Trend of Income Inequality Sustainable?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Gnaldi, Michela, 2014. "MultiLCIRT: An R package for multidimensional latent class item response models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 971-985.
    20. Martin Binder & Felix Ward, 2013. "The Structure of Subjective Well-being: A Vector Autoregressive Approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 361-400, May.
    21. Kacper Grejcz & Zbigniew Żółkiewski, 2017. "Household wealth in Poland: the results of a new survey of household finance," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 48(3), pages 295-326.
    22. David Andrich, 1978. "A rating formulation for ordered response categories," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 561-573, December.
    23. Martin Binder & Ulrich Witt, 2011. "As Innovations Drive Economic Growth, Do they also Raise Well-Being?," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2011-05, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    24. Alex Michalos, 2011. "What Did Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi Get Right and What Did They Get Wrong?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 117-129, May.
    25. Brzeziński, Michał & Myck, Michal & Najsztub, Mateusz, 2019. "Reevaluating Distributional Consequences of the Transition to Market Economy in Poland: New Results from Combined Household Survey and Tax Return Data," IZA Discussion Papers 12734, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    26. Martin Binder, 2014. "Subjective Well-Being Capabilities: Bridging the Gap Between the Capability Approach and Subjective Well-Being Research," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1197-1217, October.
    27. Francesco Bartolucci, 2007. "A class of multidimensional IRT models for testing unidimensionality and clustering items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 141-157, June.
    28. Brent Bleys, 2012. "Beyond GDP: Classifying Alternative Measures for Progress," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 355-376, December.
    29. Bernhard Christoph, 2010. "The Relation Between Life Satisfaction and the Material Situation: A Re-Evaluation Using Alternative Measures," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 98(3), pages 475-499, September.
    30. M. Brzeziński & B. Jancewicz & Natalia Letki, 2013. "GINI Country Report: Growing Inequalities and their Impacts in Poland," GINI Country Reports poland, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    31. Alina Stundziene, 2019. "Human Welfare: Can We Trust What They Say?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 579-604, February.
    32. Cerin, Pontus, 2006. "Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 209-225, February.
    33. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01207273 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Robitzsch, 2021. "A Comprehensive Simulation Study of Estimation Methods for the Rasch Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Stundziene, 2019. "Human Welfare: Can We Trust What They Say?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 579-604, February.
    2. Shukla, Jyoti & Yukutake, Norifumi & Tiwari, Piyush, 2021. "On Well-Being of Households in Japan and Post-Disaster Reinstatement," ADBI Working Papers 1214, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    3. Genge, Ewa & Bartolucci, Francesco, 2019. "Are attitudes towards immigration changing in Europe? An analysis based on bidimensional latent class IRT models," MPRA Paper 94672, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Martin Binder, 2014. "Subjective Well-Being Capabilities: Bridging the Gap Between the Capability Approach and Subjective Well-Being Research," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1197-1217, October.
    5. O'Donnell, Gus & Oswald, Andrew J., 2015. "National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 59-70.
    6. Yuta J. Masuda & Jason R. Williams & Heather Tallis, 2021. "Does Life Satisfaction Vary with Time and Income? Investigating the Relationship Among Free Time, Income, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 2051-2073, June.
    7. Demougin, Dominique & Upton, Harvey, 2023. "Relative income concerns and the Easterlin Paradox: A theoretical framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Kangmennaang, Joseph & Elliott, Susan J., 2018. "Towards an integrated framework for understanding the links between inequalities and wellbeing of places in low and middle income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 45-53.
    9. Silvia Bacci & Michela Gnaldi, 2015. "A classification of university courses based on students’ satisfaction: an application of a two-level mixture item response model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 927-940, May.
    10. Matthew Brzozowski & Brenda Spotton Visano, 2020. "“Havin’ Money’s Not Everything, Not Havin’ It Is”: The Importance of Financial Satisfaction for Life Satisfaction in Financially Stressed Households," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 573-591, February.
    11. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Gnaldi, Michela, 2014. "MultiLCIRT: An R package for multidimensional latent class item response models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 971-985.
    12. Ewa Genge & Francesco Bartolucci, 2022. "Are attitudes toward immigration changing in Europe? An analysis based on latent class IRT models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(2), pages 235-271, June.
    13. Vladimir Turetsky & Emil Bashkansky, 2022. "Ordinal response variation of the polytomous Rasch model," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(3), pages 305-330, December.
    14. M. Joseph Sirgy, 2018. "The Psychology of Material Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 273-301, June.
    15. Martin Binder, 2013. "Innovativeness and Subjective Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 561-578, April.
    16. Mubashir Qasim, 2018. "Some Links between Sustainability and Well-Being," Working Papers in Economics 18/13, University of Waikato.
    17. Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo, 2012. "Life Satisfaction, Household Income and Personality Traits," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 86, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    18. Yamada, Katsunori & Sato, Masayuki, 2013. "Another avenue for anatomy of income comparisons: Evidence from hypothetical choice experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 35-57.
    19. Clark, Andrew E. & Senik, Claudia & Yamada, Katsunori, 2017. "When experienced and decision utility concur: The case of income comparisons," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-9.
    20. Van Landeghem, Bert & Vandeplas, Anneleen, 2018. "The relationship between status and happiness: Evidence from the caste system in rural India," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 62-71.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4130-:d:531857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.