IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3861-d527594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Readymade Solutions and Students’ Appetite for Plagiarism as Challenges for Online Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Sorea

    (Department of Social and Communication Sciences, Transilvania University of Brașov, 29, Eroilor Bd., 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Gheorghe Roșculeț

    (Department of Social and Communication Sciences, Transilvania University of Brașov, 29, Eroilor Bd., 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Bolborici

    (Department of Social and Communication Sciences, Transilvania University of Brașov, 29, Eroilor Bd., 500036 Brașov, Romania)

Abstract

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of online learning has increased. Inherently, the stakes of a sustainable approach to the challenges raised by the wide access to the Internet, the use of readymade solutions to meet didactical tasks, and students’ appetite for plagiarism have become higher. These challenges can be sustainably managed via a procedure aimed at constructively converting students’ appetite for plagiarism (SAP conversion) into a skill of critically approaching relevant materials that are available online. The solutions proposed by the specialized literature concerned with the problem of plagiarism can be grouped into five categories: better trained students, more involved teachers, the use of anti-plagiarism software, clear anti-plagiarism policies, and ethical education of the youths. The SAP conversion procedure is a solution targeting increased involvement on behalf of teachers. Its partial application in the case of the disciplines included in the undergraduate educational program of Sociology conducted by the Transylvania University of Brasov, where students’ evaluation is based on essays, has considerably decreased the amount of student plagiarism.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Sorea & Gheorghe Roșculeț & Ana-Maria Bolborici, 2021. "Readymade Solutions and Students’ Appetite for Plagiarism as Challenges for Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3861-:d:527594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3861/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3861/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Powell & Nishani Singh, 2016. "An integrated academic literacy approach to improving students’ understanding of plagiarism in an accounting course," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 14-34, February.
    2. Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy, 2007. "Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 293-306, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lillian Y. Fok & Dinah M. Payne & Christy M. Corey, 2016. "Cultural Values, Utilitarian Orientation, and Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of U.S. and Puerto Rican Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 263-279, March.
    2. Anne Christensen & Jane Cote & Claire Kamm Latham, 2018. "Developing Ethical Confidence: The Impact of Action-Oriented Ethics Instruction in an Accounting Curriculum," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1157-1175, December.
    3. Muhammad Rhies Khan & Mustaghis-Ur Rahman & Anita Laila & Ali Gohar & Sana Azhar, 2023. "Maintaining Business Ethics during COVID-19 Pandemic in Globalized World: A Comparison of Ethical Theories and Future Research Perspective," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(1), pages 42-49.
    4. Sandra Scott, 2017. "From Plagiarism‐Plagued to Plagiarism‐Proof: Using Anonymized Case Assignments in Intermediate Accounting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 247-268, December.
    5. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2017. "Accounting education literature review (2016)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-31.
    6. Singh, Anil & Mangalaraj, George & Taneja, Aakash, 2011. "An approach to detecting plagiarism in spreadsheet assignments: A digital answer to digital cheating," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 142-152.
    7. Cam Caldwell, 2010. "A Ten-Step Model for Academic Integrity: A Positive Approach for Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Ballantine, J.A. & McCourt Larres, P. & Mulgrew, M., 2014. "Determinants of academic cheating behavior: The future for accountancy in Ireland," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 55-66.
    9. Noer Sasongko* & Mahruf Noor Hasyim & Dahlia Fernandez, 2019. "Analysis of Behavioral Factors that Cause Student Academic Fraud," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 830-837, 03-2019.
    10. Joanne Jones & Gary Spraakman, 2011. "A Case of Academic Misconduct: Does Self‐Interest Rule?," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3861-:d:527594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.