IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3292-d518678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Severity Matrix for Sustainable Public-Private Partnership Projects in Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Shabir Hussain Khahro

    (Department of Engineering Management, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tauha Hussain Ali

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Sindh 76062, Pakistan)

  • Shafiqul Hassan

    (College of Law, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Noor Yasmin Zainun

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering & Built Environment, Jamilus Research Center, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja 86400, Malaysia)

  • Yasir Javed

    (Department of Computer System, College of Information Technology, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Shahbaz Aziz Memon

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Sindh 76062, Pakistan)

Abstract

The concept of a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is not new for developing countries, although many initiatives are being contemplated for potential implementation. This paper evaluates the crucial success factor for the effective execution of PPP projects and it also investigates the appropriate distribution of the risks involved in PPP projects. Quartile analysis of features has been made after a detailed literature review for risk identification. The risk severity analysis is done using a quartile assessment. The data is collected from various contractors working on PPP projects in Pakistan. The comparative analysis has been conducted using available research work on PPP in developing countries. A risk severity rank model is created using 47 key risks in PPP projects for developing countries. Finally, the top risks identified by this research are compared with the previous studies conducted in China, India and Egypt. It is concluded that inflation, revenue risk from end-user, foreign exchange fluctuation, political situation, law and order, and corruption are the major risks in developing countries for better management of PPP projects. Most of the PPP projects are public-oriented. The society of any city is directly affected by most PPP projects. This paper presents the identified key risks of PPP projects in developing countries which are mostly financial and public-oriented. This work will support the PPP concept significance, meeting United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8 and 11. Recent countries’ political and economic circumstances and sustainability have transformed PPP ventures into a successful way to support the governments to develop roads, energy and facilities through private partners’ financial and technological capacities. Although PPP is used worldwide, its effective utilization in developing countries is still lacking. This paper is an enhancement to its successful use of the PPP domain for developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabir Hussain Khahro & Tauha Hussain Ali & Shafiqul Hassan & Noor Yasmin Zainun & Yasir Javed & Shahbaz Aziz Memon, 2021. "Risk Severity Matrix for Sustainable Public-Private Partnership Projects in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3292-:d:518678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Lakshya & Jindal, Apurva & Velaga, Nagendra R., 2018. "Financial risk assessment and modelling of PPP based Indian highway infrastructure projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 2-11.
    2. Alireza Valipour & Hadi Sarvari & Jolanta Tamošaitiene, 2018. "Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guoxian Cao & Chaoyang Guo & Hezhong Li, 2022. "Risk Analysis of Public–Private Partnership Waste-to-Energy Incineration Projects from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Dursun Balkan & Goknur Arzu Akyuz, 2023. "Logistics Sector Turnover: Forecasting for Turkey, EU27 and EA19 under Effects of COVID-19," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Xue Xu & Min Zhao & Xiaoya Li & Chao Song, 2022. "A Study on the Risk Assessment of Water Conservancy Scenic Spot PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Tarek Zayed & Hassan El Fathali & Ghasan Alfalah & Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Osama Moselhi, 2023. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for the Assessment of Public Private Partnerships in Transportation Projects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-41, August.
    5. Yajing Zhang & Weijian Jin & Jingfeng Yuan, 2023. "Policy Perspective on Governmental Implicit Debt Risks of Urban Rail Transit PPP Projects in China: A Grounded Theory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michal Gluszak & Remigiusz Gawlik & Malgorzata Zieba, 2019. "Smart and Green Buildings Features in the Decision-Making Hierarchy of Office Space Tenants: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Nicole B. Baker & Christian Haddad, 2024. "Private ownership and management control decisions in infrastructure from the perspective of Transaction Cost Theory: Evidence from emerging economies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 764-791, July.
    3. Hadi Sarvari & Alireza Valipour & Nordin Yahya & Norhazilan MD Noor & Michael Beer & Nerija Banaitiene, 2019. "Approaches to Risk Identification in Public–Private Partnership Projects: Malaysian Private Partners’ Overview," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Jokar, Ebrahim & Aminnejad, Babak & Lork, Alireza, 2021. "Assessing and Prioritizing Risks in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects Using the Integration of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    5. Hadi Sarvari & Mansooreh Rakhshanifar & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Daniel W.M. Chan & Michael Beer, 2019. "A Risk Based Approach to Evaluating the Impacts of Zayanderood Drought on Sustainable Development Indicators of Riverside Urban in Isfahan-Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Mohammad Heydari & Kin Keung Lai & Victor Shi & Feng Xiao, 2023. "Public Health Risk Evaluation through Mathematical Optimization in the Process of PPPs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Yorela Yenifer Esperilla-Niño-de-Guzmán & María de los Ángeles Baeza-Muñoz & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2024. "Public–Private Partnership (PPP) in Road Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Evolution, Approaches, and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "A Review on Risk Management in Information Systems: Risk Policy, Control and Fraud Detection," Post-Print hal-03741848, HAL.
    9. Kangsoo Kim & Hyejin Cho & Donghyung Yook, 2019. "Financing for a Sustainable PPP Development: Valuation of the Contractual Rights under Exercise Conditions for an Urban Railway PPP Project in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Vergara-Novoa, Cristian & Sepúlveda-Rojas, Juan Pedro & Alfaro, Miguel D. & Soto, Pablo & Benitez-Fuentes, Paulo Andrés, 2020. "Analysis of revenues, costs and average costs of highway concessions in Chile," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 114-123.
    11. Xinhua Mao & Jiahua Gan & Xilong Zhao, 2019. "Debt Risk Evaluation of Toll Freeways in Mainland China Using the Grey Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Huang, Xingjun & Lin, Yun & Lim, Ming K. & Zhou, Fuli & Ding, Rui & Zhang, Zusheng, 2022. "Evolutionary dynamics of promoting electric vehicle-charging infrastructure based on public–private partnership cooperation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    13. Asheem Shrestha & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Igor Martek & M Reza Hosseini & David J Edwards, 2019. "A Principal-Agent Theory Perspective on PPP Risk Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Toriqul Bashar & Ivan W. H. Fung & Lara Celine Jaillon & Di Wang, 2021. "Major Obstacles to Public-Private Partnership (PPP)-Financed Infrastructure Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Huaiwen ZHANG & Adnan Khurshid & Xinyu WANG & Alina Mirela BĂLTĂŢEANU, 2021. "Corporate Financial Risk Assessment and Role of Big Data; New Perspective Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 181-199, June.
    16. Longsheng Cheng & Mahboubeh Shadabfar & Arash Sioofy Khoojine, 2023. "A State-of-the-Art Review of Probabilistic Portfolio Management for Future Stock Markets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-34, February.
    17. Beenish Bakhtawar & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Husnain Arshad & Salman Tariq & Khwaja Mateen Mazher & Tarek Zayed & Naheed Akhtar, 2021. "A Sustainability-Based Risk Assessment for P3 Projects Using a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Skvarciany Viktorija & Germanaitė Laura, 2019. "Financial Risk Assessment: Case of „Lietuvos Geležinkeliai“, AB," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 19-29, January.
    19. Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Hadi Sarvari & Daniel W. M. Chan & Matteo Cristofaro, 2020. "Assessing the Barriers and Risks to Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure Construction Projects in Developing Countries of Middle East," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Qi Jun & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Stochastic hybrid decision‐making based on interval type 2 fuzzy sets for measuring the innovation capacities of financial institutions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 573-593, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3292-:d:518678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.