IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16625-d1000820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Risk Assessment of Water Conservancy Scenic Spot PPP Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Xue Xu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 210000, China)

  • Min Zhao

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 210000, China
    Jiangsu Provincial Research Center for Water Resources and Sustainable Development, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Xiaoya Li

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 210000, China)

  • Chao Song

    (Wuwei Power Supply Company, State Grid Corporation of China, Wuhu 238300, China)

Abstract

The water conservancy scenic spot is an important part of China’s water ecological civilization construction and is an important way to transform “clear water and green mountains” into “mountains of gold and silver”. The current development of the water conservancy scenic spot is limited by the conditions of capital, management, and technology. The PPP model, as a means of introducing these elements, is an effective way to realize the marketization, characterization, and high-quality development of water conservancy scenic spots. Due to the particularity and complexity of water conservancy scenic spots, the PPP model, and their combination, the risks in water conservancy scenic spot PPP projects are more complicated. Identification and assessment, as well as response, are necessary ways to reduce project risks. In this paper, the risk evaluation index system and the DEMATEL-ANP-FUZZY risk evaluation model of the water conservancy scenic spot PPP project are put forward and, then, the key risk factors, causal relationship between the factors, and risk level of the project are obtained in combination with case analysis. The results show that risks in construction and operation, as well as political and economic risks, are the key risk factors in the water conservancy scenic spot PPP project, and the natural, economic and political risk factors are the main causes of project risk. Risks in construction and operation, as well as organizational and social risks, are the main affected factors. Further analysis shows that the political and economic factors are the key points to focus on when attempting to reduce the project risk, and suggestions are provided, such as improving the legal and regulatory framework, establishing a reasonable risk-sharing and social capital withdrawal mechanism, unblocking social capital participation channels, and strengthening financial support. This could provide a reference for the risk management of water conservancy scenic spot PPP projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue Xu & Min Zhao & Xiaoya Li & Chao Song, 2022. "A Study on the Risk Assessment of Water Conservancy Scenic Spot PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16625-:d:1000820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Tauha Hussain Ali & Shafiqul Hassan & Noor Yasmin Zainun & Yasir Javed & Shahbaz Aziz Memon, 2021. "Risk Severity Matrix for Sustainable Public-Private Partnership Projects in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Anjali R. Virkar & Prita D. Mallya, 2018. "A Review of Dimensions of Tourism Transport Affecting Tourist Satisfaction," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(1), pages 72-80, January.
    3. Jokar, Ebrahim & Aminnejad, Babak & Lork, Alireza, 2021. "Assessing and Prioritizing Risks in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects Using the Integration of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    4. Karol Witkowski, 2022. "The Development of the Use of Water Energy in the Mountain Catchment from a Sociohydrological Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Yan Li & Xinyu Wang, 2018. "Risk assessment for public–private partnership projects: using a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process method and expert opinion in China," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 952-973, August.
    6. Zhansheng Liu & Yueyue Jiao & Anxiu Li & Ximei Liu, 2021. "Risk Assessment of Urban Rail Transit PPP Project Construction Based on Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Xiaoyan Jiang & Kun Lu & Bo Xia & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui, 2019. "Identifying Significant Risks and Analyzing Risk Relationship for Construction PPP Projects in China Using Integrated FISM-MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    8. Yuan Gao & Chun Kit Lau, 2021. "Risk Assessment of Urban Rail Transit Project Using Interpretative Structural Modelling: Evidence from China," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, February.
    9. Yaqiong Zhang & Nan He & Yijing Li & Yiyang Chen & Lei Wang & Yunlong Ran & Baogui Xin, 2021. "Risk Assessment of Water Environment Treatment PPP Projects Based on a Cloud Model," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guoxian Cao & Chaoyang Guo & Hezhong Li, 2022. "Risk Analysis of Public–Private Partnership Waste-to-Energy Incineration Projects from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Glykeria Myrovali & Maria Morfoulaki & Thomai Mpaltzi, 2023. "Can Destination Cards Help to Shape Areas’ Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Junlong Peng & Jing Zhou & Fanyi Meng & Yan Yu, 2021. "Analysis on the hidden cost of prefabricated buildings based on FISM-BN," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Ram, Yael & Gal-Tzur, Ayelet & Rechavi, Amit, 2021. "Identifying attributes of public transport services for urban tourists: A data-mining method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. André Luiz Romano & Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira & Sandra Sofia F. S. Caeiro, 2021. "Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Yang Wang & Qingying Li & Jian Zuo & Katharine Bartsch, 2022. "How Did Balance Loss Occur? A Cross-stakeholder Analysis of Risk Misallocation in a Sponge City PPP Project," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 5225-5240, October.
    7. Yajing Zhang & Weijian Jin & Jingfeng Yuan, 2023. "Policy Perspective on Governmental Implicit Debt Risks of Urban Rail Transit PPP Projects in China: A Grounded Theory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Filda Rahmiati & Norfaridatul Akmaliah Othman & Md Nor Hayati Tahir, 2020. "Examining the Trip Experience on Competitive Advantage Creation in Tourism," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 15-30.
    9. Dan Su & Yi-Sheng Liu & Xin-Tong Li & Xiao-Yan Chen & Dong-Han Li, 2020. "Management Path of Concrete Beam Bridge in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Jinglin Zhang & Wei Zhang & Dongsheng Li & Xueliang Chen & Wei Zhang, 2022. "Regime Shifts in the Hexi Oases over the Past Three Decades: The Case of the Linze Oasis in the Middle Reaches of the Heihe River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Manel Elmsalmi & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid, 2021. "Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Steiner, Alexandre Arns & Franco, David Gabriel de Barros & Nara, Elpídio Oscar Benitez & Steiner, Maria Teresinha Arns, 2023. "Creating technical criteria for the hierarchization of public works: Case study in Paraná state, Brazil," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    14. Tan, Karen Pei-Sze & Yang, Yang & Li, Xiang (Robert), 2022. "Catching a ride in the peer-to-peer economy: Tourists’ acceptance and use of ridesharing services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 504-518.
    15. Qianqian Zhou & Yuhui Bao & Yiwei Zhao & Xinyao He & Caiyun Cui & Yong Liu, 2022. "Impacts of Government Credit on Government Performance of Public-Private Partnership Project in China: A WSR System Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Liu, Jiaqi & Liu, Jicai & Bu, Zehui & Zhou, Yining & He, Peifen, 2022. "Path analysis of influencing government's excessive behavior in PPP project: Based on field dynamic theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 522-540.
    17. Bisola Beatrice Oguejiofor & Ngozi Samuel Uzougbo & Abosede Olusade Kolade & Ahmed Raji & Chibuike Daraojimba, 2023. "Review of Successful Global Public-Private Partnerships: Extracting key Strategies for Effective U.S. Financial Collaborations," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(8), pages 312-331, August.
    18. Wen-Kuo Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Suresh Ma & Mei-Min Lin & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "An Exploration of the Critical Risk Factors in Sustainable Telecom Services: An Analysis of Indian Telecom Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Cláudia Miranda Veloso & Cícero Eduardo Walter & Bruno Sousa & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira & Vasco Santos & Marco Valeri, 2021. "Academic Tourism and Transport Services: Student Perceptions from a Social Responsibility Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Alina Viorica Dumitrașcu & Camelia Teodorescu & Alexandra Cioclu, 2023. "Accessibility and Tourist Satisfaction—Influencing Factors for Tourism in Dobrogea, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16625-:d:1000820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.