IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2028-d498821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism Development in Post-Industrial Facilities as a Regional Business Model

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Jóźwiak

    (Department of Organizational Innovation Management, Faculty of Management, UTP University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 430 Fordońska St, 85-790 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Patrycja Sieg

    (Department of Organizational Innovation Management, Faculty of Management, UTP University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 430 Fordońska St, 85-790 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

In the article presented, the authors have attempted to define the development of post-industrial facilities, on the example of a thematic trail located in Bydgoszcz, as well as to assess the impact of this route on the city’s attractiveness. The TeH 2 O thematic trail is an example of a business model that utilizes post-industrial facilities for the development of a business partnership between the route facilities, the objects located in the vicinity, as well as the route participants. The article discusses the use of post-industrial facilities for tourist purposes and the legal aspects associated with the process of transforming such facilities. This paper presents the results of a research carried out on two groups of respondents, i.e., the residents of the city of Bydgoszcz and the tourists who have visited or are about to visit the city of Bydgoszcz. As a result of the research carried out, it has been found that the thematic trail examined affects the attractiveness of the city of Bydgoszcz. Both the respondents from the city of Bydgoszcz as well as the tourists visiting the city acknowledged it. The TeH 2 O thematic trail is more popular among the inhabitants of Bydgoszcz than among the visitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Jóźwiak & Patrycja Sieg, 2021. "Tourism Development in Post-Industrial Facilities as a Regional Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2028-:d:498821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junghee Han & Almas Heshmati & Masoomeh Rashidghalam, 2020. "Circular Economy Business Models with a Focus on Servitization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Simona KLEINHEMPEL & Stefan Ioan NITCHI & Lucia RUSU, 2010. "Business Process Management in Service-Oriented Companies," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 189-198.
    3. Richard W. Butler & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Incorporating the Value Proposition for Society with Business Models of Health Tourism Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Zbigniew Malara & Pawel Ziembicki, 2020. "Information gap in value propositions of business models of language schools," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 30(2), pages 59-76.
    5. Zygmunt Kruczek & Adam R. Szromek, 2020. "The Identification of Values in Business Models of Tourism Enterprises in the Context of the Phenomenon of Overtourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Jiří Mazurek & Konrad Kulakowski, 2020. "Information gap in value propositions of business models of language schools," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 30(2), pages 77-89.
    7. Xie, Philip Feifan, 2015. "A life cycle model of industrial heritage development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 141-154.
    8. Krzysztof Widawski & Piotr Oleśniewicz, 2019. "Thematic Tourist Trails: Sustainability Assessment Methodology. The Case of Land Flowing with Milk and Honey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    10. Gniewko Niedbała & Anna Jęczmyk & Ryszard Steppa & Jarosław Uglis, 2020. "Linking of Traditional Food and Tourism. The Best Pork of Wielkopolska—Culinary Tourist Trail: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Adam R. Szromek & Krzysztof Herman, 2019. "A Business Creation in Post-Industrial Tourism Objects: Case of the Industrial Monuments Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Kuzior & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Aleksy Kwilinski & Dariusz Krawczyk, 2021. "Post-Industrial Tourism as a Driver of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zygmunt Kruczek & Adam R. Szromek, 2020. "The Identification of Values in Business Models of Tourism Enterprises in the Context of the Phenomenon of Overtourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    3. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    4. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    5. Francesca Nocca & Martina Bosone & Manuel Orabona, 2024. "Multicriteria Evaluation Framework for Industrial Heritage Adaptive Reuse: The Role of the ‘Intrinsic Value’," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    6. KhalifAbdi Maalim & Peterson Obara Magutu & James Mauti Mose, 2019. "E-Procurement Strategies And Supply Chain Performance Of Private Hospitals In Nairobi, Kenya," Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 4(11), pages 145-156, November.
    7. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Business model innovation within SPOs: Exploring the antecedents and mechanisms facilitating multi-level value co-creation within a value-network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 475-494.
    9. Baoliang Hu & Wei Huang & Shuai Yan & Guang Liu & Tao Zhang, 2020. "Business Model Design and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Customer Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    11. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    12. Tommaso Elli & Alessandra Spagnoli & Valeria Maria Iannilli, 2024. "Mapping Service-Based Retailing to Improve Sustainability Practices in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Sheth, Ananya & Sinfield, Joseph V., 2022. "An analytical framework to compare innovation strategies and identify simple rules," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Jianyu Zhao & Yining Huang & Xi Xi & Shanshan Wang, 2021. "How knowledge heterogeneity influences business model design: mediating effects of strategic learning and bricolage," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 889-919, June.
    17. Eleonora Annunziata & Francesco Rizzi & Tiberio Daddi & Marco Frey, 2019. "Business models for interfirm energy cooperation in industrial parks: A possible taxonomy," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 133-148.
    18. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    19. In Hyeock (Ian) Lee, 2022. "Startups, relocation, and firm performance: a transaction cost economics perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 205-224, January.
    20. Wenyao Zhang & Tugrul Daim & Qingpu Zhang, 2019. "Exploring the Multi-Phase Driven Process for Disruptive Business Model Innovation of E-Business Microcredit: a Multiple Case Study from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 590-617, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2028-:d:498821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.