IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1874-d496321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventive Maintenance Model for National School Buildings in Indonesia Using a Constraint Programming Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Shun Liu

    (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan)

  • Muhammad Faizal Ardhiansyah Arifin

    (Graduate School of Engineering Science and Technology, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan
    Department of Civil Engineering, Semarang State University, Semarang 50229, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Indonesian government needs to maintain around 231,000 school buildings in active use. Such a portfolio of buildings given the diversity of locations, limited maintenance budget, and deterioration rates varied by different building conditions presents many challenges to effective maintenance planning. Many of those schools had been reported to be aging and in a degenerated condition. However, contemporary practice for the planning method of Indonesia’s building maintenance program applies reactive maintenance strategies with a single linear deterioration rate. Such methodology cannot properly guarantee the sustainability of those school buildings. Therefore, this study attempts to examine a different approach to Indonesia’s building maintenance planning by adopting a preventive maintenance strategy using the deterioration rate model proved by historical data from a previous study. This study develops an optimization model with varied deterioration rates and considers the budget limitation, by utilizing a Constraint Programming (CP) approach. The proposed model achieves the minimum maintenance cost for a real case of 41 school buildings under different deterioration rates to ensure adequate building conditions and maintain expected levels of service. Finally, research analysis also proves that this new preventive maintenance model has potential to deliver superior capability for assisting building maintenance decisions in Indonesia’s government.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Shun Liu & Muhammad Faizal Ardhiansyah Arifin, 2021. "Preventive Maintenance Model for National School Buildings in Indonesia Using a Constraint Programming Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1874-:d:496321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1874/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1874/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abolfazl Farahani & Holger Wallbaum & Jan-Olof Dalenbäck, 2019. "Optimized maintenance and renovation scheduling in multifamily buildings – a systematic approach based on condition state and life cycle cost of building components," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 139-155, March.
    2. Per Anker Jensen & Esmir Maslesa & Jakob Brinkø Berg, 2018. "Sustainable Building Renovation: Proposals for a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Fang-Jye Shiue & Meng-Cong Zheng & Hsin-Yun Lee & Akhmad F.K. Khitam & Pei-Ying Li, 2019. "Renovation Construction Process Scheduling for Long-Term Performance of Buildings: An Application Case of University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Nahyun Kwon & Kwonsik Song & Moonseo Park & Youjin Jang & Inseok Yoon & Yonghan Ahn, 2019. "Preliminary Service Life Estimation Model for MEP Components Using Case-Based Reasoning and Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beata Nowogońska & Magdalena Mielczarek, 2021. "Renovation Management Method in Neglected Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Beata Nowogońska, 2020. "Consequences of Abandoning Renovation: Case Study—Neglected Industrial Heritage Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Rita Remeikienė & Ligita Gasparėnienė & Aleksandra Fedajev & Marek Szarucki & Marija Đekić & Jolita Razumienė, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development Progress in EU Member States in the Context of Building Renovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Sojin Park & Nahyun Kwon & Yonghan Ahn, 2019. "Forecasting Repair Schedule for Building Components Based on Case-Based Reasoning and Fuzzy-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Guorui Chen & Li Cheng & Foyuan Li, 2022. "Integrating Sustainability and Users’ Demands in the Retrofit of a University Campus in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Richarz, Jan & Henn, Sarah & Osterhage, Tanja & Müller, Dirk, 2022. "Optimal scheduling of modernization measures for typical non-residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    7. Fabian Dunke & Stefan Nickel, 2023. "A matheuristic for customized multi-level multi-criteria university timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(2), pages 1313-1348, September.
    8. Dar-Li Yang & Wen-Hung Kuo, 2019. "Minimizing Makespan in A Two-Machine Flowshop Problem with Processing Time Linearly Dependent on Job Waiting Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Diego Alexis Ramos Huarachi & Cleiton Hluszko & Micaela Ines Castillo Ulloa & Vinicius Moretti & Julio Abraham Ramos Quispe & Fabio Neves Puglieri & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2023. "Life Cycle Thinking for a Circular Bioeconomy: Current Development, Challenges, and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    10. Zhou Li & Jiahui Diao & Shaoming Lu & Cong Tao & Jonathan Krauth, 2022. "Exploring a Sustainable Approach to Vernacular Dwelling Spaces with a Multiple Evidence Base Method: A Case Study of the Bai People’s Courtyard Houses in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Guirec Ruellan & Mario Cools & Shady Attia, 2021. "Analysis of the Determining Factors for the Renovation of the Walloon Residential Building Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Fang-Jye Shiue & Meng-Cong Zheng & Hsin-Yun Lee & Akhmad F.K. Khitam & Pei-Ying Li, 2019. "Renovation Construction Process Scheduling for Long-Term Performance of Buildings: An Application Case of University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Petkov, Ivalin & Mavromatidis, Georgios & Knoeri, Christof & Allan, James & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2022. "MANGOret: An optimization framework for the long-term investment planning of building multi-energy system and envelope retrofits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    14. Yuri Seki & Ayokunle Olubunmi Olanipekun & Monty Sutrisna, 2022. "End-User Stakeholder Engagement in Refurbishment Design in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Streicher, Kai Nino & Berger, Matthias & Panos, Evangelos & Narula, Kapil & Soini, Martin Christoph & Patel, Martin K., 2021. "Optimal building retrofit pathways considering stock dynamics and climate change impacts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1874-:d:496321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.