IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p512-d476366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Bicycle-on-Board Transit Choice in a University Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Greg Rybarczyk

    (College of Arts and Sciences, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI 48502, USA
    Michigan Institute for Data Science (MIDAS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA
    The Centre for Urban Design and Mental Health, London SW9 7QF, UK)

  • Richard R. Shaker

    (Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
    Graduate Programs in Environmental Applied Science & Management, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
    Graduate Program in Spatial Analysis, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
    Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14261, USA)

Abstract

Bicycles-on-board (BoB) transit is a popular travel demand management (TDM) tool across many U.S. cities and universities, yet research on this mode within a university environment remains minimal. The purpose of this research is to investigate how personal and neighborhood factors influence this travel choice in a university setting. Relying on attitudinal data from a stated preference survey, this study examined the effect of personal characteristics and seven key neighborhood conditions on the willingness to utilize BoB for the “first mile” of the journey to campus. The study used exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA), a discrete choice modeling framework, and geovisualizations to understand the likelihood of choosing this mode among a university population in Flint, Michigan, USA. The results revealed that the majority of constituents were not interested in BoB, aside from a cluster near the commercial business district. Also of note was that long commutes, and reduced access to parks and bicycle facilities dissuaded people from choosing this mode. Surprisingly, a neighborhood’s walkability or bikeability had no effect on respondent’s interest in using BoB. Lastly, the geovisualizations showcased where localized interventions may effectively increase this mode choice in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Greg Rybarczyk & Richard R. Shaker, 2021. "Predicting Bicycle-on-Board Transit Choice in a University Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:512-:d:476366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/512/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/512/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kager, R. & Bertolini, L. & Te Brömmelstroet, M., 2016. "Characterisation of and reflections on the synergy of bicycles and public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 208-219.
    2. Roland Kager & Lucas Harms, 2017. "Synergies from Improved Cycling-Transit Integration: Towards an Integrated Urban Mobility System," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2017/23, OECD Publishing.
    3. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2003. "Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6zr1x95m, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Liang Ma & Jason Cao, 2019. "How perceptions mediate the effects of the built environment on travel behavior?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 175-197, February.
    5. Yanjie Ji & Xinwei Ma & Mingyuan Yang & Yuchuan Jin & Liangpeng Gao, 2018. "Exploring Spatially Varying Influences on Metro-Bikeshare Transfer: A Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Cervero, R. & Duncan, M., 2003. "Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1478-1483.
    7. Oostendorp, Rebekka & Gebhardt, Laura, 2018. "Combining means of transport as a users' strategy to optimize traveling in an urban context: empirical results on intermodal travel behavior from a survey in Berlin," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 72-83.
    8. Luc Anselin & Xun Li, 2019. "Operational local join count statistics for cluster detection," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 189-210, June.
    9. Stephen Matthews & Tse-Chuan Yang, 2012. "Mapping the results of local statistics," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 26(6), pages 151-166.
    10. Weliwitiya, Hesara & Rose, Geoffrey & Johnson, Marilyn, 2019. "Bicycle train intermodality: Effects of demography, station characteristics and the built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 395-404.
    11. Mahbubur Meenar & Bradley Flamm & Kevin Keenan, 2019. "Mapping the Emotional Experience of Travel to Understand Cycle-Transit User Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Hiroaki Suzuki & Robert Cervero & Kanako Iuchi, 2013. "Transforming Cities with Transit : Transit and Land-Use Integration for Sustainable Urban Development [Transformando las ciudades con el transporte público : integración del transporte público y el," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 12233.
    13. Zhao, Pengjun & Li, Shengxiao, 2017. "Bicycle-metro integration in a growing city: The determinants of cycling as a transfer mode in metro station areas in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 46-60.
    14. Yang, Hongtai & Lu, Xiaozhao & Cherry, Christopher & Liu, Xiaohan & Li, Yanlai, 2017. "Spatial variations in active mode trip volume at intersections: a local analysis utilizing geographically weighted regression," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 184-194.
    15. Rybarczyk, Greg & Gallagher, Laura, 2014. "Measuring the potential for bicycling and walking at a metropolitan commuter university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hosseinzadeh, Aryan & Algomaiah, Majeed & Kluger, Robert & Li, Zhixia, 2021. "Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter trips," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Dandan Xu & Yang Bian & Shinan Shu, 2020. "Research on the Psychological Model of Free-floating Bike-Sharing Using Behavior: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Umer Mansoor & Mohammad Tamim Kashifi & Fazal Rehman Safi & Syed Masiur Rahman, 2022. "A review of factors and benefits of non-motorized transport: a way forward for developing countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1560-1582, February.
    4. Xueying Wu & Yi Lu & Yaoyu Lin & Yiyang Yang, 2019. "Measuring the Destination Accessibility of Cycling Transfer Trips in Metro Station Areas: A Big Data Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Zhan, Zilin & Guo, Yuanyuan & Noland, Robert B. & He, Sylvia Y. & Wang, Yacan, 2023. "Analysis of links between dockless bikeshare and metro trips in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Trichês Lucchesi, Shanna & Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Bettella Cybis, Helena Beatriz & Abreu e Silva, João António de & Arellana, Julian Alberto, 2021. "Are people willing to pay more to live in a walking environment? A multigroup analysis of the impact of walkability on real estate values and their moderation effects in two Global South cities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Du, Fangye & Mao, Liang & Wang, Jiaoe, 2021. "Determinants of travel mode choice for seeking healthcare: A comparison between elderly and non-elderly patients," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Liu, Yang & Feng, Tao & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Mingwei, 2022. "Understanding the route choice behaviour of metro-bikeshare users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 460-475.
    9. Dongdong Feng & Lin Cheng & Mingyang Du, 2020. "Exploring the Impact of Dockless Bikeshare on Docked Bikeshare—A Case Study in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Agnieszka Morawiak & Joanna Żukowska, 2020. "Cycling as a Sustainable Transport Alternative in Polish Cittaslow Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Marina Lagune-Reutler & Andrew Guthrie & Yingling Fan & David Levinson, 2015. "Transit Riders' Perception of Waiting Time and Stops' Surrounding Environments," Working Papers 000142, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    12. Devin McNally & Rachel Tillinghast & Hiroyuki Iseki, 2022. "Bicycle Accessibility GIS Analysis for Bike Master Planning with a Consideration of Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) and Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Peters, Luke & MacKenzie, Don, 2019. "The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for policy and system design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 208-226.
    15. Singh, Abhilash C. & Faghih Imani, Ahmadreza & Sivakumar, Aruna & Luna Xi, Yang & Miller, Eric J., 2024. "A joint analysis of accessibility and household trip frequencies by travel mode," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    16. Irina Tumini & Paula Villagra-Islas & Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke, 2017. "Evaluating reconstruction effects on urban resilience: a comparison between two Chilean tsunami-prone cities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1363-1392, February.
    17. Chandra, Shailesh & Jimenez, Jose & Radhakrishnan, Ramalingam, 2017. "Accessibility evaluations for nighttime walking and bicycling for low-income shift workers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 97-108.
    18. Paula Villagra & Carolina Quintana, 2017. "Disaster Governance for Community Resilience in Coastal Towns: Chilean Case Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Rybarczyk, Greg & Gallagher, Laura, 2014. "Measuring the potential for bicycling and walking at a metropolitan commuter university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Ding, Yue & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Pérez-Guzmán, Sofía & Wojtowicz, Jeffrey & Conway, Alison, 2024. "Multi-criteria assessment and ranking framework for the potential of cargo cycle operation: Using New York city as an example," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:512-:d:476366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.