IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13694-d700282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Cost and Schedule Growths of Road Construction Projects, Considering Project Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Kang-Wook Lee

    (Post-Construction Evaluation and Management Center, Department of Construction Policy Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Korea)

  • Kyong-Hoon Kim

    (Post-Construction Evaluation and Management Center, Department of Construction Policy Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Korea)

Abstract

The development of road infrastructure is closely related to national competitiveness and presents significant socioeconomic impacts. However, road construction involves a large budget and is vulnerable to political, economic, social, and project-specific risks, which often result in cost overruns and schedule delays. Assessing the gap between the final performance and the planned performance, and providing feedback to similar projects in the future is essential for successful project planning and management. The aim of this study is to empirically analyze the cost and schedule growth of road construction projects, considering project characteristics. Using the national-level project performance data, the primary goal is to answer, “Do project characteristics influence the road project performance? If so, how different is the performance because of the project characteristics?” To this end, this study analyzes the cost and schedule growth of 423 road construction projects, considering five project characteristics: facility type, construction type, bid type, contract type, and project size. Non-parametric tests (the Mann–Whitney U test and the Kruskal–Wallis test) are used to analyze the differences between sample groups. The results demonstrate (1) better management of the performance of the highway when compared to the national and provincial roads; (2) higher schedule growth of the expansion and renovation than that of the new construction; (3) lower cost growth of the design-build method (turnkey and alternative) than the design-bid-build methods (qualification examination and lowest price); and (4) relatively larger cost and schedule growth for projects over $50 million than those of smaller projects. These results present empirical references from the Korean construction industry that can help construction-related entities (clients, design consultants, and contractors) to estimate and manage the cost and schedule buffers of future projects by considering different project characteristics. Discussions and suggestions connected with the findings are also provided. Future research will continue to shed light on the critical factors affecting the cost and schedule growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang-Wook Lee & Kyong-Hoon Kim, 2021. "Analyzing Cost and Schedule Growths of Road Construction Projects, Considering Project Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13694-:d:700282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13694/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13694/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terence Lam & Keith Gale, 2014. "Highway maintenance: impact of framework agreements upon project financial performance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 460-472, May.
    2. Chao-Hui Wu & Ting-Ya Hsieh & Wen-Lon Cheng & Shih-Tong Lu, 2004. "Grey relation analysis of causes for change orders in highway construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 509-520.
    3. Li, Hongbo & Liu, Yali & Peng, Kaili, 2018. "Characterizing the relationship between road infrastructure and local economy using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 17-25.
    4. Peter Roebeling & Miguel Saraiva & Anna Palla & Ilaria Gnecco & Carla Teotónio & Teresa Fidelis & Filomena Martins & Henrique Alves & João Rocha, 2017. "Assessing the socio-economic impacts of green/blue space, urban residential and road infrastructure projects in the Confluence (Lyon): a hedonic pricing simulation approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(3), pages 482-499, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rubén Dario Acosta-Velásquez & Jeffrey León-Pulido & Alexander García-Pérez & William Stive Fajardo-Moreno & Leonardo Espinosa-Leal, 2022. "Contemporary Management Practice Applying the Dynamic Absorptive Capacity Measurement Model (PM 4 AC) for Improved Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Sandiso NGCOBO & Witness ROYA, 2023. "Effectiveness Of Communication Plan In Small To Medium Enterprises’ Projects Supported By The Department Of Transport In South Africa," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 64-79, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iimi,Atsushi, 2022. "Estimating the Impacts of Transport Corridor Development in Kazakhstan : Applicationof Dynamic Panel Data Models to Firm Registry Data," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10196, The World Bank.
    2. Milenković, Marina & Glavić, Draženko & Maričić, Milica, 2019. "Determining factors affecting congestion pricing acceptability," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 58-74.
    3. Kim, Hyungtai & Ahn, Sanghoon & Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F., 2018. "Transportation infrastructure investment and the location of new manufacturing around South Korea's West Coast Expressway," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 146-154.
    4. Anna Palla & Ilaria Gnecco, 2021. "The Web-GIS TRIG Eau Platform to Assess Urban Flood Mitigation by Domestic Rainwater Harvesting Systems in Two Residential Settlements in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Yang, Yang & Liu, Qing & Chang, Chia-Hsun, 2023. "China-Europe freight transportation under the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic and government restriction measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Baiqing Sun & Ramadhan Kauzen, 2023. "The Impact of Port Infrastructure and Economic Growth in Tanzania: Adopting a Structural Equation Modeling Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    7. Yang Tang & Yongbo Yuan & Boquan Tian, 2023. "Analysis of the Driving Mechanism of Land Comprehensive Carrying Capacity from the Perspective of Urban Renewal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Yunfang Jiang & Shidan Jiang & Tiemao Shi, 2020. "Comparative Study on the Cooling Effects of Green Space Patterns in Waterfront Build-Up Blocks: An Experience from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-29, November.
    9. Zambrano-Monserrate, Manuel A. & Ruano, María Alejandra & Yoong-Parraga, Cristina & Silva, Carlos A., 2021. "Urban green spaces and housing prices in developing countries: A Two-stage quantile spatial regression analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Xingxing Zhao & Yulu Chen & Yanhua Wu & Dongjun Guo & Zhilong Chen, 2024. "Enhancing Urban Landscapes through Underground Space Utilization: Public Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Özer, Mustafa & Canbay, Şerif & Kırca, Mustafa, 2021. "The impact of container transport on economic growth in Turkey: An ARDL bounds testing approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Mendonça, Rita & Roebeling, Peter & Martins, Filomena & Fidélis, Teresa & Teotónio, Carla & Alves, Henrique & Rocha, João, 2020. "Assessing economic instruments to steer urban residential sprawl, using a hedonic pricing simulation modelling approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Wang, Chao & Kim, Yul-Seong & Kim, Chi Yeol, 2021. "Causality between logistics infrastructure and economic development in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 49-58.
    14. Min Su & Miaomiao Guo & Weixin Luan & Feng Pian, 2023. "The Impact of Expressway Development on Industrial Structure in Rugged Terrain: The Case of Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Howard White & Nina Ashley O. Dela Cruz & Ashrita Saran & John Eyers & Denny John & Ella Beveridge & Nina Blöndal, 2021. "Studies of the effectiveness of transport sector interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    16. Marvuglia, Antonino & Koppelaar, Rembrandt & Rugani, Benedetto, 2020. "The effect of green roofs on the reduction of mortality due to heatwaves: Results from the application of a spatial microsimulation model to four European cities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    17. Cheng, Junmei & Chen, Zhenhua, 2021. "Impact of high-speed rail on the operational capacity of conventional rail in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 354-367.
    18. Obwegeser, Nikolaus & Müller, Sune Dueholm, 2018. "Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 1-17.
    19. Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Woraanong Thotongkam & Pornsiri Jongkol & Porntip Rodpon & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2023. "Investigating Parents’ Attitudes towards the Use of Child Restraint Systems by Comparing Non-Users and User Parents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Ştefan Cristian Gherghina & Mihaela Onofrei & Georgeta Vintilă & Daniel Ştefan Armeanu, 2018. "Empirical Evidence from EU-28 Countries on Resilient Transport Infrastructure Systems and Sustainable Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-34, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13694-:d:700282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.