IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13285-d692156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Planning and Residential Segregation in Brazil—The Failure of the “Special Zone of Social Interest” Instrument in Londrina City (PR)

Author

Listed:
  • Eduarda Marques da Costa

    (Center of Geographical Studies and Laboratory of Excellence TERRA, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600276 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ideni Terezinha Antonello

    (Department of Geosciences, Londrina State University, Londrina 10011, Brazil)

Abstract

The objective of this analysis is linked to the discussion of urban residential segregation marked by the Brazilian urban land structure and perpetuated by urban planning instruments at the municipal level. The spatial focus of the study is the municipality of Londrina (state of Paraná/Brazil). We aimed to analyze the relationship between urban zoning and the dynamics of residential segregation, unfolding two foci: verify to what extent the objectives presented in the municipal instrument translate the objectives of the instrument at the federal level (the City Statute–CE) and the national program “My Home, My Life” aimed to provide housing to socially vulnerable populations; the second focus, aims to assess how the planning instrument—the Special Zone of Social Interest (ZEIS), contemplated in the Land Use and Occupation Law and in the Municipal Master Plan of Londrina (PDPML, 2008)—materializes in practice the objectives of promoting equity in access to housing. The results show that although the objectives defined at the federal level are transposed to the municipal level, demonstrating a theoretical coherence between the instruments, there are flaws in their implementation. The case study results show that the urban zoning of Londrina has as a guideline a segregationist territorial ordering, leading to a residential segregation of the population with low purchasing power. On the other hand, the planning instrument that could change this reality is the ZEIS that, on the contrary, reinforced social housing in the periphery, conditioning the right to the city and perpetuating the social vulnerability of disadvantaged groups, in a process common to other Brazilian cities. Such constraints make relevant the establishment of land reserves for social housing based on clear roles of a social and functional mix, reinforced by the combat of vacant spaces and the definition of minimal housing and infrastructure densities to allow urban occupation.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduarda Marques da Costa & Ideni Terezinha Antonello, 2021. "Urban Planning and Residential Segregation in Brazil—The Failure of the “Special Zone of Social Interest” Instrument in Londrina City (PR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13285-:d:692156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucia Shimbo, 2019. "An unprecedented alignment: state, finance, construction and housing production in Brazil since the 2000s," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 337-353, July.
    2. Eduardo Rojas & Nadin Medellín, 2011. "Housing Policy Matters for the Poor: Housing Conditions in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1995-2006," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 59458, Inter-American Development Bank.
    3. Lucia Shimbo, 2019. "An unprecedented alignment: state, finance, construction and housing production in Brazil since the 2000s," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 337-353, July.
    4. Aneta Piekut & Gwilym Pryce & Wouter van Gent, 2019. "Segregation in the Twenty First Century: Processes, Complexities and Future Directions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(3), pages 225-234, July.
    5. Leo Kavanagh & Duncan Lee & Gwilym Pryce, 2016. "Is Poverty Decentralizing? Quantifying Uncertainty in the Decentralization of Urban Poverty," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(6), pages 1286-1298, November.
    6. Paula Freire Santoro, 2019. "Inclusionary housing policies in Latin America: São Paulo, Brazil in dialogue with Bogotá, Colombia," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 385-410, July.
    7. Irene Molina & Darinka Czischke & Raquel Rolnik, 2019. "Housing policy issues in contemporary South America: an introduction," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 277-287, July.
    8. Paula Freire Santoro, 2019. "Inclusionary housing policies in Latin America: São Paulo, Brazil in dialogue with Bogotá, Colombia," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 385-410, July.
    9. Ann Varley, 2017. "Property titles and the urban poor: from informality to displacement?," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 385-404, July.
    10. Rojas, Eduardo & Medellín, Nadin, 2011. "Housing Policy Matters for the Poor: Housing Conditions in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1995-2006," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 3817, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Irene Molina & Darinka Czischke & Raquel Rolnik, 2019. "Housing policy issues in contemporary South America: an introduction," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 277-287, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandra Reyes & Patricia Basile, 2022. "The Distinctive Evolution Of Housing Financialization In Brazil And Mexico," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 933-953, November.
    2. Eduilson Carneiro & Wilza Lopes & Giovana Espindola, 2021. "Linking Urban Sprawl and Surface Urban Heat Island in the Teresina–Timon Conurbation Area in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Ruiz-Tagle, Jaime & Urria, Ignacio, 2022. "Household overcrowding trajectories and mental well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    4. Rodrigo Castriota, 2024. "HOUSING BEYOND THE METROPOLIS: Inhabiting Extractivism and Extensions in Urban Amazonia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 32-52, January.
    5. Claudio M. Rocha, 2023. "Rio 2016 Olympic Legacy for Residents of Favelas: Revisiting the Case of Vila Autódromo Five Years Later," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    7. Ivan Turok & Andreas Scheba & Justin Visagie, 2022. "Can social housing help to integrate divided cities? [Segregation and the urban rich; enclaves, networks and mobilities]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 93-116.
    8. Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio & Lucas, Karen & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2022. "Freedom of choice? Social and spatial disparities on combined housing and transport affordability," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 39-53.
    9. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik, 2023. "Understanding barriers and opportunities for promoting transit-oriented development with bus rapid transit in Bogotá and Quito," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Shin Bin Tan, 2023. "Do ethnic integration policies also improve socio-economic integration? A study of residential segregation in Singapore," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 696-717, March.
    11. Lozano-Gracia, Nancy & Young, Cheryl, 2014. "Housing consumption and urbanization," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7112, The World Bank.
    12. Juan Yan & Marietta Haffner & Marja Elsinga, 2021. "Inclusionary Housing: An Evaluation of a New Public Rental Housing Governance Instrument in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Ann Mitchell & Jimena Macció & Diego Mariño Fages, 2019. "The Effects of Emergency Housing on Wellbeing: Evidence from Argentina’s Informal Settlements," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(3), pages 504-529, July.
    14. Karen Soledad Villanueva-Paredes & Grace Ximena Villanueva-Paredes, 2023. "Policies and Mechanisms of Public Financing for Social Housing in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Gabor, Daniela, 2020. "The Wall Street Consensus," SocArXiv wab8m, Center for Open Science.
    16. Gwilym Owen & Yu Chen & Timothy Birabi & Gwilym Pryce & Hui Song & Bifeng Wang, 2023. "Residential segregation of migrants: Disentangling the intersectional and multiscale segregation of migrants in Shijiazhuang, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 166-182, January.
    17. Richard Harris, 2020. "Visualising the scales of ethnic diversity in London using a multilevel entropy index," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1239-1242, October.
    18. Santos, María Emma, 2019. "Non-monetary indicators to monitor SDG targets 1.2 and 1.4: standards, availability, comparability and quality," Estudios Estadísticos 44452, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. Bailey, Nick & livingston, mark & Chi, Bin, 2023. "Housing and welfare reform, and the suburbanisation of poverty in UK cities, 2011-20," OSF Preprints 6gsjk, Center for Open Science.
    20. Webb, Calum & Bywaters, Paul & Scourfield, Jonathan & McCartan, Claire & Bunting, Lisa & Davidson, Gavin & Morris, Kate, 2020. "Untangling child welfare inequalities and the ‘Inverse Intervention Law’ in England," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13285-:d:692156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.