IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13095-d688471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Link between Modernization, Anthropomorphism and Attitude to Wildlife

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Luis Gomez-Melara

    (Department of Social Anthropology, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, Spain)

  • Rufino Acosta-Naranjo

    (Department of Social Anthropology, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, Spain)

  • Patricia Izar

    (Department of Experimental Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508, Brazil)

  • Shahrul Anuar Mohd Sah

    (School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 1112, Persiaran Sains, Gelugor 11800, Malaysia)

  • Jordi Pladevall

    (University of Girona Foundation: Innovation and Training, University of Girona, 17004 Girona, Spain)

  • Risma Illa Maulany

    (Forestry Department, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Putu Oka Ngakan

    (Forestry Department, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Bonaventura Majolo

    (School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Teresa Romero

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Federica Amici

    (Institute of Biology, Faculty of Life Science, University of Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
    Department of Human Behaviour, Ecology and Culture, Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

Anthropogenic pressure has significantly increased in the last decades, often enhancing conflicts at the human–wildlife interface. Therefore, understanding peoples’ value orientations, attitudes and behavioural intentions towards wildlife is a crucial endeavour to reduce the occurrence of conflicts between humans and wildlife. Previous research in the USA has shown a consistent link between modernization and increased anthropomorphism (i.e., the tendency to attribute human mental or physical characteristics to other entities), leading to positive changes in value orientations, attitudes, and behavioural intentions towards wildlife. In this paper, we aimed to address whether this link is also present in other cultures, by testing participants (N = 741) in five different countries (Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, and Spain). Our study shows that while the positive link between anthropomorphism, positive attitudes and behavioural intentions towards wildlife is universal, the link between modernization and anthropomorphism is culturally mediated. In some countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Spain), modernization increased anthropomorphism, while in others modernization predicted no differences (Brazil) or even a decrease in anthropomorphism (Mexico), ultimately deteriorating individuals’ attitude and behavioural intentions towards wildlife. These results call for caution when generalizing findings from western industrialized countries to inform conservation policies worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Luis Gomez-Melara & Rufino Acosta-Naranjo & Patricia Izar & Shahrul Anuar Mohd Sah & Jordi Pladevall & Risma Illa Maulany & Putu Oka Ngakan & Bonaventura Majolo & Teresa Romero & Federica Amici, 2021. "A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Link between Modernization, Anthropomorphism and Attitude to Wildlife," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13095-:d:688471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Manfredo & Tara L. Teel & Kimberly L. Henry, 2009. "Linking Society and Environment: A Multilevel Model of Shifting Wildlife Value Orientations in the Western United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(2), pages 407-427, June.
    2. Kim-Pong Tam, 2019. "Anthropomorphism of Nature, Environmental Guilt, and Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malgorzata Karpinska-Krakowiak & Lukasz Skowron & Lachezar Ivanov, 2020. "“I Will Start Saving Natural Resources, Only When You Show Me the Planet as a Person in Danger”: The Effects of Message Framing and Anthropomorphism on Pro-Environmental Behaviors that are Viewed as E," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Vasileios J. Kontsiotis & Archimidis Triantafyllidis & Stylianos Telidis & Ioanna Eleftheriadou & Vasilios Liordos, 2021. "The Predictive Ability of Wildlife Value Orientations for Mammal Management Varies with Species Conservation Status and Provenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Alexander Georg Büssing & Maike Schleper & Susanne Menzel, 2018. "Do Pre-service Teachers Dance with Wolves? Subject-Specific Teacher Professional Development in A Recent Biodiversity Conservation Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Chao Wang & Qiuqin Zheng & Haimei Zeng & Riwen Lai & Anxin Xu, 2023. "Can Anthropomorphic Slogans Awaken Tourists’ Environmental Responsibility Behavior? Experimental Study Based on Frame Effect Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    5. Laura Pasca, 2022. "Pride and guilt as mediators in the relationship between connection to nature and pro-environmental intention," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 1-15, November.
    6. L. Boronyak & B. Jacobs & A. Wallach & J. McManus & S. Stone & S. Stevenson & B. Smuts & H. Zaranek, 2022. "Pathways towards coexistence with large carnivores in production systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 47-64, March.
    7. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Minh-Phuong Thi Duong & Ni Putu Wulan Purnama Sari & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2024. "From beauty to belief: The aesthetic and diversity values of plants and pets in shaping biodiversity loss belief among Vietnamese urban residents," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Osman M. Jama & Abdishakur W. Diriye & Abdulhakim M. Abdi, 2023. "Understanding young people’s perception toward forestation as a strategy to mitigate climate change in a post-conflict developing country," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 4787-4811, June.
    9. Marina Ienna & Amelia Rofe & Monica Gendi & Heather E. Douglas & Michelle Kelly & Matthew W. Hayward & Alex Callen & Kaya Klop-Toker & Robert J. Scanlon & Lachlan G. Howell & Andrea S. Griffin, 2022. "The Relative Role of Knowledge and Empathy in Predicting Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Grilli, Gianluca & Notaro, Sandra & Campbell, Danny, 2018. "Including Value Orientations in Choice Models to Estimate Benefits of Wildlife Management Policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 70-81.
    11. Yiping Yang & Le Sun & Buxin Han & Pingping Liu, 2023. "The Trajectory of Anthropomorphism and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Serial Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Rayma Ireri Maldonado Astudillo & Yan Pallac Maldonado Astudillo & Juan Alfonso Méndez Zavala & Claudia Leticia Manzano Jiménez & María Xochitl Astudillo Miller, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Proenvironmental Behaviour in Employees: Evidence in Acapulco, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Jing Shao & Asif Mahmood & Heesup Han, 2021. "Unleashing the Potential Role of CSR and Altruistic Values to Foster Pro-Environmental Behavior by Hotel Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    14. David Mattson & Susan Clark, 2012. "The discourses of incidents: cougars on Mt. Elden and in Sabino Canyon, Arizona," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 315-343, December.
    15. Dongdong Yang & Carolyn A. Lin, 2022. "Are Pandas Effective Ambassadors for Promoting Wildlife Conservation and International Diplomacy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    16. repec:sae:envval:v:29:y:2020:i:3:p:317-337 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Larry M. Gigliotti & Lily A. Sweikert & Louis Cornicelli & David C. Fulton, 2020. "Minnesota landowners’ trust in their department of natural resources, salient values similarity and wildlife value orientations," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 577-587, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13095-:d:688471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.