IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04036-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From beauty to belief: The aesthetic and diversity values of plants and pets in shaping biodiversity loss belief among Vietnamese urban residents

Author

Listed:
  • Quan-Hoang Vuong

    (Phenikaa University)

  • Minh-Phuong Thi Duong

    (Ton Duc Thang University)

  • Ni Putu Wulan Purnama Sari

    (Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University)

  • Viet-Phuong La

    (Phenikaa University
    Vuong & Associates)

  • Minh-Hoang Nguyen

    (Phenikaa University)

Abstract

Aesthetics is a crucial ecosystem service provided by biodiversity, which is believed to help improve humans’ quality of life and is linked to environmental consciousness and pro-environmental behaviors. However, how aesthetic experience induced by plants/animals influences the belief in the occurrence and significance of biodiversity loss among urban residents remains understudied. Thus, the current study aimed to examine how the diversity of pets and in-house plants affect urban residents’ belief in biodiversity loss in different scenarios of aesthetic experiences (positive and negative aesthetic experiences at home due to plants/animals). Using the Bayesian Mindsponge Framework (BMF) analytics on a dataset of 535 Vietnamese urban residents, we found that the people’s aesthetic feeling about their house induced by plants/animals is positively associated with their belief in the occurrence and significance of biodiversity loss. The diversity of plants and pets is also positively associated with the level of biodiversity loss belief, but the effect is conditional on the aesthetic experience of the urban residents. Specifically, the positive association between species diversity and the belief only appears when urban residents feel that their houses’ aesthetics are negatively affected by plants/animals. Moreover, the association between pet diversity and biodiversity loss belief is less significant and reliable than that of plant diversity. These findings suggest that raising the houses’ aesthetics through in-house planting or pet ownership can potentially enhance biodiversity loss belief and subsequently build an eco-surplus culture among urban residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan-Hoang Vuong & Minh-Phuong Thi Duong & Ni Putu Wulan Purnama Sari & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2024. "From beauty to belief: The aesthetic and diversity values of plants and pets in shaping biodiversity loss belief among Vietnamese urban residents," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04036-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04036-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04036-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04036-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Manfredo & Tara L. Teel & Kimberly L. Henry, 2009. "Linking Society and Environment: A Multilevel Model of Shifting Wildlife Value Orientations in the Western United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(2), pages 407-427, June.
    2. Anastasia Konstantinova & Victor Matasov & Anna Filyushkina & Viacheslav Vasenev, 2021. "Perceived Benefits and Costs of Owning a Pet in a Megapolis: An Ecosystem Services Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Leamer, Edward E, 1973. "Multicollinearity: A Bayesian Interpretation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 55(3), pages 371-380, August.
    4. Joana Roque de Pinho & Clara Grilo & Randall B Boone & Kathleen A Galvin & Jeffrey G Snodgrass, 2014. "Influence of Aesthetic Appreciation of Wildlife Species on Attitudes towards Their Conservation in Kenyan Agropastoralist Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Sandifer, Paul A. & Sutton-Grier, Ariana E. & Ward, Bethney P., 2015. "Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2021. "The semiconducting principle of monetary and environmental values exchange," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 284-290.
    7. Po-Ching Wang & Chi-Ying Yu, 2018. "Aesthetic Experience as an Essential Factor to Trigger Positive Environmental Consciousness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Johan Colding & Matteo Giusti & Andreas Haga & Marita Wallhagen & Stephan Barthel, 2020. "Enabling Relationships with Nature in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Nanae Tanemura & Masako Kakizaki & Takashi Kusumi & Rie Onodera & Tsuyoshi Chiba, 2022. "Levels of trust in risk-only negative health messages issued by public agencies: a quantitative research-based mindsponge framework," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    10. Manish Kumar & Shobhit Srivastava & T. Muhammad & Priya Saravanakumar, 2022. "Examining the association between health status and subjective life expectancy among older Indian adults based on the mindsponge approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Vanessa Woods & Melinda Knuth, 2023. "The Biophilia Reactivity Hypothesis: biophilia as a temperament trait, or more precisely, a domain specific attraction to biodiversity," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 271-293, December.
    12. Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2018. "The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 5-5, January.
    13. Huie Li & Chang You & Jin Li & Mei Li & Min Tan & Guanfei Zhang & Yiping Zhong, 2022. "Influence of Environmental Aesthetic Value and Anticipated Emotion on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An ERP Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Tianyang Lou & Deyong Wang & Huili Chen & Dongjie Niu, 2020. "Different Perceptions of Belief: Predicting Household Solid Waste Separation Behavior of Urban and Rural Residents in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Minh-Phuong Thi Duong & Manh-Cuong Nguyen & Noah Mutai & Ruining Jin & Phuong-Tri Nguyen & Tam-Tri Le & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2023. "Promoting Stakeholders’ Support for Marine Protection Policies: Insights from a 42-Country Dataset," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2023. "Investigating urban residents' involvement in biodiversity conservation in protected areas: Empirical evidence from Vietnam," Thesis Commons z2hjv, Center for Open Science.
    3. Duong, Cong Thuy & Duong, Nguyen Cam & Dung, Nguyen Tan & Chuc, Hoang Thi Hong & Chi, Nguyen Hoang & Dung, Doan Thu & Chi, Vu Quynh & Chi, Hoang Thi Linh & , Le Thi Thanh Diem & Dương, Phan Thùy, 2022. "Climate Change And Energy Security," OSF Preprints 9sejb, Center for Open Science.
    4. Jin, Ruining, 2022. "Perceived losses urge people to pay for environmental conservation," OSF Preprints k5sfg, Center for Open Science.
    5. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Thomas E. Jones, 2022. "Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2021. "The power and difficulty of one-page articles," OSF Preprints xfc9d, Center for Open Science.
    7. Duong, Thi Minh Phuong & SARI, NI PUTU WULAN PURNAMA & Mazenda, Adrino & Le, Tam-Tri & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2023. "Improving the market for livestock production households to alleviate food insecurity in the Philippines," OSF Preprints mj5sp, Center for Open Science.
    8. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2023. "Kingfisher as a source of encouragement," OSF Preprints wjp5m, Center for Open Science.
    9. Quang-Loc, Nguyen & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong, 2023. "Academic writing and AI: Day-4 experiment with mindsponge theory," OSF Preprints awysc, Center for Open Science.
    10. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2020. "Evaluation of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: The international collaboration trilemma in interdisciplinary research," OSF Preprints 84j76, Center for Open Science.
    11. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2023. "Academic writing and AI: Day-2 experiment with cultural additivity," OSF Preprints 25yjw, Center for Open Science.
    12. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2023. "Academic writing and AI: Day-2 experiment with Bayesian Mindsponge Framework," OSF Preprints kr29c, Center for Open Science.
    13. Le, Tam-Tri & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2022. "Solo publications and the thoughts behind them," OSF Preprints mz4jq, Center for Open Science.
    14. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2023. "Academic writing and AI: Day-1 experiment," OSF Preprints xgqu5, Center for Open Science.
    15. Khuc, Quy Van, 2022. "Who plants trees, I plant trees," OSF Preprints pkr87, Center for Open Science.
    16. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tam-Tri Le & Quy Van Khuc & Quang-Loc Nguyen & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2022. "Escaping from Air Pollution: Exploring the Psychological Mechanism behind the Emergence of Internal Migration Intention among Urban Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Wai Soe Zin & Aya Suzuki & Kelvin S.-H. Peh & Alexandros Gasparatos, 2019. "Economic Value of Cultural Ecosystem Services from Recreation in Popa Mountain National Park, Myanmar: A Comparison of Two Rapid Valuation Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Masashi Soga & Kevin J. Gaston & Yuichi Yamaura & Kiyo Kurisu & Keisuke Hanaki, 2016. "Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Christopher Hassall & Michael Nisbet & Evan Norcliffe & He Wang, 2024. "The Potential Health Benefits of Urban Tree Planting Suggested through Immersive Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, February.
    20. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2007-059 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Deborah F Coldwell & Karl L Evans, 2017. "Contrasting effects of visiting urban green-space and the countryside on biodiversity knowledge and conservation support," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04036-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.