IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12802-d682985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Coalescent Synthesis Based on the Design for Environment (DfE) Principles: Brazilian Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Isadora Luiza Climaco Cunha

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 580, Block 18—Conjunto das Químicas, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil)

  • Fábio Rosa

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 580, Block 18—Conjunto das Químicas, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil)

  • Luiz Kulay

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 580, Block 18—Conjunto das Químicas, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Coalescents are compounds with a high potential for generating tropospheric ozone, which causes adverse effects on humans and their surroundings. This study designed a coalescent for decorative paints that reached technical levels equivalent to those obtained by StC, a product on the market, but with better environmental and economic performance. The strategy adopted in creating the green coalescent (GrC) improved film formation and reduced the product’s atmospheric emission rate. Regarding the environmental performance, GrC outperformed StC in terms of water consumption, global warming potential, and human toxicity by 30%, 35%, and 91%, but had a high smog formation potential even with a reduced loss to the air. The redesign of the molecule gave rise to AGrC, which achieved a more homogeneous environmental performance. The results of an economic analysis indicated that the procedures adopted to reduce environmental impacts could also make the coalescent more competitive if the lowest market prices were practiced. On the other hand, if the products are sold at high prices, the paint industry tends to privilege the economic dimension and disregard environmental performance for decision purposes. This research succeeded in reconciling technical functions and aspects related to sustainability to design more competitive products in the Brazilian market.

Suggested Citation

  • Isadora Luiza Climaco Cunha & Fábio Rosa & Luiz Kulay, 2021. "Green Coalescent Synthesis Based on the Design for Environment (DfE) Principles: Brazilian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12802-:d:682985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Rosa Trovato & Francesco Nocera & Salvatore Giuffrida, 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Antonio Dominguez-Delgado & Helena Domínguez-Torres & Carlos-Antonio Domínguez-Torres, 2020. "Energy and Economic Life Cycle Assessment of Cool Roofs Applied to the Refurbishment of Social Housing in Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-35, July.
    3. Jane C. Bare, 2002. "Traci: The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 6(3‐4), pages 49-78, July.
    4. Claudia Cristina Sanchez Moore & Luiz Kulay, 2019. "Effect of the Implementation of Carbon Capture Systems on the Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance of the Brazilian Electricity Matrix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Hugo Sakamoto & Flávia M. Ronquim & Marcelo Martins Seckler & Luiz Kulay, 2019. "Environmental Performance of Effluent Conditioning Systems for Reuse in Oil Refining Plants: A Case Study in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Irene C. Dedoussi & Sebastian D. Eastham & Erwan Monier & Steven R. H. Barrett, 2020. "Premature mortality related to United States cross-state air pollution," Nature, Nature, vol. 578(7794), pages 261-265, February.
    7. João Paulo Guerra & Fernando Henrique Cardoso & Alex Nogueira & Luiz Kulay, 2018. "Thermodynamic and Environmental Analysis of Scaling up Cogeneration Units Driven by Sugarcane Biomass to Enhance Power Exports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, January.
    8. João Clímaco & João Paulo Costa & Gregory Kersten, 2015. "Introduction," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 563-566, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natália de Almeida Menezes & Isadora Luiza Clímaco Cunha & Moisés Teles dos Santos & Luiz Kulay, 2022. "Obtaining bioLPG via the HVO Route in Brazil: A Prospect Study Based on Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Hugo Sakamoto & Larissa Thaís Bruschi & Luiz Kulay & Akebo Yamakami, 2023. "Using the Life Cycle Approach for Multiobjective Optimization in the Context of the Green Supply Chain: A Case Study of Brazilian Coffee," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Anna Życzyńska & Dariusz Majerek & Zbigniew Suchorab & Agnieszka Żelazna & Václav Kočí & Robert Černý, 2021. "Improving the Energy Performance of Public Buildings Equipped with Individual Gas Boilers Due to Thermal Retrofitting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Mustafa S. Al-Tekreeti & Salwa M. Beheiry & Vian Ahmed, 2022. "Commitment Indicators for Tracking Sustainable Design Decisions in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Yiwen Chiu & Yi Yang & Cody Morse, 2022. "Quantifying carbon footprint for ecological river restoration," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 952-970, January.
    6. Rui Liang & Xichuan Zheng & Po-Hsun Wang & Jia Liang & Linhui Hu, 2023. "Research Progress of Carbon-Neutral Design for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-50, August.
    7. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Dwivedi, Puneet & Bailis, Robert & Stainback, Andrew & Carter, Douglas R., 2012. "Impact of payments for carbon sequestered in wood products and avoided carbon emissions on the profitability of NIPF landowners in the US South," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 63-69.
    9. Linda Giresini & Claudia Casapulla & Pietro Croce, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Impact of Retrofitting Techniques to Prevent Out-of-Plane Failure Modes of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Baral, Anil & Bakshi, Bhavik R., 2010. "Emergy analysis using US economic input–output models with applications to life cycles of gasoline and corn ethanol," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(15), pages 1807-1818.
    11. Fabiana Frota de Albuquerque Landi & Claudia Fabiani & Anna Laura Pisello & Alessandro Petrozzi & Daniele Milone & Franco Cotana, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Claudia Cristina Sanchez Moore & Luiz Kulay, 2019. "Effect of the Implementation of Carbon Capture Systems on the Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance of the Brazilian Electricity Matrix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Vogel, Everton & Beber, Caetano Luiz, 2021. "Sustainable Intensification Strategies for GHG Mitigation Among Heterogeneous Dairy Farms in Paraná, Brazil," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315219, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Jacqueline Adelowo & Mathias Mier & Christoph Weissbart, 2021. "Taxation of Carbon Emissions and Air Pollution in Intertemporal Optimization Frameworks with Social and Private Discount Rates," ifo Working Paper Series 360, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    15. Rakhyun Kim & Myung-Kwan Lim & Seungjun Roh & Won-Jun Park, 2021. "Analysis of the Characteristics of Environmental Impacts According to the Cut-Off Criteria Applicable to the Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) of Apartment Buildings in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Mitavachan Hiremath & Peter Viebahn & Sascha Samadi, 2021. "An Integrated Comparative Assessment of Coal-Based Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Vis-à-Vis Renewable Energies in India’s Low Carbon Electricity Transition Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Jinhui Zhou & Laura Scherer & Peter M. van Bodegom & Arthur Beusen & José M. Mogollón, 2022. "Regionalized nitrogen fate in freshwater systems on a global scale," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 907-922, June.
    18. Aldona Standar & Agnieszka Kozera, 2020. "Identifying the Financial Risk Factors of Excessive Indebtedness of Rural Communes in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    19. Shakira R. Hobbs & Tyler M. Harris & William J. Barr & Amy E. Landis, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Bioplastics and Food Waste Disposal Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Jorge Muñoz & Francesco Piqué & Concepción A. Monje & Egidio Falotico, 2021. "Robust Fractional-Order Control Using a Decoupled Pitch and Roll Actuation Strategy for the I-Support Soft Robot," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12802-:d:682985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.