IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11686-d662459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Sectoral Digital Platform as a Tool for Innovation Ecosystem Development

Author

Listed:
  • Leyla Gamidullaeva

    (Department of Management and Economic Security, Penza State University, 440026 Penza, Russia
    Department of Applied and Business Informatics, K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (FCU), 109004 Moscow, Russia)

  • Tatyana Tolstykh

    (Department of Industrial Management, National University of Science & Technology (MISIS), 119049 Moscow, Russia
    Department of Industrial Economics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey Bystrov

    (Department of Industrial Economics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

  • Alexey Radaykin

    (Department of Industrial Economics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

  • Nadezhda Shmeleva

    (Department of Economics, National University of Science & Technology (MISIS), 119049 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

At present, issues of ecosystem self-organization and the mechanisms for their sustainable development have been insufficiently explored in academic literature. The key idea of our research is that for enterprises interacting in different industries based on a network partnership, a special tool is needed to ensure the openness of interaction between participants in the transfer of knowledge, technology, information, and resources. The authors argue that the development and practical implementation of a cross-sectoral digital ecosystem platform will allow for the synchronizing of the scientific and technological progress of several industries, making the most effective use of the synergistic effect from the interaction of ecosystem actors and ensuring the transparency and openness of the ongoing processes therein. The authors demonstrate their propositions with the example of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) industry. The proposed model and mechanism of cross-sectoral interaction can be replicated in different technological niches, such as robotics, neurotechnology, quantum technologies, etc. The conclusions arising from the conducted research provide scientists, government bodies, and decision-makers with the necessary information for a better understanding of practical mechanisms and tools that allow for the implementation of self-organization and sustainable development in modern innovation ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Leyla Gamidullaeva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Andrey Bystrov & Alexey Radaykin & Nadezhda Shmeleva, 2021. "Cross-Sectoral Digital Platform as a Tool for Innovation Ecosystem Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11686-:d:662459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11686/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11686/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias Carayannis & David Campbell, 2011. "Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge ," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(3), pages 327-372, September.
    2. Tatyana Tolstykh & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Nadezhda Shmeleva & Yuri Lapygin, 2020. "Regional Development in Russia: An Ecosystem Approach to Territorial Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Schmitt, Lars & Woelk, Sebastian & Schulz, Wolfgang H., 2018. "The Role of the Innovation Ecosystem for Regional Cluster Development: The Case of the Lake Constance Region," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2018), Split, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Split, Croatia, 6-8 September 2018, pages 434-443, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    4. Tatyana Tolstykh & Nadezhda Shmeleva & Leyla Gamidullaeva, 2020. "Evaluation of Circular and Integration Potentials of Innovation Ecosystems for Industrial Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Zoltán J. Ács & Erkko Autio & László Szerb, 2015. "National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 28, pages 523-541, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Fiona Sussan & Zoltan J. Acs, 2017. "The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 55-73, June.
    7. Granstrand, Ove & Holgersson, Marcus, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    8. Autio, Erkko & Kenney, Martin & Mustar, Philippe & Siegel, Don & Wright, Mike, 2014. "Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1097-1108.
    9. Rong, Ke & Li, Boyi & Peng, Wan & Zhou, Di & Shi, Xinwei, 2021. "Sharing economy platforms: creating shared value at a business ecosystem level," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. A. V. Trachuk & N. V. Linder, 2019. "Innovative Activity Of Industrial Enterprises: Measurement And Effectiveness Evaluation," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, vol. 10(2).
    11. T. O. Tolstykh & L. A. Gamidullayeva & E. V. Shkarupeta, 2018. "Key factors of development of the industrial enterprises in the conditions of the industry 4.0," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(1).
    12. Leyla A. Gamidullaeva & Saniyat Agamagomedova, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems: impact on the quality of life in a region," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 68-88.
    13. Rahul Kapoor, 2018. "Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunyu Zhang & Wenge Zeng, 2024. "Evaluating the Construction of a Digital Supervision Platform for Digital Trade Systems: a Multilateral Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12503-12534, September.
    2. Fedor Zagumennov, 2021. "In-Firm Planning and Business Processes Management Using Deep Neural Networks," GATR Journals jber213, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Kaur, Puneet & Ferraris, Alberto & Bresciani, Stefano & Dhir, Amandeep, 2024. "Connecting entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation. Grasping at straws or hitting a home run?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Tatyana Tolstykh & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Nadezhda Shmeleva, 2021. "Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    4. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    5. Silva, Lucas Emmanuel Nascimento & Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Faria, Aline Mariane de & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2024. "Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Daniel Sunghwan Cho & Paul Ryan & Giulio Buciuni, 2022. "Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1865-1883, April.
    7. Fellnhofer, Katharina, 2022. "Entrepreneurial alertness toward responsible research and innovation: Digital technology makes the psychological heart of entrepreneurship pound," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Bessagnet, Arnauld & Crespo, Joan & Vicente, Jérôme, 2021. "Unraveling the multi-scalar and evolutionary forces of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A historical event analysis applied to IoT Valley," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Jianhong Zhang & Désirée Gorp & Henk Kievit, 2023. "Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1077-1105, June.
    10. Quoc Hoang Thai & Khuong Ngoc Mai & Tung Thanh Do, 2023. "An Evolution of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Studies: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    11. Theodoraki, Christina & Dana, Léo-Paul & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 346-360.
    12. Abootorabi, Hooman & Wiklund, Johan & Johnson, Alan R. & Miller, Cameron D., 2021. "A holistic approach to the evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploratory study of academic spin-offs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    13. Pankov, Susanne & Schneckenberg, Dirk & Velamuri, Vivek K., 2021. "Advocating sustainability in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Micro-level practices of sharing ventures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    14. Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Raffaello Balocco, 2019. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1291-1321, December.
    15. Maksim Belitski & Rosa Caiazza & Erik E. Lehmann, 2021. "Knowledge frontiers and boundaries in entrepreneurship research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 521-531, February.
    16. Zhe Cao & Xianwei Shi, 2021. "A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 75-110, June.
    17. Han, Jin & Ruan, Yi & Wang, Yanmin & Zhou, Haibo, 2021. "Toward a complex adaptive system: The case of the Zhongguancun entrepreneurship ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 537-550.
    18. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    19. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    20. Ferreira, Joao J. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Veiga, Pedro Mota & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "The interactions of entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations in the (twin) environmental and digital transitions? A dynamic panel data approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11686-:d:662459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.