IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11613-d661210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Nora Weinberger

    (Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Silvia Woll

    (Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba

    (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Nona Schulte-Römer

    (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany)

Abstract

The participation of citizens in scientific research has a long tradition, and in some disciplines, especially medical research, it is even common practice. In Technology Assessment (TA), Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), and Sustainable Development (SD), the participation of citizens can be of considerable value. In this paper, we explore this value for three concepts, based on the researcher’s insights from three participatory research projects. The first project is the citizen science project TeQfor1, which was conducted with, for, and on the type 1 diabetes community, who do not feel adequately supported by the conventional health care system. In the second project, citizens with vision impairments participated in the technological development of an audio-tactile navigation tool in the TERRAIN project. The third project (Nachtlichter) dealt with light pollution. Based on the three projects presented, we show that citizen participation makes specific contributions to TA, RRI, and SD. We also investigate the specificity of citizen engagement and motivation by differentiating between existing and emerging involvement. In conclusion, we discuss the benefits that may be added by participatory approaches for the three concepts of TA, RRI, and SD.

Suggested Citation

  • Nora Weinberger & Silvia Woll & Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba & Nona Schulte-Römer, 2021. "The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11613-:d:661210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11613/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11613/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nona Schulte-Römer & Josiane Meier & Etta Dannemann & Max Söding, 2019. "Lighting Professionals versus Light Pollution Experts? Investigating Views on an Emerging Environmental Concern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Nora Weinberger & Markus Winkelmann & Karin Müller & Sebastian Ritterbusch & Rainer Stiefelhagen, 2019. "Public Participation in the Development Process of a Mobility Assistance System for Visually Impaired Pedestrians," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Jeremy Auerbach & Erika L. Barthelmess & Darlene Cavalier & Caren B. Cooper & Heather Fenyk & Mordechai Haklay & Joseph M. Hulbert & Christopher C. M. Kyba & Lincoln R. Larson & Eva Lewandowski & Lea , 2019. "The problem with delineating narrow criteria for citizen science," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(31), pages 15336-15337, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nona Schulte-Römer & Josiane Meier & Max Söding & Etta Dannemann, 2019. "The LED Paradox: How Light Pollution Challenges Experts to Reconsider Sustainable Lighting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Alexandra Albert, 2021. "Citizen social science in practice: the case of the Empty Houses Project," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Andreas Papalambrou & Lambros T. Doulos, 2019. "Identifying, Examining, and Planning Areas Protected from Light Pollution. The Case Study of Planning the First National Dark Sky Park in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Jens Schirmel, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Turns Life-Science Students into “Citizen Scientists”: Data Indicate Multiple Negative Effects of Urbanization on Biota," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Theodor Terrich & Marek Balsky, 2022. "The Effect of Spill Light on Street Lighting Energy Efficiency and Light Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    6. Lambros T. Doulos & Ioannis Sioutis & Aris Tsangrassoulis & Laurent Canale & Kostantinos Faidas, 2020. "Revision of Threshold Luminance Levels in Tunnels Aiming to Minimize Energy Consumption at No Cost: Methodology and Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Krzysztof Skarżyński & Anna Rutkowska, 2023. "The Interplay between Parameters of Light Pollution and Energy Efficiency for Outdoor Amenity Lighting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Radoslava Kanianska & Jana Škvareninová & Stanislav Kaniansky, 2020. "Landscape Potential and Light Pollution as Key Factors for Astrotourism Development: A Case Study of a Slovak Upland Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Krzysztof Skarżyński & Wojciech Żagan, 2022. "Quantitative Assessment of Architectural Lighting Designs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Nadja Pernat & Jana Zscheischler & Helge Kampen & Emu-Felicitas Ostermann-Miyashita & Jonathan M Jeschke & Doreen Werner, 2022. "How media presence triggers participation in citizen science—The case of the mosquito monitoring project ‘Mückenatlas‘," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Przemyslaw Tabaka, 2021. "Influence of Replacement of Sodium Lamps in Park Luminaires with LED Sources of Different Closest Color Temperature on the Effect of Light Pollution and Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, October.
    12. Klaasz Breukel & Ellen Cieraad, 2024. "Using Light as a Medium to Convey Its Dark Side—A Light Festival Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-11, August.
    13. Catherine Pérez Vega & Karolina M. Zielinska-Dabkowska & Franz Hölker, 2021. "Urban Lighting Research Transdisciplinary Framework—A Collaborative Process with Lighting Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Linda Nierling & Maria Maia, 2020. "Assistive Technologies: Social Barriers and Socio-Technical Pathways," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11613-:d:661210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.