IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11533-d659580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resident Perceptions of Mosquito Problems Are More Influenced by Landscape Factors than Mosquito Abundance

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey A. Brown

    (Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Kelli L. Larson

    (School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
    School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Susannah B. Lerman

    (United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Amherst, MA 01003, USA)

  • Alexandreana Cocroft

    (School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Sharon J. Hall

    (School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

Abstract

Mosquitoes and the pathogens they carry are increasingly common in urban areas throughout the globe. With urban landscapes, the need to manage mosquitoes is driven by the health risks and nuisance complaints associated with mosquitoes. Controlling the number of mosquitoes may reduce the overall risk of disease transmission but may not reduce nuisance complaints. This study focuses on Maricopa County in Arizona, USA, to investigate the relationship between mosquito abundance and landscape-level and sociodemographic factors on resident perceptions of mosquitoes. We used boosted regression trees to compare how mosquito abundance, collected from Maricopa Vector Control, and landscape factors and social factors, assessed through the Phoenix Area Social Survey, influence survey respondents’ reporting of mosquitoes as a problem. Results show that the landscape and sociodemographic features play a prominent role in how individuals perceive mosquitoes as a problem; specifically, respondents’ perception of their local landscape as messy and the distance to landscape features such as wetlands have more substantial roles in shaping perceptions. This work can highlight how potential mosquito and non-mosquito-related communications and management efforts may improve residents’ satisfaction with mosquito control or other wildlife management efforts, which can help inform best practices for vector control agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey A. Brown & Kelli L. Larson & Susannah B. Lerman & Alexandreana Cocroft & Sharon J. Hall, 2021. "Resident Perceptions of Mosquito Problems Are More Influenced by Landscape Factors than Mosquito Abundance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11533-:d:659580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11533/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11533/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dike, Nkem & Onwujekwe, Obinna & Ojukwu, Juliana & Ikeme, Arthur & Uzochukwu, Benjamin & Shu, Elvis, 2006. "Influence of education and knowledge on perceptions and practices to control malaria in Southeast Nigeria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 103-106, July.
    2. Kane, Kevin & York, Abigail M., 2017. "Prices, policies, and place: What drives greenfield development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 415-428.
    3. Josselin Thuilliez & Claire Bellia & Jean-Sébastien Dehecq & Olivier Reilhes, 2014. "Household-Level Expenditure on Protective Measures Against Mosquitoes on the Island of La Réunion, France," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. V. Kerry Smith & Kelli L. Larson & Abigail York, 2020. "Using quality signaling to enhance survey response rates," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 951-954, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimo Canali & Stefano Rivas-Morales & Philippe Beutels & Claudio Venturelli, 2017. "The Cost of Arbovirus Disease Prevention in Europe: Area-Wide Integrated Control of Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus , in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Ngowu, Rufus & Larson, James S. & Kim, Min Su, 2008. "Reducing child mortality in Nigeria: A case study of immunization and systemic factors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 161-164, July.
    3. Bbaale, Edward & Okumu, Ibrahim Mike, 2016. "Socio-Economic Status and Malaria Prevalence among Infants: the Case of Uganda," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 4(1), January.
    4. Xinyi Wang & F. Atiyya Shaw & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Kari E. Watkins, 2023. "Response willingness in consecutive travel surveys: an investigation based on the National Household Travel Survey using a sample selection model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2339-2373, December.
    5. Kee, Jennifer & Segovia, Michelle S. & Saboury, Piruz & Palma, Marco A., 2022. "Appealing to generosity to reduce food calorie intake: A natural field experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Pierce, Hayley & Foster, Kathryn, 2020. "Health and well-being outcomes of women and children in Sub-Saharan Africa: Examining the role of formal schooling, literacy, and health knowledge," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Stratton, Leeanne & O'Neill, Marie S. & Kruk, Margaret E. & Bell, Michelle L., 2008. "The persistent problem of malaria: Addressing the fundamental causes of a global killer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 854-862, September.
    8. Masuda, Kazuya, 2019. "Length of maternal schooling and child’s risk of malaria infection in Uganda: evidence from a natural experiment," CEI Working Paper Series 2018-22, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    9. Beniamino Caputo & Mattia Manica & Gianluca Russo & Angelo Solimini, 2020. "Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards the Tiger Mosquito Aedes Albopictus. A Questionnaire Based Survey in Lazio Region (Italy) before the 2017 Chikungunya Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Florence Lamaurt & Olga De Santis & Julie Ramis & Cédric Schultz & Ana Rivadeneyra & Mathias Waelli & Antoine Flahault, 2022. "Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices Regarding Dengue in La Réunion Island, France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11533-:d:659580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.