IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9894-d628088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Pledges More Powerful: Effects on Pro-Environmental Beliefs and Conservation Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Tyler P. Jacobs

    (Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

  • Lauren L. Gottschalk

    (Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

  • Mitchell Dandignac

    (Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

  • Allen R. McConnell

    (Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

Abstract

We developed pledges that capitalized on several self-related properties (e.g., freedom of choice, actual-ought self-discrepancies, foot-in-door technique) and manipulated two experimental factors: pledge beneficiary and pledge audience. In two studies, participants received a recycling pledge based on a random assignment in a 2 (Beneficiaries: Nature vs. Self) × 2 (Audience: Ingroup vs. Outgroup) design. Afterwards, we assessed their pro-environmental beliefs and provided them with a behavioral opportunity to support conservation (i.e., recycling debriefing forms in Study 1, writing letters to congresspeople regarding an environmental policy in Study 2). In both studies, an interaction between beneficiaries and audience was observed, showing that a recycling pledge framed as benefitting nature and sponsored by a social ingroup led to more progressive environmental beliefs. In Study 2, individuals in the same condition (i.e., the nature-ingroup pledge) wrote more persuasive letters (longer and more sophisticated letters) supporting pro-environmental legislation. Implications for constructing effective pledges and for leveraging the self to promote pro-environmental action are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tyler P. Jacobs & Lauren L. Gottschalk & Mitchell Dandignac & Allen R. McConnell, 2021. "Making Pledges More Powerful: Effects on Pro-Environmental Beliefs and Conservation Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9894-:d:628088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9894/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9894/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaohuan Xie & Yi Lu & Zhonghua Gou, 2017. "Green Building Pro-Environment Behaviors: Are Green Users Also Green Buyers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaolun Wang & Xinlin Yao, 2020. "Fueling Pro-Environmental Behaviors with Gamification Design: Identifying Key Elements in Ant Forest with the Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Qian-Cheng Wang & Yi-Xuan Wang & Izzy Yi Jian & Hsi-Hsien Wei & Xuan Liu & Yao-Tian Ma, 2020. "Exploring the “Energy-Saving Personality Traits” in the Office and Household Situation: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Li Zhang & Yue Fan & Xiaochun Yang & Jiahao Zhang, 2021. "Promoting Green Real Estate Development by Increasing Residents’ Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Xiaoyue Zhu & Bo Gao & Xudong Yang & Yanping Yuan & Ji Ni, 2021. "Interactions between the Built Environment and the Energy-Related Behaviors of Occupants in Government Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Zhenmin Yuan & Jianliang Zhou & Yaning Qiao & Yadi Zhang & Dandan Liu & Hui Zhu, 2020. "BIM-VE-Based Optimization of Green Building Envelope from the Perspective of both Energy Saving and Life Cycle Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Prescott C. Ensign & Shawn Roy & Tom Brzustowski, 2021. "Decisions by Key Office Building Stakeholders to Build or Retrofit Green in Toronto’s Urban Core," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    7. Xiaohuan Xie & Shiyu Qin & Zhonghua Gou & Ming Yi, 2020. "Can Green Building Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviours? The Psychological Model and Design Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Pleasa Serin Abraham & Haripriya Gundimeda, 2020. "Greening offices: Willingness to pay for green-certified office spaces in Bengaluru, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1839-1857, March.
    9. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Houses Based on Wood as an Ecological and Sustainable Housing Alternative—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Chaniporn Thampanichwat & Chumporn Moorapun & Suphat Bunyarittikit & Phattranis Suphavarophas & Prima Phaibulputhipong, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of Architecture Fostering Green Mindfulness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Maria Antoniadou & Georgios Chrysochoou & Rafael Tzanetopoulos & Elena Riza, 2023. "Green Dental Environmentalism among Students and Dentists in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Shiwen Zhao & Liwen Chen, 2021. "Exploring Residents’ Purchase Intention of Green Housings in China: An Extended Perspective of Perceived Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Khan, Rana Asad Javid & Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin & Ali, Tauha Hussain, 2020. "Are Pakistani homebuyers ready to adopt sustainable housing? An insight into their willingness to pay," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Perception of User Criteria in the Context of Sustainability of Modern Methods of Construction Based on Wood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Constantin Kempf & Juerg Syz, 2022. "Why pay for sustainable housing? Decomposing the green premium of the residential property market in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-39, November.
    16. Xiaodong Yang & Jiayu Zhang & Xianbo Zhao, 2018. "Factors Affecting Green Residential Building Development: Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Inês Teotónio & Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Cristina Matos Silva & José Morais, 2020. "Investing in Sustainable Built Environments: The Willingness to Pay for Green Roofs and Green Walls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Li, Qianwen & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2018. "Differences and influencing factors for Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housings: Evidence from five first-tier cities in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 299-313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9894-:d:628088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.