IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9344-d618057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Assessment of Para Rubber ( Hevea brasiliensis ) above Ground Biomass Potentials in Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • John Nyandansobi Simon

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Narissara Nuthammachot

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Teerawet Titseesang

    (Faculty of Business Administration, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

  • Kingsley Ezechukwu Okpara

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Kuaanan Techato

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
    Environmental Assessment and Technology for Hazardous Waste Management Research Center, Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkhla University, Hat Yai, Songkla 90110, Thailand)

Abstract

Currently, Songkhla Province of Thailand has been recognized as a convenient hub of rubber industry development, accompanied by an attendant abundance of rubber tree plantations. A spatialized assessment of the rubber tree was carried out to estimate its aboveground biomass potentials using remote sensing techniques and ecosystem modeling procedures. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer satellite-based estimations of the net primary productivity were derived and complemented with a calculated generic model, to quantify the respective above ground biomass potentials para rubber. Above ground biomass assessment findings revealed a mean value of 82.1 tonnes C ha −1 and an aggregate of 31. 9 million tonnes C ha −1 which is the theoretical potential, this is segregated into energy usable, and other economic purpose biomass potentials, with corresponding value ranges of 1624.1 to 6,041,531.2 million tonnes C ha −1 and 85.5 to 317,975.6 thousand tonnes C ha −1 respectively. Besides the theoretical above ground biomass potential (entire biomass accumulation ratio) commonly evaluated, the other potentials, which include naturally obtainable biomass usable for energy generation and the remaining share of the feedstock for non-energy uses, have been brought to light. Songkhla province has the potential for good carbon sink and sustainable supply of different pools of feedstock from the rubber tree that reinforces each other in providing a comprehensive view of biomass in energy and non-energy opportunities. The socioeconomic production and value chain analysis of the identified biomass pools needs to be evaluated; this will consequently guide policy toward a comprehensive rubber sector sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • John Nyandansobi Simon & Narissara Nuthammachot & Teerawet Titseesang & Kingsley Ezechukwu Okpara & Kuaanan Techato, 2021. "Spatial Assessment of Para Rubber ( Hevea brasiliensis ) above Ground Biomass Potentials in Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9344-:d:618057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali, Shahid & Taweekun, Juntakan & Techato, Kuaanan & Waewsak, Jompob & Gyawali, Saroj, 2019. "GIS based site suitability assessment for wind and solar farms in Songkhla, Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1360-1372.
    2. Amit Sarkar, 2018. "Accuracy Assessment and Analysis of Land Use Land Cover Change Using Geoinformatics Technique in Raniganj Coalfield Area, India," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 25-34, May.
    3. Christopher Potter & Steven Klooster & Vanessa Genovese, 2012. "Net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems from 2000 to 2009," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 365-378, November.
    4. Jamroon Srichaichana & Yongyut Trisurat & Suwit Ongsomwang, 2019. "Land Use and Land Cover Scenarios for Optimum Water Yield and Sediment Retention Ecosystem Services in Klong U-Tapao Watershed, Songkhla, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qifei Zhang & Congjian Sun & Yaning Chen & Wei Chen & Yanyun Xiang & Jiao Li & Yuting Liu, 2022. "Recent Oasis Dynamics and Ecological Security in the Tarim River Basin, Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of terrain slope on the performance of single-axis trackers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    3. Shuting Bai & Jiuchun Yang & Yubo Zhang & Fengqin Yan & Lingxue Yu & Shuwen Zhang, 2022. "Evaluating Ecosystem Services and Trade-Offs Based on Land-Use Simulation: A Case Study in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Sward, Jeffrey A. & Nilson, Roberta S. & Katkar, Venktesh V. & Stedman, Richard C. & Kay, David L. & Ifft, Jennifer E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Shulin Chen & Li Yang & Xiaotong Liu & Zhenghao Zhu, 2022. "Net Primary Productivity Variations Associated with Climate Change and Human Activities in Nanjing Metropolitan Area of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Besharati Fard, Moein & Moradian, Parisa & Emarati, Mohammadreza & Ebadi, Mehdi & Gholamzadeh Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad & Klemeŝ, Jiří Jaromír, 2022. "Ground-mounted photovoltaic power station site selection and economic analysis based on a hybrid fuzzy best-worst method and geographic information system: A case study Guilan province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Karen T. Lourdes & Chris N. Gibbins & Perrine Hamel & Ruzana Sanusi & Badrul Azhar & Alex M. Lechner, 2021. "A Review of Urban Ecosystem Services Research in Southeast Asia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Styliani Karamountzou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Suitability and Sustainability Assessment of Existing Onshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Javier Domínguez & Carlo Bellini & Ana María Martín & Luis F. Zarzalejo, 2024. "Optimizing Solar Potential Analysis in Cuba: A Methodology for High-Resolution Regional Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    11. Xiangwei Zhao & Qian Gao & Yaojie Yue & Lian Duan & Shun Pan, 2018. "A System Analysis on Steppe Sustainability and Its Driving Forces—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Wei Shi & Fuwei Qiao & Liang Zhou, 2021. "Identification of Ecological Risk Zoning on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from the Perspective of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Ismail Kamdar & Shahid Ali & Juntakan Taweekun & Hafiz Muhammad Ali, 2021. "Wind Farm Site Selection Using WAsP Tool for Application in the Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Paweł Kut & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods in Environmental and Energy Engineering Using CiteSpace Software: Identification of Key Research Trends and Patterns of Internati," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Yuanming Xie & Zemeng Ma & Mingjie Fang & Weiguo Liu & Feiyan Yu & Jiajing Tian & Shuoxin Zhang & Yan Yan, 2023. "Analysis of Net Primary Productivity of Retired Farmlands in the Grain-for-Green Project in China from 2011 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Gao, Jing & Wang, Chao & Wang, Zhanwu & Lin, Jin & Zhang, Runkai & Wu, Xin & Xu, Guangyin & Wang, Zhenfeng, 2024. "Site selection decision for biomass cogeneration projects from a sustainable perspective: A case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    18. Rodigheri, Grazieli & Fontana, Denise Cybis & da Luz, Luana Becker & Dalmago, Genei Antonio & Schirmbeck, Lucimara Wolfarth & Schirmbeck, Juliano & de Gouvêa, Jorge Alberto & da Cunha, Gilberto Rocca, 2024. "TVDI-based water stress coefficient to estimate net primary productivity in soybean areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    19. Dehghan, Hassan & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Shahsavari, Ardavan, 2022. "Multicriteria decision and Geographic Information System-based locational analysis and techno-economic assessment of a hybrid energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 189-199.
    20. Sofia Spyridonidou & Georgia Sismani & Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Hagit Ulanovsky & Daniel Madar, 2021. "Sustainable Spatial Energy Planning of Large-Scale Wind and PV Farms in Israel: A Collaborative and Participatory Planning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9344-:d:618057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.