IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8478-d604136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of a Plant-Based, Regionally Marketed Shampoo and Analysis of Refill Options

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Kröhnert

    (Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Life Sciences and Facility Management, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland)

  • Matthias Stucki

    (Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Life Sciences and Facility Management, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland)

Abstract

The environmental impact of a plant-based shampoo produced and marketed in Zurich, Switzerland, was analyzed using the life cycle assessment method. Beside the identification of environmental hotspots and mitigation possibilities, the focus of the study was on the analysis and comparison of different refill offers. The results of the study show that one hair wash using the investigated shampoo is related to greenhouse gas emissions of 161 g CO 2 eq. For all investigated impact categories, the use phase represents the dominant life stage, except for land use, which is dominated by the production of the purely plant-based shampoo ingredients. The environmental impact related to the use phase is highly sensitive on the consumers’ showering habits, such as water consumption and water temperature, due to predominantly fossil-based heating in Zurich. On the producer’s side, a switch to renewable energy sources both for heating and electricity is identified as most effective measure to reduce the environmental impact of the manufacturing phase. As to the product end-of-life, the results suggest that emissions of the shampoo ingredients after wastewater treatment have a negligible impact on freshwater ecotoxicity. In this context, a need for further research is identified with respect to characterization factors and specific removal rates in wastewater treatment plants. From a life cycle perspective, packaging production and disposal have rather low contributions. Offering refill possibilities can reduce the packaging related contributions by several percentage points, however, higher mitigation potentials are found for use phase and manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Kröhnert & Matthias Stucki, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Plant-Based, Regionally Marketed Shampoo and Analysis of Refill Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8478-:d:604136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wrzaszcz, Wioletta & Prandecki, Konrad, 2020. "Agriculture and The European Green Deal," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311273, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    2. Deborah Scharfy & Norman Boccali & Matthias Stucki, 2017. "Clean Technologies in Agriculture—How to Prioritise Measures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hornungová, Jana & Petrová, Kateřina, 2023. "The Relationship Between Digital Performance and Production of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in EU Countries: Correlation Analysis and ANOVA Method," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(1), January.
    2. Elena Feo & Sylvia Burssens & Hannes Mareen & Pieter Spanoghe, 2022. "Shedding Light into the Need of Knowledge Sharing in H2020 Thematic Networks for the Agriculture and Forestry Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Małgorzata Holka & Jolanta Kowalska & Magdalena Jakubowska, 2022. "Reducing Carbon Footprint of Agriculture—Can Organic Farming Help to Mitigate Climate Change?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Carlos Bautista-Capetillo & Hugo Márquez-Villagrana & Anuard Pacheco-Guerrero & Julián González-Trinidad & Hugo Júnez-Ferreira & Manuel Zavala-Trejo, 2018. "Cropping System Diversification: Water Consumption against Crop Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Jagoda Zmyślona & Arkadiusz Sadowski & Natalia Genstwa, 2023. "Plant Protection and Fertilizer Use Efficiency in Farms in a Context of Overinvestment: A Case Study from Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Prandecki, Konrad, 2021. "The impact of climate change on the development of agriculture and rural areas in the perspective of 2030," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 189(4), February.
    7. Emmanouil Tziolas & Eleftherios Karapatzak & Ioannis Kalathas & Aikaterini Karampatea & Antonios Grigoropoulos & Aadil Bajoub & Theodore Pachidis & Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, 2023. "Assessing the Economic Performance of Multipurpose Collaborative Robots toward Skillful and Sustainable Viticultural Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Błażej Suproń & Janusz Myszczyszyn, 2024. "Impact of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption on the Production of the Agricultural Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Sarah Wettstein & Karen Muir & Deborah Scharfy & Matthias Stucki, 2017. "The Environmental Mitigation Potential of Photovoltaic-Powered Irrigation in the Production of South African Maize," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Jarosław Brożek & Anna Kożuch & Marek Wieruszewski & Roman Jaszczak & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2024. "Taxonomy Regulation as a New Instrument for the Sustainable Management of the Forest Environment in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2022. "Green Deal, Green Growth and Green Economy as a Means of Support for Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-32, May.
    12. Xiongtian Shi & Yan Liu & Zhengyong Yu, 2024. "Unveiling the Catalytic Role of Digital Trade in China’s Carbon Emission Reduction under the Dual Carbon Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8478-:d:604136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.