IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7624-d590455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating Historical Earthquakes in Existing Cities for Fostering Design of Resilient and Sustainable Communities: The Ljubljana Case

Author

Listed:
  • Anže Babič

    (Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Matjaž Dolšek

    (Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Jure Žižmond

    (Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

The seismic exposure of urban areas today is much higher than centuries ago. The 2020 Zagreb earthquake demonstrated that European cities are vulnerable even to moderate earthquakes, a fact that has been known to earthquake-engineering experts for decades. However, alerting decision-makers to the seismic risk issue is very challenging, even when they are aware of historical earthquakes that caused natural catastrophes in the areas of their jurisdiction. To help solve the issue, we introduce a scenario-based risk assessment methodology and demonstrate the consequences of the 1895 Ljubljana earthquake on the existing building stock. We show that a 6.2 magnitude earthquake with an epicentre 5 km north of Ljubljana would cause many deaths and severe damage to the building stock, which would likely lead to direct economic losses higher than 15% of the GDP of the Republic of Slovenia. Such an event would be catastrophic not only for the community directly affected by the earthquake but for the entire country. We have disseminated this information over the course of a year together in addition to formulating a plan for enhancing the community seismic resilience in Slovenia. Hopefully, local decision-makers will act according to their jurisdiction in Slovenia and persuade decision-makers across Europe to update the built environment renovation policy at the European level.

Suggested Citation

  • Anže Babič & Matjaž Dolšek & Jure Žižmond, 2021. "Simulating Historical Earthquakes in Existing Cities for Fostering Design of Resilient and Sustainable Communities: The Ljubljana Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7624-:d:590455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saeideh Farahani & Ahmad Tahershamsi & Behrouz Behnam, 2020. "Earthquake and post-earthquake vulnerability assessment of urban gas pipelines network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(2), pages 327-347, March.
    2. William H. Starbuck, 2009. "Perspective ---Cognitive Reactions to Rare Events: Perceptions, Uncertainty, and Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 925-937, October.
    3. Daniel Felsenstein & Eilat Elbaum & Tsafrir Levi & Ran Calvo, 2021. "Post-processing HAZUS earthquake damage and loss assessments for individual buildings," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 21-45, January.
    4. Pitilakis, Kyriazis & Argyroudis, Sotiris & Fotopoulou, Stavroula & Karafagka, Stella & Kakderi, Kalliopi & Selva, Jacopo, 2019. "Application of stress test concepts for port infrastructures against natural hazards. The case of Thessaloniki port in Greece," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 240-257.
    5. Vitor Silva & Helen Crowley & Marco Pagani & Damiano Monelli & Rui Pinho, 2014. "Development of the OpenQuake engine, the Global Earthquake Model’s open-source software for seismic risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 72(3), pages 1409-1427, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sotirios A. Argyroudis & Stavroula Fotopoulou & Stella Karafagka & Kyriazis Pitilakis & Jacopo Selva & Ernesto Salzano & Anna Basco & Helen Crowley & Daniela Rodrigues & José P. Matos & Anton J. Schle, 2020. "A risk-based multi-level stress test methodology: application to six critical non-nuclear infrastructures in Europe," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(2), pages 595-633, January.
    2. Nay Chi Khin Khin Oo & Sirisuhk Rakthin, 2022. "Integrative Review of Absorptive Capacity’s Role in Fostering Organizational Resilience and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    4. Kristina Vaarst Andersen & Karin Beukel & Beverly B. Tyler, 2021. "Learning to Litigate: the Relationship Between Past Litigation Experience and Litigation Outcomes in the Chinese Intellectual Property System," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 479-500, December.
    5. Mesa, William B., 2019. "Accounting students’ learning processes in analytics: A sensemaking perspective," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 50-68.
    6. Fabrice L. Cavarretta & Sean T Hannah & Ronald F Piccolo & Mary Uhl-Bien, 2015. "Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses," Working Papers hal-01214027, HAL.
    7. Aurélien Acquier & Cedric Dalmasso, 2013. "Combining Strategic Agility and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: the need for Resource Sensitivity," Post-Print hal-01487685, HAL.
    8. Afiqah Ismail & Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid & Talal Amhadi & Ramli Nazir & Masyhur Irsyam & Lutfi Faizal, 2024. "Exploring the Evolution of Seismic Hazard and Risk Assessment Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    9. André Luis Silva & Márcia de Freitas Duarte & Flávia Plutarco, 2020. "Organizational Rare Events: Theory and Research Practice," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 635-659, October.
    10. Qi Tong & Thomas Gernay, 2022. "A hierarchical Bayesian model for predicting fire ignitions after an earthquake with application to California," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1637-1660, March.
    11. Yung, Kenneth & Cai, Qiuye & Li, Deqing Diane, 2023. "Greasing the wheels of irreversible investment: International evidence on the economic effects of corruption," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Dui, Hongyan & Zheng, Xiaoqian & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Paul C. Nystrom & Ehsan S. Soofi, 2012. "Rare, outlier and extreme: beyond the Gaussian model and measures," International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 6-38.
    14. Nick Oliver & Thomas Calvard & Kristina Potočnik, 2017. "Cognition, Technology, and Organizational Limits: Lessons from the Air France 447 Disaster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 729-743, August.
    15. Jennifer Howard-Grenville & Karen Golden-Biddle & Jennifer Irwin & Jina Mao, 2011. "Liminality as Cultural Process for Cultural Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 522-539, April.
    16. Joseph Lampel & Jamal Shamsie & Zur Shapira, 2009. "Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 835-845, October.
    17. Zheng He & Negar Elhami Khorasani, 2022. "Identification and hierarchical structure of cause factors for fire following earthquake using data mining and interpretive structural modeling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(1), pages 947-976, May.
    18. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy & Jonathan Bundy & Donald C. Hambrick, 2020. "Effects of an Advancing Tenure on CEO Cognitive Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 936-959, July.
    19. David C. Hall & Tracy D. Johnson-Hall, 2017. "Learning from Conformance Quality Failures That Triggered Product Recalls: The Role of Direct and Indirect Experience," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(4), pages 13-36, October.
    20. Jong-Hwa Park & Myoungsu Shin & Gi-Hyoug Cho, 2016. "A dynamic estimation of casualties from an earthquake based on a time-use survey: applying HAZUS-MH software to Ulsan, Korea," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 289-306, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7624-:d:590455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.