IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7278-d584963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Stakeholder Pressure Matters in Adopting Sustainable Supply Chain Initiatives? Insights from Agro-Based Processing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Tamoor Azam

    (Department of Management Sciences and Engineering, School of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Yunnan 650500, China)

  • Songjiang Wang

    (Department of Management Sciences and Engineering, School of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Yunnan 650500, China)

  • Muhammad Mohsin

    (School of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Loudi 417000, China)

  • Muhammad Nazam

    (Institute of Business Management Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Hashim

    (Faisalabad Business School, National Textile University, Faisalabad 37610, Pakistan)

  • Sajjad Ahmad Baig

    (Faisalabad Business School, National Textile University, Faisalabad 37610, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman

    (Faisalabad Business School, National Textile University, Faisalabad 37610, Pakistan)

Abstract

Over the past few years, sustainable supply chain initiatives (SSCIs) have grabbed attention in the domestic, as well as global, marketplace of the food sector. Nowadays, the success of the entire food supply chain depends on the prosperity of farms, local communities, trader processors, and agro-based industries. Despite its importance, food processing industries (FPIs) are encountering various hurdles in achieving sustainable business goals due to the sheer number of potential barriers. Due to this reason, stakeholders are continuously pressuring the management of FPIs to embrace sustainable food processing activities. In light of this, the present study aims to apply a hybrid fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (F-AHP) framework, based on fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (F-TOPSIS), for analyzing the barriers and prioritizing the possible pathways in adopting the SSCIs for the development of FPIs. Based on the extensive review of literature and panel consultation with experienced experts, a total of seven main barriers, forty-two sub barriers, and five possible pathways as strategic tools were finalized and ranked. An empirical case investigation of a Pakistani-based food processing company has been taken to check the practical application of the proposed framework along with sensitivity analysis. The findings of this study reveal that the lack of sustainable outsourcing factors were found as the top-ranked barrier in implementing SSCIs, and the possible pathway to overcome this barrier is the appropriate management of the procurement cycle. The major contribution of this study is to establish a barriers prioritization framework and suggest possible pathways to overcome these barriers for the successful implementation of SSCIs. Finally, the theoretical, managerial, and policy implications are provided as a way forward for the concerned stakeholders and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamoor Azam & Songjiang Wang & Muhammad Mohsin & Muhammad Nazam & Muhammad Hashim & Sajjad Ahmad Baig & Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, 2021. "Does Stakeholder Pressure Matters in Adopting Sustainable Supply Chain Initiatives? Insights from Agro-Based Processing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7278-:d:584963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Ageron & A. Gunasekaran & A. Spalanzani, 2012. "Sustainable supply management : an empirical study," Post-Print halshs-00740499, HAL.
    2. Cecere, Grazia & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2017. "Green jobs and eco-innovations in European SMEs," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 86-98.
    3. Chen, Chen-Tung & Lin, Ching-Torng & Huang, Sue-Fn, 2006. "A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 289-301, August.
    4. Govindan, Kannan, 2018. "Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 419-431.
    5. Muhammad Junaid & Ye Xue & Muzzammil Wasim Syed & Ji Zu Li & Muhammad Ziaullah, 2019. "A Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Longoni, Annachiara & Golini, Ruggero & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2014. "The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 147-160.
    7. Muhammad Asad ur Rehman Naseer & Muhammad Ashfaq & Sarfraz Hassan & Azhar Abbas & Amar Razzaq & Mubashir Mehdi & Anoma Ariyawardana & Mumtaz Anwar, 2019. "Critical Issues at the Upstream Level in Sustainable Supply Chain Management of Agri-Food Industries: Evidence from Pakistan’s Citrus Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Joseph Sarkis & Marilyn Michelle Helms & Aref A. Hervani, 2010. "Reverse logistics and social sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 337-354, November.
    9. Gunasekaran, A. & Ngai, E. W. T., 2004. "Information systems in supply chain integration and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 269-295, December.
    10. Sachin K. Patil & Ravi Kant, 2014. "Ranking the barriers of knowledge management adoption in supply chain using fuzzy AHP method," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 52-75.
    11. Ageron, Blandine & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Spalanzani, Alain, 2012. "Sustainable supply management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 168-182.
    12. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2008. "Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 261-273, February.
    13. Andrea Revell & Robert Rutherfoord, 2003. "UK environmental policy and the small firm: broadening the focus," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 26-35, January.
    14. Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2014. "Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 460-471.
    15. Ferretti, I. & Zanoni, S. & Zavanella, L. & Diana, A., 2007. "Greening the aluminium supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 236-245, July.
    16. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    17. De, Arijit & Choudhary, Alok & Turkay, Metin & Tiwari, Manoj K., 2021. "Bunkering policies for a fuel bunker management problem for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 927-939.
    18. Mau, Markus, 2002. "Supply Chain Management in Agriculture - Including Economics Aspects like Responsibility and Transparency," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24806, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Mohit Goswami & Arijit De & Muhammad Khoirul Khakim Habibi & Yash Daultani, 2020. "Examining freight performance of third-party logistics providers within the automotive industry in India: an environmental sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7565-7592, December.
    20. Jiangxia Liu & Sourish Sarkar & Sanjay Kumar & Zhenhu Jin, 2018. "An analysis of stock market impact from supply chain disruptions in Japan," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(1), pages 192-206, January.
    21. Lewis Akenji & Magnus Bengtsson, 2014. "Making Sustainable Consumption and Production the Core of Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, January.
    22. Klassen, Robert D. & Vereecke, Ann, 2012. "Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 103-115.
    23. Rajesh, R., 2020. "Sustainable supply chains in the Indian context: An integrative decision-making model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    24. R. Rajesh & Chandrasekharan Rajendran, 2020. "Relating Environmental, Social, and Governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1247-1267, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shubhendu Singh & Gaurvendra Singh, 2024. "Agroforestry for Sustainable Development: Assessing Frameworks to Drive Agricultural Sector Growth," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 22281-22317, September.
    2. Iyere Mary & Misopoulos Fotios, 2022. "The degree of stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chains: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 58(2), pages 9-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kannan, Devika & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta, 2014. "Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 432-447.
    2. Luthra, Sunil & Garg, Dixit & Haleem, Abid, 2015. "An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 37-50.
    3. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Luthra, Sunil & Rich, Nick & Kumar, Divesh & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Enablers to implement sustainable initiatives in agri-food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 379-393.
    4. Yigit Kazancoglu & Muhittin Sagnak & Yasanur Kayikci & Sachin Kumar Mangla, 2020. "Operational excellence in a green supply chain for environmental management: A case study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1532-1547, March.
    5. Mani, Venkatesh & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Mani, Kavitha T.N., 2020. "Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    7. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    8. Jiuping Xu & Xianglan Jiang & Zhibin Wu, 2016. "A Sustainable Performance Assessment Framework for Plastic Film Supply Chain Management from a Chinese Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Lanndon A. Ocampo, 2019. "Decision Modeling for Manufacturing Sustainability with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(1), pages 25-41, February.
    10. Su-Yol Lee, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Digital-Based Supply Chain Integration, and Firm Performance: A Cross-Country Empirical Comparison between South Korea and Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Graça Miranda Silva & Paulo J. Gomes & Joseph Sarkis, 2019. "The role of innovation in the implementation of green supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 819-832, July.
    12. K. E. K. Vimal & S. Vinodh & A. Raja, 2017. "Optimization of process parameters of SMAW process using NN-FGRA from the sustainability view point," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1459-1480, August.
    13. Ruifeng Gong & Jian Xue & Laijun Zhao & Oleksandra Zolotova & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Lartey, Theophilus A. & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Danso, Albert & Adomako, Samuel & Khan, Zaheer & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2021. "Environmental sustainability practices and offshoring activities of multinational corporations across emerging and developed markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    15. Geyi, Dan’Asabe Godwin & Yusuf, Yahaya & Menhat, Masha S. & Abubakar, Tijjani & Ogbuke, Nnamdi J., 2020. "Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Deepak Lamba & Devendra K. Yadav & Akhilesh Barve & Ganapati Panda, 2020. "Prioritizing barriers in reverse logistics of E-commerce supply chain using fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 381-403, June.
    17. Sarah Behnam & Raffaella Cagliano, 2016. "Be Sustainable to Be Innovative: An Analysis of Their Mutual Reinforcement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. María-José Verdecho & Faustino Alarcón-Valero & David Pérez-Perales & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz & Raúl Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2021. "A methodology to select suppliers to increase sustainability within supply chains," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1231-1251, December.
    19. Sini Laari & Juuso Töyli & Lauri Ojala, 2018. "The effect of a competitive strategy and green supply chain management on the financial and environmental performance of logistics service providers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 872-883, November.
    20. Shen, Liyin & Zhang, Zhenyu & Long, Zhijian, 2017. "Significant barriers to green procurement in real estate development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 160-168.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7278-:d:584963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.