IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7020-d579872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

7S Model for Technology Protection of Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunae Park

    (Department of IT Law, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Korea)

  • Youngcheon Yoo

    (Department of IT Law, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Korea)

  • Hwansoo Lee

    (Department of Industrial Security, Dankook University, Yongin-si 16890, Korea)

Abstract

Given the importance of technologies to organizations, technology leakages can cause considerable financial losses and threaten the survival of firms. Although organizations use technology protection diagnostic models to prevent such leakages, most diagnostic models focus on cybersecurity, and the evaluation system is complex, making it difficult for SMEs to use it. This makes them unsuitable for the general technology protection diagnosis of companies. Hence, this study proposes a diagnostic model that assesses these technology protection capabilities of organizations from personnel and administrative perspectives. Drawing upon the individual elements of the 7S model—shared values, strategy, structure, systems, staff, style, and skills—our model analyzes the influence of the elements on the technology protection capabilities of organizations. To determine this influence, the study conducts a questionnaire survey among 435 employees from large, larger medium-sized, and small and medium enterprises. Using the partial least squares and the artificial neural network methods, the study determines the ranking of the relative importance of the 7s elements. The results show that the shared values element most significantly influences these capabilities. The remaining elements influence the technology protection capabilities in the following order from the greatest to the least effect: staff, strategy, structure, systems, style, and skills. These findings highlight the significance of developing an awareness of the necessity of technology protection among all the members of an organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunae Park & Youngcheon Yoo & Hwansoo Lee, 2021. "7S Model for Technology Protection of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7020-:d:579872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meena Kumari Pradhan & Jungjoo Oh & Hwansoo Lee, 2018. "Understanding Travelers’ Behavior for Sustainable Smart Tourism: A Technology Readiness Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Jill Solomon & Aris Solomon & Chang–Young Park, 2002. "The Evolving Role of Institutional Investors in South Korean Corporate Governance: some empirical evidence," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 211-224, July.
    3. Jawon Kim & Chanwoo Lee & Hangbae Chang, 2020. "The Development of a Security Evaluation Model Focused on Information Leakage Protection for Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Yee-Loong Chong, Alain & Liu, Martin J. & Luo, Jun & Keng-Boon, Ooi, 2015. "Predicting RFID adoption in healthcare supply chain from the perspectives of users," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 66-75.
    5. Sangho Park & Yanghoon Kim & Gwangmin Park & Onechul Na & Hangbae Chang, 2018. "Research on Digital Forensic Readiness Design in a Cloud Computing-Based Smart Work Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Margaret A. Peteraf & Mark E. Bergen, 2003. "Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market‐based and resource‐based framework," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 1027-1041, October.
    7. Teybeh Abbasi Nejad & Mohammad Reza Behbodi & Mohammad Mehdi Ravanfar, 2015. "Analyzing Organizational Structure based on 7s model of McKinsey," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(5), pages 43-55, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Alexander Kalita & Alexander Chepurenko, 2020. "Competitiveness of Small and Medium Businesses and Competitive Pressure in the Manufacturing Industry," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 36-50.
    3. Tian , Xiaoguang & Prybutok, Victor & Mirzaei, Fouad & Dinulescu, Catalin C., 2020. "Millennials Acceptance of Insurance Telematics: An Integrative Empirical Study," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 23(1), pages 156-181, May.
    4. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Steffen Runge & Christian Schwens & Matthias Schulz, 2022. "The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 266-294, February.
    6. Hui-Lin Zhu & Ke-Zhi Yang, 2024. "The Spillover Effect of ESG Performance on Green Innovation—Evidence from Listed Companies in China A-Shares," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Simona Sternad Zabukovšek & Samo Bobek & Uroš Zabukovšek & Zoran Kalinić & Polona Tominc, 2022. "Enhancing PLS-SEM-Enabled Research with ANN and IPMA: Research Study of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems’ Acceptance Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Anna Marie Dyhr Ulrich & Svend Hollensen & Britta Boyd, 2014. "Entry Mode Strategies into the Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) Markets," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(3), pages 423-445, September.
    9. Tsung-Hung Lee & Fen-Hauh Jan, 2022. "Development and Validation of the Smart Tourism Experience Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Lui, Ariel K.H. & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2023. "A tough pill to swallow? The lessons learned from mandatory RFID adoption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    12. Yan-Feng He & Chie-Peng Chen & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2019. "The Key Factors Influencing Safety Analysis for Traditional Settlement Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.
    14. Arup Barua & Alexandra Ioanid, 2021. "Synergistic Competitive Advantage - The Modern Appeal of RBV and IO Theory in the Mergers and Acquisitions," Bulgarian Economic Papers bep-2021-06, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria // Center for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, revised Jul 2021.
    15. Ismail Gökdeniz & Cihat Kartal & Kivanc Kömürcü, 2017. "Strategic Assessment based on 7S McKinsey Model for a Business by Using Analytic Network Process (ANP)," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(6), pages 342-353, June.
    16. Chih-Yi, Su & Bou-Wen, Lin, 2021. "Attack and defense in patent-based competition: A new paradigm of strategic decision-making in the era of the fourth industrial revolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Theoharakis, Vasilis & Zheng, Yuyan & Zhang, Long, 2024. "Dynamic strategic marketing planning: The paradox of concurrently reconfiguring and implementing strategic marketing planning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Sharma, Manisha & Banerjee, Subhojit & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Role of social media on mobile banking adoption among consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Pinochet, Luis Hernan Contreras & de Gois, Fernanda Silva & Pardim, Vanessa Itacaramby & Onusic, Luciana Massaro, 2024. "Experimental study on the effect of adopting humanized and non-humanized chatbots on the factors measure the intensity of the user's perceived trust in the Yellow September campaign," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Tao, Feng & Wang, Liang & Fan, Tijun & Yu, Hao, 2022. "RFID adoption strategy in a retailer-dominant supply chain with competing suppliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 117-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7020-:d:579872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.