IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6971-d579008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A GIS Software Module for Environmental Impact Assessment of the Open Pit Mining Projects for Small Mining Operators in Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Zarubin

    (System Concepts And Applications, International Informatization Academy, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Larissa Statsenko

    (STEM Department, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5005, Australia)

  • Pavel Spiridonov

    (InnovEco Australia, Adelaide 5008, Australia)

  • Venera Zarubina

    (System Concepts And Applications, International Informatization Academy, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Noune Melkoumian

    (School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia)

  • Olga Salykova

    (School of Information Systems, A.Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University, Kostanay 110000, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This research article presents a software module for the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of open pit mines. The EIA software module has been developed based on the comprehensive examination of both country-specific (namely, Kazakhstan) and current international regulatory frameworks, legislation and EIA methodologies. EIA frameworks and methods have been critically evaluated, and mathematical models have been developed and implemented in the GIS software module ‘3D Quarry’. The proposed methodology and software module allows for optimised EIA calculations of open pit mines, aiming to minimise the negative impacts on the environment. The study presents an original methodology laid out as a basis for a software module for environmental impact assessment on atmosphere, water basins, soil and subsoil, tailored to the context of mining operations in Kazakhstan. The proposed software module offers an alternative to commercial off-the-shelf software packages currently used in the mining industry and is suitable for small mining operators in post-Soviet countries. It is anticipated that applications of the proposed software module will enable the transition to sustainable development in the Kazakh mining industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Zarubin & Larissa Statsenko & Pavel Spiridonov & Venera Zarubina & Noune Melkoumian & Olga Salykova, 2021. "A GIS Software Module for Environmental Impact Assessment of the Open Pit Mining Projects for Small Mining Operators in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6971-:d:579008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahimi, Esmaeil & Ghasemzadeh, Hasan, 2015. "A new algorithm to determine optimum cut-off grades considering technical, economical, environmental and social aspects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 51-63.
    2. Franks, Daniel M. & Boger, David V. & Côte, Claire M. & Mulligan, David R., 2011. "Sustainable development principles for the disposal of mining and mineral processing wastes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 114-122, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biswas, Pritam & Sinha, Rabindra Kumar & Sen, Phalguni, 2023. "A review of state-of-the-art techniques for the determination of the optimum cut-off grade of a metalliferous deposit with a bibliometric mapping in a surface mine planning context," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Devenin, Verónica, 2021. "Collaborative community development in mining regions: The Calama Plus and Creo Antofagasta programs in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Muibat Omotola Fashola & Veronica Mpode Ngole-Jeme & Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, 2016. "Heavy Metal Pollution from Gold Mines: Environmental Effects and Bacterial Strategies for Resistance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Rahimi, Esmaeil & Akbari, Afshin, 2016. "Application of KKT in determining the final destination of mined material in multi-processing mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 10-18.
    5. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Güner, Mehmet Oğuz & Kural, Orhan, 2024. "Effects of EU-Compliant mining waste regulation on Turkish mining sector: A review of characterization, classification, storage, management, recovery of mineral wastes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Araya, Natalia & Ramírez, Yendery & Cisternas, Luis A. & Kraslawski, Andrzej, 2021. "Use of real options to enhance water-energy nexus in mine tailings management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    7. Ojeda-Pereira, Iván & Campos-Medina, Fernando, 2021. "International trends in mining tailings publications: A descriptive bibliometric study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. World Bank, 2014. "Enhancing Environmental and Social Sustainability of Mining in Armenia," World Bank Publications - Reports 18957, The World Bank Group.
    9. Carlos Cacciuttolo & Edison Atencio, 2022. "Past, Present, and Future of Copper Mine Tailings Governance in Chile (1905–2022): A Review in One of the Leading Mining Countries in the World," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-41, October.
    10. Shahba, Sudabe & Arjmandi, Reza & Monavari, Masoud & Ghodusi, Jamal, 2017. "Application of multi-attribute decision-making methods in SWOT analysis of mine waste management (case study: Sirjan's Golgohar iron mine, Iran)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 67-76.
    11. Schoenberger, Erica, 2016. "Environmentally sustainable mining: The case of tailings storage facilities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 119-128.
    12. Vesna Popović & Jelena Živanović Miljković & Jonel Subić & Andrei Jean-Vasile & Nedelcu Adrian & Eugen Nicolăescu, 2015. "Sustainable Land Management in Mining Areas in Serbia and Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Justyna Kujawska & Małgorzata Pawłowska, 2020. "Effect of drill cuttings addition on physicochemical and chemical properties of soil and red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) growth," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Armstrong, Margaret & Langrené, Nicolas & Petter, Renato & Chen, Wen & Petter, Carlos, 2019. "Accounting for tailings dam failures in the valuation of mining projects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Rahimi, Esmaeil & Ghasemzadeh, Hasan, 2015. "A new algorithm to determine optimum cut-off grades considering technical, economical, environmental and social aspects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 51-63.
    16. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Zhao, Yongan & Zhao, Xin & Xu, Junwei & Smutka, Luboš & Bilan, Yuriy, 2024. "Mineral resource drivers in the global south: A case study of Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Huaqin Han & Jinchun Xue & Xiao Zhang & Xiaojuan Wang & Jiaxing Huang & Xun Dai, 2023. "Effect of Carbide Slag Combined with Biochar on Improving Acidic Soil of Copper Sulfide Mines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Baumber, Alex & Scerri, Moira & Schweinsberg, Stephen, 2019. "A social licence for the sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 12-23.
    19. Carlos Cacciuttolo & Alex Marinovic, 2023. "Experiences of Underground Mine Backfilling Using Mine Tailings Developed in the Andean Region of Peru: A Green Mining Solution to Reduce Socio-Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Mohammadi, Sadjad & Kakaie, Reza & Ataei, Mohammad & Pourzamani, Eshagh, 2017. "Determination of the optimum cut-off grades and production scheduling in multi-product open pit mines using imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 39-48.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6971-:d:579008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.