IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6481-d570231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Allocation Model of Construction Workforce for Work Resumption during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Layin Wang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Dong Zhao

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, School of Planning, Design and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Yanqi Zhong

    (School of AnDe, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an 710311, China)

Abstract

COVID-19 has posed challenges for the construction industry, such as precise pandemic control, sustainable labor relations, and loss minimization. In response to these challenges, this study has developed a decision model that optimizes workforce allocation for projects to achieve sustainable workforce management, a tradeoff between pandemic prevention and work resumption. The priority of project resumption was evaluated using basic characteristics, the long- and short-term strategies, and the regional pandemic situation. The energy level of skilled workers was graded according to construction team size, skill level, and experience. Sustainable allocation principles and paths were explored to target four different types of work resumption plans. We used the cellular automaton (CA) technique to simulate the sustainable allocation model. We also analyzed the similarity function of energy levels and the time-cost function of allocation. The case study of the SGJ Construction demonstrates that this allocation model can accurately simulate work resumption and provide a sustainable allocation decisions and tools under pandemic. Also, it implies balanced interests and concerns between construction companies and the society for work resumption during COVID-19.

Suggested Citation

  • Layin Wang & Dong Zhao & Yanqi Zhong, 2021. "Sustainable Allocation Model of Construction Workforce for Work Resumption during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6481-:d:570231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6481/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6481/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drezet, L.-E. & Billaut, J.-C., 2008. "A project scheduling problem with labour constraints and time-dependent activities requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 217-225, March.
    2. J. Arturo Castillo-Salazar & Dario Landa-Silva & Rong Qu, 2016. "Workforce scheduling and routing problems: literature survey and computational study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(1), pages 39-67, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Felipe Araya & Paula Poblete & Luis Arturo Salazar & Omar Sánchez & Leonardo Sierra-Varela & Álvaro Filun, 2024. "Exploring the Influence of Construction Companies Characteristics on Their Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Chilean Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    2. Pahlevani, Delaram & Abbasi, Babak & Hearne, John W. & Eberhard, Andrew, 2022. "A cluster-based algorithm for home health care planning: A case study in Australia," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Park, Jongyoon & Han, Jinil & Lee, Kyungsik, 2024. "Integer optimization models and algorithms for the multi-period non-shareable resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 43-59.
    4. Lin, B.M.T. & Liu, S.T., 2008. "Maximizing the reward in the relocation problem with generalized due dates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 55-63, September.
    5. Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Ruhul A. Sarker & Daryl L. Essam, 2020. "Single mode resource constrained project scheduling with unreliable resources," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1369-1403, September.
    6. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Xizi Qiao & Ying Yang & Yu Guo & Yong Jin & Shuaian Wang, 2024. "Optimal Routing and Scheduling of Flag State Control Officers in Maritime Transportation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Julien Maheut & Jose P. Garcia-Sabater & Julio J. Garcia-Sabater & Sofia Garcia-Manglano, 2024. "Solving the multisite staff planning and scheduling problem in a sheltered employment centre that employs workers with intellectual disabilities by MILP: a Spanish case study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(3), pages 569-591, September.
    9. Xiang Li & Haoyue Fan & Jiaming Liu & Qifeng Xun, 2022. "Staff scheduling in blood collection problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 365-400, September.
    10. Maria Fleischer Fauske & Erlend Øby Hoff, 2016. "From F-16 to F-35: Optimizing the Training of Pilots in the Royal Norwegian Air Force," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 326-333, August.
    11. Marlin Ulmer & Martin Savelsbergh, 2020. "Workforce Scheduling in the Era of Crowdsourced Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 1113-1133, July.
    12. Neda Tanoumand & Tonguç Ünlüyurt, 2021. "An exact algorithm for the resource constrained home health care vehicle routing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 397-425, September.
    13. Snauwaert, Jakob & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2023. "A classification and new benchmark instances for the multi-skilled resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 1-19.
    14. Guastaroba, G. & Côté, J.-F. & Coelho, L.C., 2021. "The Multi-Period Workforce Scheduling and Routing Problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Mosquera, Federico & Smet, Pieter & Vanden Berghe, Greet, 2019. "Flexible home care scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 80-95.
    16. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    17. Fangzhou Yan & Huaxin Qiu & Dongya Han, 2023. "Lagrangian Heuristic for Multi-Depot Technician Planning of Product Distribution and Installation with a Lunch Break," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Stefan Fedtke & Nils Boysen, 2017. "Gantry crane and shuttle car scheduling in modern rail–rail transshipment yards," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 473-503, March.
    19. Hartmann, Sönke, 2011. "Project scheduling with resource capacities and requests varying with time," Working Paper Series 01/2011, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    20. Hosseini, Amir & Otto, Alena & Pesch, Erwin, 2024. "Scheduling in manufacturing with transportation: Classification and solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 821-843.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6481-:d:570231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.