IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5944-d561647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Connectivity Analysis and Optimization of Qianjiangyuan National Park, Zhejiang Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yangjing Peng

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Minghao Meng

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    School of Tourism and Health, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Zhihao Huang

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ruifeng Wang

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guofa Cui

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

As natural ecosystems in most parts of the world come under increasing human influence, fragmentation is becoming the major driving factor of the global biodiversity crisis. Therefore, connectivity between habitat patches is becoming even more important. China began building national parks with the primary purpose of protecting nationally representative natural ecosystems and maintaining the integrity of their structure, processes and functions. Research is necessary to improve the internal connectivity of national parks and to propose suggestions for existing functional zoning and biological corridors. In this study, Qianjiangyuan National Park was selected as an example park, and landscape fragmentation was evaluated exponentially and simulated visually. The habitat characteristics of protected species in the region, morphological spatial pattern analysis and the delta of the probability of connectivity were used together to identify key habitat patches and their importance levels in the study area. Potential habitat corridors in the region were then obtained using least-cost path analysis and gravity modeling methods based on the distribution of key habitat and the migration costs of target species. The results of this study show that the disturbed landscape of the study area is dominated by tea plantations and drylands, with central roads being an important factor affecting the overall landscape connectivity. In terms of the distribution of key habitat patches, the mountains have a high value. In terms of area, their size is not directly proportional to their importance for maintaining landscape connectivity in the region, but large area patches are generally of higher importance. In terms of distance, key habitats that are closer to each other have a stronger correlation and a greater possibility for species migration. Combined with the functional zoning of Qianjiangyuan National Park, the setting of strictly protected areas and recreational areas is reasonable, and traditional use areas and ecological conservation areas could be appropriately adjusted according to the distribution of key habitats. The important corridor in the middle of the ecological conservation area is crucial for the overall connectivity of the national park, and the connectivity between strict protected areas will depend on successful protection of the ecological conservation area.

Suggested Citation

  • Yangjing Peng & Minghao Meng & Zhihao Huang & Ruifeng Wang & Guofa Cui, 2021. "Landscape Connectivity Analysis and Optimization of Qianjiangyuan National Park, Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5944-:d:561647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Habtemariam, Bereket Tesfamariam & Fang, Qinhua, 2016. "Zoning for a multiple-use marine protected area using spatial multi-criteria analysis: The case of the Sheik Seid Marine National Park in Eritrea," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 135-143.
    2. Jianliang Zhang & Fangzheng Liu & Guofa Cui, 2014. "The Efficacy of Landscape-Level Conservation in Changbai Mountain Biosphere Reserve, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-9, April.
    3. Shiyi Guo & Kaoru Saito & Weida Yin & Chang Su, 2018. "Landscape Connectivity as a Tool in Green Space Evaluation and Optimization of the Haidan District, Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Lindsey Bargelt & Marie-Josée Fortin & Dennis L Murray, 2020. "Assessing connectivity and the contribution of private lands to protected area networks in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiangshou Dong & Quanzhi Yuan & Yaowen Kou & Shujun Li & Ping Ren, 2023. "Distribution and Ecological Network Construction of National Natural Protected Areas in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Bo Li & Hao Ouyang & Tong Wang & Tian Dong, 2023. "Coupling Relationship between Rural Settlement Patterns and Landscape Fragmentation in Woodlands and Biological Reserves—A Case of Nanshan National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Junhao Zhang & Xinjun Wang & Yujing Xie, 2021. "Implication of Buffer Zones Delineation Considering the Landscape Connectivity and Influencing Patch Structural Factors in Nature Reserves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orit Rotem-Mindali & Noam Katzir & Oren Perez, 2024. "Identifying Regulatory Barriers in the Management of Ecological Corridors in an Increasingly Congested Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Zixuan Lian & Xianhui Feng, 2022. "Urban Green Space Pattern in Core Cities of the Greater Bay Area Based on Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Xiangnan Fan & Yuning Cheng & Fangqi Tan & Tianyi Zhao, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of the Ecological Security Pattern in Liyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Hui Tao & Ying Nan & Zhi-Feng Liu, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Forest in the Transnational Area of Changbai Mountain from 1977 to 2015: A Comparative Analysis of the Chinese and DPRK Sub-Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Luis Santiago Castillo & Camilo Andrés Correa Ayram & Clara L. Matallana Tobón & Germán Corzo & Alexandra Areiza & Roy González-M. & Felipe Serrano & Luis Chalán Briceño & Felipe Sánchez Puertas & Ale, 2020. "Connectivity of Protected Areas: Effect of Human Pressure and Subnational Contributions in the Ecoregions of Tropical Andean Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Hui Ye & Zhaoping Yang & Xiaoliang Xu, 2020. "Ecological Corridors Analysis Based on MSPA and MCR Model—A Case Study of the Tomur World Natural Heritage Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Zhiming Li & Zhengxi Fan & Shiguang Shen, 2018. "Urban Green Space Suitability Evaluation Based on the AHP-CV Combined Weight Method: A Case Study of Fuping County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Junze Liu & Xiaoyuan Huang & Huijun Guo & Zhuoya Zhang & Xiaona Li & Mengxiao Ge, 2022. "Study on Functional Zoning Method of National Park Based on MCDA: The Case of the Proposed “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Haijiao Liu & Yonghong Ma & Qing Liu & Yan Song, 2020. "Decision-Making of Green Space Utilization and Protection in Urban Fringe Based on Biodiversity Trade-Off," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Huiying Li & Dianfeng Liu & Jianhua He, 2022. "Exploring Differentiated Conservation Priorities of Urban Green Space Based on Tradeoffs of Ecological Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Peng Li & Yuxiao Zhang & Weikun Lu & Min Zhao & Meng Zhu, 2020. "Identification of Priority Conservation Areas for Protected Rivers Based on Ecosystem Integrity and Authenticity: A Case Study of the Qingzhu River, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Jia, Ruru & Gao, Jinwu & Gao, Feng, 2022. "Robust ocean zoning for conservation, fishery and marine renewable energy with co-location strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    13. Sena-Vittini, Mildred & Gomez-Valenzuela, Victor & Ramirez, Katerin, 2023. "Social perceptions and conservation in protected areas: Taking stock of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Kunyuan Wanghe & Xinle Guo & Xiaofeng Luan & Kai Li, 2019. "Assessment of Urban Green Space Based on Bio-Energy Landscape Connectivity: A Case Study on Tongzhou District in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Ronizi, Saeed Reza Akbarian & Mokarram, Marzieh & Negahban, Saeed, 2020. "Utilizing multi-criteria decision to determine the best location for the ecotourism in the east and central of Fars province, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Zhihao Huang & Yangjing Peng & Ruifeng Wang & Guofa Cui & Bo Zhang & Nachuan Lu, 2021. "Exploring the Rapid Assessment Method for Nature Reserve Landscape Protection Effectiveness—A Case Study of Liancheng National Nature Reserve, Gansu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5944-:d:561647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.