IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i11p1882-d951210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Functional Zoning Method of National Park Based on MCDA: The Case of the Proposed “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Junze Liu

    (School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University (SWFU), 650224 Kunming, China)

  • Xiaoyuan Huang

    (School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University (SWFU), 650224 Kunming, China)

  • Huijun Guo

    (National Plateau Wetlands Research Center, Southwest Forestry University (SWFU), 650233 Kunming, China)

  • Zhuoya Zhang

    (School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University (SWFU), 650224 Kunming, China)

  • Xiaona Li

    (School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University (SWFU), 650224 Kunming, China)

  • Mengxiao Ge

    (School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University (SWFU), 650224 Kunming, China)

Abstract

In a national park master plan, functional zoning plays a key role in developing differentiated zoning controls that achieve multiple park construction objectives. In this study, a geographical attribute code and basic zoning elements are developed for the proposed “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” National Park, followed by the development of spatial multi-criteria sets and weight sets to determine the suitability of the land. Next, we use a clustering algorithm and conflict unit prioritization to allocate space for multi-target units to get the preliminary zoning schemes, and then identify stable units and unstable units through sensitivity analysis. Ultimately, the functional zoning of the National Park was determined. According to the results, the proposed “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” National Park can be divided into nine types of 164 landscape units; the highest land suitability values of each zone showed the traits of differentiation and aggregation in spatial distribution; there are 97 stable units and 67 unstable units; approximately 62.83% and 37.17% of the total park area can be divided into core conservation area (primary sensitive area and secondary sensitive area) and general control area (ecological activity area and ecological control area). By implementing a comprehensive assessment and decision-making process, the defined functional zones are precise and simple to recognize on the ground, and they adhere to the area proportions needed by national standards. Furthermore, the functional zoning is clustered, which avoids the fragmentation of the zoning results causing difficulties in management, and serves as a point of reference for the functional zoning approaches used in other proposed national parks in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Junze Liu & Xiaoyuan Huang & Huijun Guo & Zhuoya Zhang & Xiaona Li & Mengxiao Ge, 2022. "Study on Functional Zoning Method of National Park Based on MCDA: The Case of the Proposed “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1882-:d:951210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Habtemariam, Bereket Tesfamariam & Fang, Qinhua, 2016. "Zoning for a multiple-use marine protected area using spatial multi-criteria analysis: The case of the Sheik Seid Marine National Park in Eritrea," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 135-143.
    2. Víctor Rincón & Javier Velázquez & Javier Gutiérrez & Beatriz Sánchez & Ana Hernando & Antonio García-Abril & Tomás Santamaría & Daniel Sánchez-Mata, 2019. "Evaluating European Conservation Areas and Proposal of New Zones of Conservation under the Habitats Directive. Application to Spanish Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asyma Koshim & Aigul Sergeyeva & Yerkin Kakimzhanov & Aliya Aktymbayeva & Mereke Sakypbek & Akmaral Sapiyeva, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Ecotourism in “Altynemel” National Park, Kazakhstan: Assessment through the Perception of Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Li & Yuxiao Zhang & Weikun Lu & Min Zhao & Meng Zhu, 2020. "Identification of Priority Conservation Areas for Protected Rivers Based on Ecosystem Integrity and Authenticity: A Case Study of the Qingzhu River, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Jia, Ruru & Gao, Jinwu & Gao, Feng, 2022. "Robust ocean zoning for conservation, fishery and marine renewable energy with co-location strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Yangjing Peng & Minghao Meng & Zhihao Huang & Ruifeng Wang & Guofa Cui, 2021. "Landscape Connectivity Analysis and Optimization of Qianjiangyuan National Park, Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Ronizi, Saeed Reza Akbarian & Mokarram, Marzieh & Negahban, Saeed, 2020. "Utilizing multi-criteria decision to determine the best location for the ecotourism in the east and central of Fars province, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1882-:d:951210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.