IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3904-d528170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Rapid Assessment Method for Nature Reserve Landscape Protection Effectiveness—A Case Study of Liancheng National Nature Reserve, Gansu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihao Huang

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yangjing Peng

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ruifeng Wang

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guofa Cui

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bo Zhang

    (Twenty First Century Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100089, China)

  • Nachuan Lu

    (Twenty First Century Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100089, China)

Abstract

The rapid assessment of the effectiveness of landscape protection in nature reserves is of great significance for the scientific formulation of protection and management countermeasures. There is also an urgent problem to be solved for the construction and management of nature reserves in China. Using high-resolution remote sensing image data, this study analyzes the landscape dynamics in the Liancheng National Nature Reserve (LNNR) and their driving factors since the reserve’s promotion to the national level in 2005, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation method for the effectiveness of landscape protection in protected areas based on the Landscape Transfer Index (LTI), Protected Landscape Integrity Index (PLII), and Interfered Landscape Sprawl Index (ILSI). Between 2006 and 2019, the area of protected landscape—namely woodland, grassland, and water—in the LNNR decreased, while the area of interfered landscape such as residential land, industrial and mining land, and water conservancy facility land increased. The LTI was −0.14, and among the driving factors, the development of industry and mining, land use by indigenous inhabitants, and the development of the transport industry made the highest contributions to the landscape transfer tendency, respectively 34.79%, 28.98%, and 17.30%. The results indicate that the overall quality of the landscape declined slightly during this period, mainly as a result of industrial and mining development, indigenous use of the land, and road construction. The PLII decreased from 82.7 to 68.7; this result indicates that the spatial pattern of the protected landscape became more fragmented, and the degree of human interference in the landscape increased. The ILSI increased from 26.61 to 26.68 which indicates that the scope of influence of human interference did not change significantly. The effectiveness of landscape protection in the LNNR is low. Despite the insignificant nature of these changes, they still require attention and timely remedial measures. The methodology proposed in this study may be applicable to the rapid assessment of the effectiveness of landscape conservation in various types of nature conservation sites around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihao Huang & Yangjing Peng & Ruifeng Wang & Guofa Cui & Bo Zhang & Nachuan Lu, 2021. "Exploring the Rapid Assessment Method for Nature Reserve Landscape Protection Effectiveness—A Case Study of Liancheng National Nature Reserve, Gansu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3904-:d:528170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianliang Zhang & Fangzheng Liu & Guofa Cui, 2014. "The Efficacy of Landscape-Level Conservation in Changbai Mountain Biosphere Reserve, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Richard A. Fuller & Eve McDonald-Madden & Kerrie A. Wilson & Josie Carwardine & Hedley S. Grantham & James E. M. Watson & Carissa J. Klein & David C. Green & Hugh P. Possingham, 2010. "Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7304), pages 365-367, July.
    3. Sean L. Maxwell & Victor Cazalis & Nigel Dudley & Michael Hoffmann & Ana S. L. Rodrigues & Sue Stolton & Piero Visconti & Stephen Woodley & Naomi Kingston & Edward Lewis & Martine Maron & Bernardo B. , 2020. "Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7828), pages 217-227, October.
    4. Jonathan M. Chase & Shane A. Blowes & Tiffany M. Knight & Katharina Gerstner & Felix May, 2020. "Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss," Nature, Nature, vol. 584(7820), pages 238-243, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhilong Zhao & Zengzeng Hu & Jun Zhou & Ruliang Kan & Wangjun Li, 2023. "Response of Two Major Lakes in the Changtang National Nature Reserve, Tibetan Plateau to Climate and Anthropogenic Changes over the Past 50 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weerasena, Lakmali & Shier, Douglas & Tonkyn, David & McFeaters, Mark & Collins, Christopher, 2023. "A sequential approach to reserve design with compactness and contiguity considerations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    2. Wu, Chen-Fa & Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Chen, Szu-Hung & Trac, Luu Van Thong, 2024. "Assessing the efficiency of bird habitat conservation strategies in farmland ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    3. Bernard W T Coetzee & Kevin J Gaston & Steven L Chown, 2014. "Local Scale Comparisons of Biodiversity as a Test for Global Protected Area Ecological Performance: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Claudia Múnera-Roldán & Matthew J. Colloff & Jamie Pittock & Lorrae Kerkhoff, 2024. "Aligning adaptation and sustainability agendas: lessons from protected areas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.
    6. repec:dav:journl:y:2016:v:7:i:11:p:1272-1289 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Clare Morrison & Clay Simpkins & J Guy Castley & Ralf C Buckley, 2012. "Tourism and the Conservation of Critically Endangered Frogs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.
    8. Auliz-Ortiz, Daniel Martín & Arroyo-Rodríguez, Víctor & Mendoza, Eduardo & Martínez-Ramos, Miguel, 2023. "Are there trade-offs between conservation and development caused by Mexican protected areas?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Hui Tao & Ying Nan & Zhi-Feng Liu, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Forest in the Transnational Area of Changbai Mountain from 1977 to 2015: A Comparative Analysis of the Chinese and DPRK Sub-Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Qiaoqiao Zhan & Katsunori Furuya & Xiaolan Tang & Zhehui Li, 2024. "Policy Development in China’s Protected Scenic and Historic Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Erik Aschenbrand & Thomas Michler, 2021. "Why Do UNESCO Biosphere Reserves Get Less Recognition than National Parks? A Landscape Research Perspective on Protected Area Narratives in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Gackstetter, David & von Bloh, Malte & Hannus, Veronika & Meyer, Sebastian T. & Weisser, Wolfgang & Luksch, Claudia & Asseng, Senthold, 2023. "Autonomous field management – An enabler of sustainable future in agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    13. Jonathan Higgins & John Zablocki & Amy Newsock & Andras Krolopp & Phillip Tabas & Michael Salama, 2021. "Durable Freshwater Protection: A Framework for Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Protection for Freshwater Ecosystems and the Values They Sustain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Pannell, David J., 2013. "Value for Money in Environmental Policy and Environmental Economics," Working Papers 146501, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    15. Pratzer, Marie & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Antongiovanni, Marina & Aragon, Roxana & Baldi, Germán & Czaplicki Cabezas, Stasiek & de la Vega-Leinert, Cristina A. & Dhyani, Shalini & Diepart, Jean-Christophe, 2024. "An actor-centered, scalable land system typology for addressing biodiversity loss in the world’s tropical dry woodlands," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 86, pages 1-14.
    16. Khara Grieger & Christopher L. Cummings, 2022. "Informing environmental health and risk priorities through local outreach and extension," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 388-401, September.
    17. Sicheng Wang & Feng Lu & Guoen Wei, 2022. "Direct and Spillover Effects of Urban Land Expansion on Habitat Quality in Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Craig Packer & Stephen Polasky, 2018. "Reconciling corruption with conservation triage: Should investments shift from the last best places?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-6, August.
    19. Mingarro, Mario & Lobo, Jorge M., 2023. "European National Parks protect their surroundings but not everywhere: A study using land use/land cover dynamics derived from CORINE Land Cover data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    20. Yangjing Peng & Minghao Meng & Zhihao Huang & Ruifeng Wang & Guofa Cui, 2021. "Landscape Connectivity Analysis and Optimization of Qianjiangyuan National Park, Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    21. Sena-Vittini, Mildred & Gomez-Valenzuela, Victor & Ramirez, Katerin, 2023. "Social perceptions and conservation in protected areas: Taking stock of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3904-:d:528170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.