IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5886-d560861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward Sustainable Governance: Strategic Analysis of the Smart City Seoul Portal in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Yejin Yoo

    (Department of Smart Cities Research Center, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyang-daero, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

Abstract

Currently, the efforts of many cities around the world, including Seoul, are aimed at transforming themselves into smart cities under a governance vision. Thus, the purpose of this study is to propose a reinforcement plan for the ’Smart Seoul’ portal to develop into a cooperative, participatory, and network governance. We select four representative smart city portals from Barcelona, Amsterdam, Columbus, and Singapore and evaluate their main features and roles. We sort the features analyzed in each portal based on certain governance strategies, employing their key features as part of our evaluation criteria model. These evaluation criteria are used to analyze the ‘Smart Seoul’ portal and create a strengthening plan. The plan comprises a set of actions intended to improve the portal’s capabilities in terms of disclosure of information, the participation of stakeholders, and civil petition services. When this plan is implemented, the resulting optimal information disclosure through the ‘Smart Seoul’ portal will ensure the transparency of Seoul’s administration and create an environment in which citizens can actively participate in solving urban problems and making decisions. In addition, the results of this study will be an important guideline for the design and operation of smart city portals, and the catalogs for key features are expected to be used to make smart city portal design regulations in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yejin Yoo, 2021. "Toward Sustainable Governance: Strategic Analysis of the Smart City Seoul Portal in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5886-:d:560861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Lukrafka, Tatiany Oleques & Silva, Diego Souza & Echeveste, Marcia, 2020. "A geographic picture of Lean adoption in the public sector: Cases, approaches, and a refreshed agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 506-517.
    3. Mika Raunio & Nadja Nordling & Mika Kautonen & Petri Rasanen, 2018. "Open Innovation Platforms as a Knowledge Triangle Policy Tool – Evidence from Finland," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 62-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dagmara Kociuba & Mariusz Sagan & Waldemar Kociuba, 2023. "Toward the Smart City Ecosystem Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. André Luis Azevedo Guedes & Jeferson Carvalho Alvarenga & Maurício Dos Santos Sgarbi Goulart & Martius Vicente Rodriguez y Rodriguez & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2018. "Smart Cities: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Romina Fucà & Serena Cubico & Giuseppe Favretto & João Leitão, 2019. "The “Local Town Market Area” in Enna, Sicily: Using the Psychology of Sustainability to Propose Sustainable and Developmental Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Effrosyni Taraza & Sofia Anastasiadou & Andreas Masouras & Christos Papademetriou, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Manville, Graham & Greatbanks, Richard, 2020. "Performance management in hybrid organisations: A study in social housing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 533-545.
    6. Schade Katrin & Müller Andre & Holdack Eric & Hübscher Marcus & Lurie Katja & Schulze Juana, 2021. "Digitalization and City Center Resilience. Exploring Visitors’ Perceptions in Leipzig, Germany," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 65(3-4), pages 132-146, December.
    7. Lidija Lalicic & Irem Önder, 2018. "Residents’ Involvement in Urban Tourism Planning: Opportunities from a Smart City Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Emily M. Simonsen & Rodrigo F. Herrera & Edison Atencio, 2023. "Benefits and Difficulties of the Implementation of Lean Construction in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Raz Weiner & Filipe Mello Rose & Batel Yossef Ravid & Jörg Rainer Noennig & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2024. "Place-bound planning support systems for deliberation: Affording better communication and comprehension," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(9), pages 2055-2073, November.
    10. Sparrow, Ashley D. & Traoré, Adama, 2018. "Limits to the applicability of the innovation platform approach for agricultural development in West Africa: Socio-economic factors constrain stakeholder engagement and confidence," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 335-343.
    11. Tai-Shan Hu & Ssu-Chi Pan & Hai-Ping Lin, 2021. "Development, Innovation, and Circular Stimulation for a Knowledge-Based City: Key Thoughts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Daniel Catalá‐Pérez & María de‐Miguel‐Molina, 2021. "Analyzing Territorial and Sectorial Dimensions of Public–Private Partnerships in Science, Technology, and Innovation policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(1), pages 113-138, January.
    13. Annuska Rantanen & Juho Rajaniemi, 2020. "Urban planning in the post-zoning era: From hierarchy to self-organisation in the reform of the Finnish Land Use and Building Act," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 321-335, February.
    14. Chunyu Zhang & Wenge Zeng, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluating the Construction of a Digital Supervision Platform for Digital Trade Systems: a Multilateral Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12503-12534, September.
    15. Eva Lieberherr & Olivia Odom Green, 2018. "Green Infrastructure through Citizen Stormwater Management: Policy Instruments, Participation and Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Dorota Bednarska-Olejniczak & Jarosław Olejniczak & Libuše Svobodová, 2019. "Towards a Smart and Sustainable City with the Involvement of Public Participation—The Case of Wroclaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-33, January.
    17. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Natalya KOSTKO & Mariya BATYREVA & Irina PECHERKINA & Oksana LAZAREVA, 2021. "Are Smart Technologies An Instrument Of Active City Dwellers?," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(3), pages 73-91, August.
    19. Angel L. González Morales, 2019. "Affective Sustainability. The Creation and Transmission of Affect through an Educative Process: An Instrument for the Construction of more Sustainable Citizens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Marek Banczyk & Joanne Laban & Jason Potts, 2018. "Choosing cities: a behavioural economic approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(3), pages 463-477, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5886-:d:560861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.