IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5775-d559146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eucalyptus globulus Coppices in Portugal: Influence of Site and Percentage of Residues Collected for Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Malico

    (Departamento de Engenharia Mecatrónica, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana Cristina Gonçalves

    (Departamento de Engenharia Rural, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Instituto Mediterrânico de Agricultura, Ambiente e Desenvolvimento (MED), Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada, Universidade de Évora, Apartado 94, 7002-544 Évora, Portugal)

Abstract

Studies that quantify forest bioenergy potentials hardly address the questions of site quality, proportion and type of residues removed from the stands, and environmental impacts of those removals. However, those factors are important for energy-potential results and forest sustainability. This study compares, in terms of residual biomass availability for energy production and of sustainability, different locations, site indices, and forest management strategies in Eucalyptus globulus stands for pulp and paper in northern and central Portugal. A growth and production simulator was used to calculate the availability of residues and the area needed to supply a biomass-fired power plant under a variety of scenarios. Regions with more rainfall generate more residues, but site index and quantity and type of residues harvested are the most important factors. Under the different scenarios analyzed, the amount of residues potentially harvested range from 0.7 to 4.3 Mg ha −1 a −1 , the upper bound corresponding to a scenario where stumps are valorized. The maximization of residue removal maximizes the bioenergy produced but has to be considered prudently. Studies indicate that stump removal has limited effect on Eucalyptus globulus stand productivity, diversity, and system sustainability, but impacts of residue removals increase with a decrease in site index.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Malico & Ana Cristina Gonçalves, 2021. "Eucalyptus globulus Coppices in Portugal: Influence of Site and Percentage of Residues Collected for Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5775-:d:559146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5775/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arteaga-Pérez, Luis E. & Segura, Cristina & Bustamante-García, Verónica & Gómez Cápiro, Oscar & Jiménez, Romel, 2015. "Torrefaction of wood and bark from Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens: Focus on volatile evolution vs feasible temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1731-1741.
    2. Lauri, Pekka & Forsell, Nicklas & Gusti, Mykola & Havlík, Petr & Obersteiner, Michael, 2019. "Global Woody Biomass Harvest Volumes and Forest Area Use Under Different SSP-RCP Scenarios," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 34(3-4), pages 285-309, November.
    3. Malico, Isabel & Nepomuceno Pereira, Ricardo & Gonçalves, Ana Cristina & Sousa, Adélia M.O., 2019. "Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 960-977.
    4. Tryggve Persson & Gustaf Egnell, 2018. "Stump harvesting for bioenergy: A review of climatic and environmental impacts in northern Europe and America," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(6), November.
    5. Bryngemark, Elina, 2019. "Second generation biofuels and the competition for forest raw materials: A partial equilibrium analysis of Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Solberg, Birger & Moiseyev, Alex & Hansen, Jon Øvrum & Horn, Svein Jarle & Øverland, Margareth, 2021. "Wood for food: Economic impacts of sustainable use of forest biomass for salmon feed production in Norway," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Giuseppe Maggiotto & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2023. "Thermochemical Technologies for the Optimization of Olive Wood Biomass Energy Exploitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Przemysław Motyl & Danuta Król & Sławomir Poskrobko & Marek Juszczak, 2020. "Numerical Modelling and Experimental Verification of the Low-Emission Biomass Combustion Process in a Domestic Boiler with Flue Gas Flow around the Combustion Chamber," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Barta-Rajnai, E. & Wang, L. & Sebestyén, Z. & Barta, Z. & Khalil, R. & Skreiberg, Ø. & Grønli, M. & Jakab, E. & Czégény, Z., 2017. "Comparative study on the thermal behavior of untreated and various torrefied bark, stem wood, and stump of Norway spruce," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1043-1054.
    6. Leanda C. Garvie & David J. Lee & Biljana Kulišić, 2024. "Towards a Bioeconomy: Supplying Forest Residues for the Australian Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Emily Hope & Bruno Gagnon & Vanja Avdić, 2020. "Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change Policies on the Market for Forest Industrial Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Moya, Roger & Rodríguez-Zúñiga, Ana & Puente-Urbina, Allen & Gaitán-Álvarez, Johanna, 2018. "Study of light, middle and severe torrefaction and effects of extractives and chemical compositions on torrefaction process by thermogravimetric analysis in five fast-growing plantations of Costa Rica," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Daigneault, Adam & Baker, Justin S. & Guo, Jinggang & Lauri, Pekka & Favero, Alice & Forsell, Nicklas & Johnston, Craig & Ohrel, Sara & Sohngen, Brent, 2021. "How the Future of the Global Forest Sink Depends on Timber Demand, Forest Management, and Carbon Prices," CEnREP Working Papers 340059, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Parisa Heidarnejad & Hadi Genceli & Nasim Hashemian & Mustafa Asker & Mohammad Al-Rawi, 2024. "Biomass-Fueled Organic Rankine Cycles: State of the Art and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, August.
    11. Aneta Kulanovic & Johan Nordensvärd, 2021. "Exploring the Political Discursive Lock-Ins on Sustainable Aviation in Sweden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Guillermo Martínez-Rodríguez & Juan-Carlos Baltazar & Amanda L. Fuentes-Silva & Rafael García-Gutiérrez, 2022. "Economic and Environmental Assessment Using Two Renewable Sources of Energy to Produce Heat and Power for Industrial Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Magiri-Skouloudi, Despina & Grimekis, Dimitrios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Εnergy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass-fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 252-269.
    14. Jaworek, A. & Sobczyk, A.T. & Marchewicz, A. & Krupa, A. & Czech, T., 2021. "Particulate matter emission control from small residential boilers after biomass combustion. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Glasenapp, S. & Fonseca, M. & Weimar, H. & Döring, P. & Aguilar, F.X., 2021. "Conversion factors for residential wood energy in the European Union: an introduction to harmonizing units of measurement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Rijo, Bruna & Soares Dias, Ana Paula & Ramos, Marta & Ameixa, Marcelo, 2022. "Valorization of forest waste biomass by catalyzed pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Ozgen, S. & Cernuschi, S. & Caserini, S., 2021. "An overview of nitrogen oxides emissions from biomass combustion for domestic heat production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Svetlana Proskurina & Clara Mendoza-Martinez, 2023. "Expectations for Bioenergy Considering Carbon Neutrality Targets in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Vincent Egenolf & Gibran Vita & Martin Distelkamp & Franziska Schier & Rebekka Hüfner & Stefan Bringezu, 2021. "The Timber Footprint of the German Bioeconomy—State of the Art and Past Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Schipfer, F. & Mäki, E. & Schmieder, U. & Lange, N. & Schildhauer, T. & Hennig, C. & Thrän, D., 2022. "Status of and expectations for flexible bioenergy to support resource efficiency and to accelerate the energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5775-:d:559146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.