IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5558-d555790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Landscape Attributes on Campuses Bird Species Richness and Diversity, Implications for Eco-Friendly Urban Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Zhang

    (Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Chao Jiang

    (Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Sheng Chen

    (Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Yuanyuan Zhang

    (School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Hui Shi

    (Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Bin Chen

    (Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Lingfeng Mao

    (Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Landscape changes due to urban expansion may severely influence urban biodiversity through direct and indirect effects. Hence, a comprehensive understanding of the urban expansion effects on species diversity is essential for conservation biologists, urban planners, and policymakers to help design more practical and effective conservation strategies. Here, based on monthly bird survey data of 12 university campuses distributed in the center and the Xianlin university town of Nanjing city, we first compared the differences of the campuses bird species richness, Shannon-Wiener, and Simpson indices. Then, we analyzed the effects of a variety of landscape attributes on the campuses bird species richness. Unlike other studies, we also constructed a 2 km buffer area surrounding each campus and analyzed the effects of the landscape attributes of the buffer area on species richness. We found that bird species richness was higher in the campus of Xianlin compared to those in the center. Landscape attributes played an important role on bird species richness, especially for the determinants in the buffer area. Specifically, species richness, Shannon-Wiener, and Simpson indices increased with the increasing area of water and green space both within the campus and the buffer area. Not surprisingly, bird species richness and diversity were more affected by fragmentation of the buffer area, increasing with the aggregation index and decreasing with the splitting index. Our study emphasized that landscape attributes of both campuses and buffer areas determined bird species richness and diversity, offering several practical implications for urban biodiversity maintenance and eco-friendly urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Zhang & Chao Jiang & Sheng Chen & Yuanyuan Zhang & Hui Shi & Bin Chen & Lingfeng Mao, 2021. "Effects of Landscape Attributes on Campuses Bird Species Richness and Diversity, Implications for Eco-Friendly Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5558-:d:555790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5558/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5558/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert I. McDonald & Andressa V. Mansur & Fernando Ascensão & M’lisa Colbert & Katie Crossman & Thomas Elmqvist & Andrew Gonzalez & Burak Güneralp & Dagmar Haase & Maike Hamann & Oliver Hillel & Kangn, 2020. "Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 16-24, January.
    2. Boeing, Geoff, 2019. "The Morphology and Circuity of Walkable and Drivable Street Networks," SocArXiv edj2s, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Abastante & Isabella M. Lami & Luigi La Riccia & Marika Gaballo, 2020. "Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Mohammad Anwar Alattar & Caitlin Cottrill & Mark Beecroft, 2021. "Sources and Applications of Emerging Active Travel Data: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "A multi-scale analysis of 27,000 urban street networks: Every US city, town, urbanized area, and Zillow neighborhood," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(4), pages 590-608, May.
    4. Andrea Araldo & Andr'e de Palma & Souhila Arib & Vincent Gauthier & Romain Sere & Youssef Chaabouni & Oussama Kharouaa & Ado Adamou Abba Ari, 2020. "Pooling for First and Last Mile: Integrating Carpooling and Transit," Papers 2010.13438, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    5. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Gang Feng, 2020. "Assessing the Rationality and Walkability of Campus Layouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Margaret Yejide Onanuga & Adebayo Oluwole Eludoyin & Ifeanyi Emmanuel Ofoezie, 2022. "Urbanization and its effects on land and water resources in Ijebuland, southwestern Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 592-616, January.
    7. Jadwiga Biegańska & Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska & Michał Adam Kwiatkowski, 2021. "A Typology of Attitudes towards the E-Bike against the Background of the Traditional Bicycle and the Car," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Padraig Corcoran & Rhyd Lewis, 2023. "A navigability entropy model for street networks," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2171-2186, October.
    9. Perez, Yuri & Pereira, Fabio Henrique, 2021. "Simulation of traffic light disruptions in street networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    10. Yang, Wenyue & Chen, Huiling & Wang, Wulin, 2020. "The path and time efficiency of residents' trips of different purposes with different travel modes: An empirical study in Guangzhou, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Crispin H. V. Cooper & Ian Harvey & Scott Orford & Alain J. F. Chiaradia, 2021. "Using multiple hybrid spatial design network analysis to predict longitudinal effect of a major city centre redevelopment on pedestrian flows," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 643-672, April.
    12. Yat Yen & Pengjun Zhao & Muhammad T Sohail, 2021. "The morphology and circuity of walkable, bikeable, and drivable street networks in Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(1), pages 169-185, January.
    13. Amy K. Hahs & Bertrand Fournier & Myla F. J. Aronson & Charles H. Nilon & Adriana Herrera-Montes & Allyson B. Salisbury & Caragh G. Threlfall & Christine C. Rega-Brodsky & Christopher A. Lepczyk & Fra, 2023. "Urbanisation generates multiple trait syndromes for terrestrial animal taxa worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Boeing, Geoff, 2019. "Street Network Models and Measures for Every U.S. City, County, Urbanized Area, Census Tract, and Zillow-Defined Neighborhood," SocArXiv 7fxjz, Center for Open Science.
    15. Ratzke, Leonie, 2023. "Revealing preferences for urban biodiversity as an environmental good," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    16. Fernando Calderón-Figueroa, 2024. "Residential Micro-Segregation and Social Capital in Lima, Peru," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Beaudet, Chloé & Tardieu, Léa & David, Maia, 2022. "Are citizens willing to accept changes in public lighting for biodiversity conservation?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. John B. Vogler & Jelena Vukomanovic, 2021. "Trends in United States Human Footprint Revealed by New Spatial Metrics of Urbanization and Per Capita Land Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Song, Weize & Yang, Wenqing & Wang, Na & Wang, Can & Li, Zheng & Ou, Yifu & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2024. "How does industrial transformative process shape the spatial dynamics of urban development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Defne Sunguroğlu Hensel, 2020. "Ecological Prototypes: Initiating Design Innovation in Green Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5558-:d:555790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.