IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2976-d342951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factorial Invariance, Latent Mean Differences of the Panas and Affective Profiles and Its Relation to Social Anxiety in Ecuadorian Sample

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Sanmartín

    (Department of Developmental Psychology and Teaching, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain)

  • María Vicent

    (Department of Developmental Psychology and Teaching, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain)

  • Carolina Gonzálvez

    (Department of Developmental Psychology and Teaching, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain)

  • Cándido J. Inglés

    (Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Alicante, Spain)

  • Ramiro Reinoso-Pacheco

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Letters and Sciences of Education, Central University of Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador)

  • José Manuel García-Fernández

    (Department of Developmental Psychology and Teaching, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

Positive (PA) and negative affect (NA) are related with aspects that are part of people’s psychological well-being, and the possibility of combining both dimensions to create four affective profiles, self-fulfilling (high PA and low NA), low affective (low PA and low NA), high affective (high PA and high NA) and self-destructive (low PA and high NA), has recently appeared. The current work aims to validate the short version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in Ecuador, test the existence of the four affective profiles and analyze its relation with social anxiety. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children and the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents was employed in a sample of 1786 Ecuadorian students aged from 15 to 18 years ( M = 16.31, SD = 1.01). The factorial invariance of the scale across sex and age groups was proved and latent mean analyses showed that girls and 18-year-old students obtained the highest scores in negative affect. With regard to the affective profiles, the cluster analyses confirmed the existence of the four mentioned profiles, and the self-fulfilling profile obtained the lowest scores in all the dimensions of social anxiety, whereas the self-destructive profile obtained the highest scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Sanmartín & María Vicent & Carolina Gonzálvez & Cándido J. Inglés & Ramiro Reinoso-Pacheco & José Manuel García-Fernández, 2020. "Factorial Invariance, Latent Mean Differences of the Panas and Affective Profiles and Its Relation to Social Anxiety in Ecuadorian Sample," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2976-:d:342951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2976/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2976/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annamaria Di Fabio & Maureen E. Kenny, 2018. "Academic Relational Civility as a Key Resource for Sustaining Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Danilo Garcia & Saleh Moradi, 2013. "The Affective Temperaments and Well-Being: Swedish and Iranian Adolescents’ Life Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 689-707, April.
    3. Annamaria Di Fabio & Maureen E. Kenny, 2018. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital: A Key Resource for Promoting Well-Being in a Shifting Work Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qinglu Wu & Junfeng Zhao & Guoxiang Zhao & Xiaoming Li & Hongfei Du & Peilian Chi, 2022. "Affective Profiles and Psychosocial Adjustment among Chinese Adolescents and Adults with Adverse Childhood Experiences: A Person-Centered Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 3909-3927, December.
    2. María C. Fuentes & Oscar F. Garcia & Fernando Garcia, 2020. "Protective and Risk Factors for Adolescent Substance Use in Spain: Self-Esteem and Other Indicators of Personal Well-Being and Ill-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giustina Secundo & Elisa De Carlo & Andreina Madaro & Giuseppe Maruccio & Fulvio Signore & Emanuela Ingusci, 2019. "The Impact of Career Insight in the Relation with Social Networks and Career Self-Management: Preliminary Evidences from the Italian Contamination Lab," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Chua Bee Seok & Harris Shah Abd Hamid & Rosnah Ismail, 2019. "Psychometric Properties of the Intrapreneurial Self-Capital Scale in Malaysian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Daniel Shek & Xiang Li, 2016. "Perceived School Performance, Life Satisfaction, and Hopelessness: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study of Adolescents in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 921-934, March.
    4. Annamaria Di Fabio & Maureen E. Kenny, 2018. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital: A Key Resource for Promoting Well-Being in a Shifting Work Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Daniela Pajardi & Monia Vagni & Viviana La Spada & Serena Cubico, 2020. "International Cooperation in Developing Countries: Reducing Fatalism and Promoting Self-Efficacy to Ensure Sustainable Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Daniel Musitu-Ferrer & Celeste León-Moreno & Juan Evaristo Callejas-Jerónimo & Macarena Esteban-Ibáñez & Gonzalo Musitu-Ochoa, 2019. "Relationships between Parental Socialization Styles, Empathy and Connectedness with Nature: Their Implications in Environmentalism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Kailin Cheng & Jiangqun Liao, 2023. "Coping with Coronavirus Pandemic: Risk Perception Predicts Life Optimism," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 351-371, January.
    8. Renee Gibbs & Oya Yerin Güneri & Thomas Pankau & Lynette Bikos, 2020. "Birds of a Feather Fare Less Well Together: Modeling Predictors of International Student Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Agnieszka Bojanowska & Anna M. Zalewska, 2017. "Happy Temperament? Four Types of Stimulation Control Linked to Four Types of Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1403-1423, October.
    10. Veljko Jovanović & Vesna Gavrilov-Jerković, 2016. "The Structure of Adolescent Affective Well-Being: The Case of the PANAS Among Serbian Adolescents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 2097-2117, October.
    11. Annamaria Di Fabio & Akira Tsuda, 2018. "The Psychology of Harmony and Harmonization: Advancing the Perspectives for the Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Weiyan Hu & Siyu Zhang & Yan Song & Tian Liu & Yingchao Lin & Anlu Zhang, 2018. "Effects of Multifunctional Rural Land Use on Residents’ Wellbeing: Evidence from the Xinzhou District of Wuhan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Danilo Garcia & Bibinaz Ghiabi & Patricia Rosenberg & Ali Al Nima & Trevor Archer, 2015. "Differences between affective profiles in temperament and character in Salvadorians: the self-fulfilling experience as a function of agentic (self-directedness) and communal (cooperativeness) values," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 22-37.
    14. Mirko Duradoni & Annamaria Di Fabio, 2019. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital and Sustainable Innovative Behavior within Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, January.
    15. Rushana Khusanova & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2019. "Sustainable Workplace: The Moderating Role of Office Design on the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Feng Kong & Xinyu Gong & Sonia Sajjad & Kairong Yang & Jingjing Zhao, 2019. "How Is Emotional Intelligence Linked to Life Satisfaction? The Mediating Role of Social Support, Positive Affect and Negative Affect," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 2733-2745, December.
    17. Jeanette Engzell, 2023. "Beyond the stereotype of an intrapreneur: an exploratory study of different intrapreneurs and various corporate conditions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Katerina Argyropoulou & Nikolaos Mouratoglou & Alexandros Stamatios Antoniou & Katerina Mikedaki & Argyro Charokopaki, 2020. "Promoting Career Counselors’ Sustainable Career Development through the Group-based Life Construction Dialogue Intervention: “Constructing My Future Purposeful Life”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Mercedes Gómez-López & Carmen Viejo & Eva M. Romera & Rosario Ortega-Ruiz, 2022. "Psychological Well-Being and Social Competence During Adolescence: Longitudinal Association Between the Two Phenomena," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(3), pages 1043-1061, June.
    20. Annamaria Di Fabio & Donald H. Saklofske, 2019. "The Contributions of Personality Traits and Emotional Intelligence to Intrapreneurial Self-Capital: Key Resources for Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2976-:d:342951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.