IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2399-d334303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitability Evaluation of a Train’s Scheduled Section Travel Time

Author

Listed:
  • Maosheng Li

    (School of traffic and transportation engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Qing Huang

    (School of traffic and transportation engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Lixuan Yao

    (School of traffic and transportation engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Yongliang Wang

    (School of traffic and transportation engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

Two methods used to evaluate the suitability of a train’s scheduled section travel time (TSSTT) are theoretical modeling and data analysis. The first is suitable for newly constructed railway projects, the second can reveal the reliability of the train section running time (TSRT) under an instruction of TSSTT in cases where the train operation data are provided. A suitability evaluation method of TSSTT is proposed by calculating the possibility that a train completes a task within the time windows, centering on the TSSTT given in advance. The TSRTs between two adjacent stations are classified into four groups based on whether the train dwells at the two end stations of the railway section, and then subdivided secondly into subgroups by the instruction of TSSTT given. The kurtosis of each subgroup data of TSRT is larger than 3, so Weibull distribution is selected to fit the TSRT distribution of subgroup data due to good fitness based on root measurement of the least square (SRLSM). A busy high-speed railway line in the Wuhan area of China is used to validate the presented approach. Each railway section has its own suitable TSSTT in which TSRT might achieve 96% reliability of arriving within 2.5 minutes centering on suitable TSSTT, otherwise which might not obtain 10% reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Maosheng Li & Qing Huang & Lixuan Yao & Yongliang Wang, 2020. "Suitability Evaluation of a Train’s Scheduled Section Travel Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2399-:d:334303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abril, M. & Barber, F. & Ingolotti, L. & Salido, M.A. & Tormos, P. & Lova, A., 2008. "An assessment of railway capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 774-806, September.
    2. Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor & Helmrich, Mathijn Retel & Vromans, Michiel & Dekker, Rommert, 2008. "Stochastic improvement of cyclic railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 553-570, July.
    3. A. Higgins & E. Kozan, 1998. "Modeling Train Delays in Urban Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 346-357, November.
    4. Goossens, Jan-Willem & van Hoesel, Stan & Kroon, Leo, 2006. "On solving multi-type railway line planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 403-424, January.
    5. Yang, Lixing & Qi, Jianguo & Li, Shukai & Gao, Yuan, 2016. "Collaborative optimization for train scheduling and train stop planning on high-speed railways," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 57-76.
    6. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Shen, Ching-Cheng, 2000. "A multiobjective model for passenger train services planning: application to Taiwan's high-speed rail line," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 91-106, February.
    7. Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2012. "Nominal and robust train timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 727-737.
    8. Ye, Hongbo & Liu, Ronghui, 2016. "A multiphase optimal control method for multi-train control and scheduling on railway lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 377-393.
    9. Espinosa-Aranda, José Luis & García-Ródenas, Ricardo & Ramírez-Flores, María del Carmen & López-García, María Luz & Angulo, Eusebio, 2015. "High-speed railway scheduling based on user preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 772-786.
    10. Albrecht, Amie & Howlett, Phil & Pudney, Peter & Vu, Xuan & Zhou, Peng, 2016. "The key principles of optimal train control—Part 1: Formulation of the model, strategies of optimal type, evolutionary lines, location of optimal switching points," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 482-508.
    11. Huisman, Tijs & Boucherie, Richard J., 2001. "Running times on railway sections with heterogeneous train traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 271-292, March.
    12. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    13. Vansteenwegen, P. & Oudheusden, D. Van, 2006. "Developing railway timetables which guarantee a better service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 337-350, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maosheng Li & Zhengqiu Liu & Yonghong Zhang & Weijun Liu & Feng Shi, 2017. "Distribution analysis of train interval journey time employing the censored model with shifting character," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 715-733, March.
    2. Yin, Jiateng & Yang, Lixing & Tang, Tao & Gao, Ziyou & Ran, Bin, 2017. "Dynamic passenger demand oriented metro train scheduling with energy-efficiency and waiting time minimization: Mixed-integer linear programming approaches," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 182-213.
    3. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Lian, Deheng & Mo, Pengli & D’Ariano, Andrea & Gao, Ziyou & Yang, Lixing, 2024. "Energy-saving time allocation strategy with uncertain dwell times in urban rail transit: Two-stage stochastic model and nested dynamic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 219-242.
    5. Krier, Betty & Liu, Chia-Mei & McNamara, Brian & Sharpe, Jerrod, 2014. "Individual freight effects, capacity utilization, and Amtrak service quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 163-175.
    6. Svetla Stoilova, 2020. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria and Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Establishing the Transport Plan of Intercity Trains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Mo, Pengli & D’Ariano, Andrea & Yang, Lixing & Veelenturf, Lucas P. & Gao, Ziyou, 2021. "An exact method for the integrated optimization of subway lines operation strategies with asymmetric passenger demand and operating costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 283-321.
    8. Liang, Jinpeng & Zang, Guangzhi & Liu, Haitao & Zheng, Jianfeng & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Reducing passenger waiting time in oversaturated metro lines with passenger flow control policy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Högdahl, Johan & Bohlin, Markus & Fröidh, Oskar, 2019. "A combined simulation-optimization approach for minimizing travel time and delays in railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 192-212.
    10. Yan, Fei & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2019. "Combined line planning and train timetabling for strongly heterogeneous railway lines with direct connections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 20-46.
    11. Xin Zhang & Lei Nie & Xin Wu & Yu Ke, 2020. "How to Optimize Train Stops under Diverse Passenger Demand: a New Line Planning Method for Large-Scale High-Speed Rail Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 963-988, December.
    12. Shuo Zhao & Xiwei Mi & Zhenyi Li, 2019. "A Stop-Probability Approach for O-D Service Frequency on High-Speed Railway Lines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Vansteenwegen, Pieter & Dewilde, Thijs & Burggraeve, Sofie & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2016. "An iterative approach for reducing the impact of infrastructure maintenance on the performance of railway systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 39-53.
    14. Qi, Jianguo & Yang, Lixing & Di, Zhen & Li, Shukai & Yang, Kai & Gao, Yuan, 2018. "Integrated optimization for train operation zone and stop plan with passenger distributions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 151-173.
    15. Jiang, Feng & Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2017. "Train timetabling by skip-stop planning in highly congested lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 149-174.
    16. Repolho, Hugo M. & Church, Richard L. & Antunes, António P., 2016. "Optimizing station location and fleet composition for a high-speed rail line," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 437-452.
    17. Cacchiani, Valentina & Qi, Jianguo & Yang, Lixing, 2020. "Robust optimization models for integrated train stop planning and timetabling with passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-29.
    18. Yang, Xin & Chen, Anthony & Ning, Bin & Tang, Tao, 2017. "Bi-objective programming approach for solving the metro timetable optimization problem with dwell time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 22-37.
    19. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    20. Xu, Guangming & Liu, Yihan & Gao, Yihan & Liu, Wei, 2023. "Integrated optimization of train stopping plan and seat allocation scheme for railway systems under equilibrium travel choice and elastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2399-:d:334303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.