IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2375-d333963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on Stochastic DEA Cross-Efficiency with Ordinal Variable and Its Application to Evaluation of Banks’ Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Jinpei Liu

    (School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
    Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Mengdi Fang

    (School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Feifei Jin

    (School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Chengsong Wu

    (School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Huayou Chen

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

Multi-attribute decision making (MADM) is a cognitive process for evaluating data with different attributes in order to select the optimal alternative from a finite number of alternatives. In the real world, a lot of MADM problems involve some random and ordinal variables. Therefore, in this paper, a MADM method based on stochastic data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency with ordinal variable is proposed. First, we develop a stochastic DEA model with ordinal variable, which can derive self-efficiency and the optimal weight of each attribute for all decision making units (DMUs). To further improve its discrimination power, cross-efficiency as a significant extension is proposed, which utilizes peer DMUs’ optimal weight to evaluate the relative efficiency of each alternative. Then, based on self-efficiency and cross-efficiency of all DMUs, we construct corresponding fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) and consistent fuzzy preference relations (FPRs). In addition, we obtain the priority weight vector of all DMUs by utilizing the row wise summation technique according to the consistent FPRs. Finally, we provide a numerical example for evaluating operation performance of sustainable development of 15 listed banks in China, which illustrates the feasibility and applicability of the proposed MADM method based on stochastic DEA cross-efficiency with ordinal variable.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinpei Liu & Mengdi Fang & Feifei Jin & Chengsong Wu & Huayou Chen, 2020. "Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on Stochastic DEA Cross-Efficiency with Ordinal Variable and Its Application to Evaluation of Banks’ Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2375-:d:333963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waqas Munir & Kevin P. Gallagher, 2020. "Scaling Up for Sustainable Development: Benefits and Costs of Expanding and Optimizing Balance Sheet in the Multilateral Development Banks," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 222-243, March.
    2. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    3. Ana Aleksić & Ivana Načinović Braje & Sanda Rašić Jelavić, 2019. "Creating Sustainable Work Environments by Developing Cultures that Diminish Deviance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Jin, Jingliang & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Peng, 2014. "Measuring environmental performance with stochastic environmental DEA: The case of APEC economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 80-86.
    5. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2000. "Stochastic DEA for restructure strategy: an application to a Japanese petroleum company," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 385-398, August.
    6. Li, Yongjun & Lei, Xiyang & Dai, Qianzhi & Liang, Liang, 2015. "Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 964-973.
    7. Wu, Desheng (Dash) & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2010. "Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1679-1688, December.
    8. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2019. "Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 364-375.
    9. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Huang, Z. M. & Sun, D. B., 1990. "Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1-2), pages 73-91.
    10. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 217-234, Springer.
    11. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    12. Goodland, Robert, 1997. "Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 189-200, December.
    13. Dobos, Imre & Vörösmarty, Gyöngyi, 2019. "Inventory-related costs in green supplier selection problems with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 374-380.
    14. Jradi, Samah & Ruggiero, John, 2019. "Stochastic data envelopment analysis: A quantile regression approach to estimate the production frontier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 385-393.
    15. Wu, Desheng Dash, 2009. "Performance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 227-235, April.
    16. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    17. C Kao & H-T Hung, 2005. "Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(10), pages 1196-1203, October.
    18. An, Qingxian & Chen, Haoxun & Xiong, Beibei & Wu, Jie & Liang, Liang, 2017. "Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 49-59.
    19. Jian Xue & Di Zhu & Laijun Zhao & Chenchen Wang & Hongyang Li, 2019. "Redundancy Identification and Optimization Scheme of Branches for Sustainable Operation of Commercial Banks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Emrouznejad, Ali & Parker, Barnett R. & Tavares, Gabriel, 2008. "Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 151-157, September.
    21. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1963. "Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 18-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khodadadipour, M. & Hadi-Vencheh, A. & Behzadi, M.H. & Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., 2021. "Undesirable factors in stochastic DEA cross-efficiency evaluation: An application to thermal power plant energy efficiency," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 613-628.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Desheng (Dash) & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2010. "Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1679-1688, December.
    2. Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano & Vicente J. Bolós, 2021. "deaR-Shiny: An Interactive Web App for Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Ramin Gharizadeh Beiragh & Reza Alizadeh & Saeid Shafiei Kaleibari & Fausto Cavallaro & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Romualdas Bausys & Abbas Mardani, 2020. "An integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainability Performance Assessment for Insurance Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Helmi Hammami & Thanh Ngo & David Tripe & Dinh-Tri Vo, 2022. "Ranking with a Euclidean common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: with application to the Eurozone banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 675-694, April.
    5. Meng, Fanyong & Xiong, Beibei, 2021. "Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 622-632.
    6. Jorge Guardiola & Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo, 2013. "Weighting life domains with Data Envelopment Analysis," Working Papers 1311, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    7. Dariush Akbarian, 2015. "Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-10, January.
    8. Taylan G. Topcu & Konstantinos Triantis, 2022. "An ex-ante DEA method for representing contextual uncertainties and stakeholder risk preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 395-423, February.
    9. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Adel Hatami-Marbini & Ali Emrouznejad & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2020. "Chance-constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1863-1898, September.
    10. Ghasemi, M.-R. & Ignatius, Joshua & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2014. "A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 640-650.
    11. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2021. "A joint chance-constrained data envelopment analysis model with random output data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1255-1277, June.
    12. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.
    13. Jorge Guardiola & Andrés Picazo-Tadeo, 2014. "Building Weighted-Domain Composite Indices of Life Satisfaction with Data Envelopment Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 257-274, May.
    14. Mohammad Izadikhah & Reza Farzipoor Saen, 2020. "Ranking sustainable suppliers by context-dependent data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 607-637, October.
    15. Dinesh R. Pai & Fatma Pakdil & Nasibeh Azadeh-Fard, 2024. "Applications of data envelopment analysis in acute care hospitals: a systematic literature review, 1984–2022," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 284-312, June.
    16. Pankaj Dutta & Bharath Jaikumar & Manpreet Singh Arora, 2022. "Applications of data envelopment analysis in supplier selection between 2000 and 2020: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1399-1454, August.
    17. Marcel Clermont & Julia Schaefer, 2019. "Identification of Outliers in Data Envelopment Analysis," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 71(4), pages 475-496, October.
    18. Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2023. "Foundations of operations research: From linear programming to data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1069-1080.
    19. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Siavash Hekmat & Per J. Agrell, 2022. "A strategy-based framework for supplier selection: a grey PCA-DEA approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 263-297, March.
    20. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2375-:d:333963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.