IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p914-d313279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seismic Resilience Enhancement of Urban Water Distribution System Using Restoration Priority of Pipeline Damages

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao Han

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Donghui Ma

    (Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Benwei Hou

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

The malfunction of the water distribution system (WDS) following severe earthquakes have significant impacts on the post-earthquake rescue. Moreover, the restoration priority of earthquake-induced pipeline damages plays an important role in improving the post-earthquake serviceability of WDS and the “seismic resilience”. Thus, to enhance the seismic resilience of WDS, this study develops a dynamic cost-benefit method and introduces three existing methods to determine the restoration priority of pipeline damages based on a quantitative resilience evaluation framework. In this resilience evaluation framework, the restoration priority is firstly determined. Then the time-varying performance of post-earthquake WDS is modeled as a discrete event dynamic system. In this model, the system state changes after the reparation of pipeline damage, and the system performance is simulated by a hydraulic model to be consistent with the system state. In this study, this method is also tested and compared with other existing methods, and the results show that the system resilience corresponding to the restoration priority obtained by this method is close to that obtained by the global optimization method with a relative difference of less than 3%, whereas the calculation complexity is about 0.4% of the optimization model. It is concluded that this proposed method is valid.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao Han & Donghui Ma & Benwei Hou & Wei Wang, 2020. "Seismic Resilience Enhancement of Urban Water Distribution System Using Restoration Priority of Pipeline Damages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:914-:d:313279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ouyang, Min & Wang, Zhenghua, 2015. "Resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems: With a focus on joint restoration modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 74-82.
    2. Jeongwook Choi & Do Guen Yoo & Doosun Kang, 2018. "Post-Earthquake Restoration Simulation Model for Water Supply Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Adachi, Takao & Ellingwood, Bruce R., 2008. "Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 78-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chan-Wook Lee & Do-Guen Yoo, 2023. "Comparative Study on Strategies for the Division of Earthquake-Proof Strengthening Segments to Reinforce the Reliability of Water Supply Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Ao & Wang, Xiaowei & Xie, Yazhou & Dong, You, 2023. "Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: Methodological development, applicability, and future research needs – An earthquake engineering perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1119-1136.
    3. Ouyang, Min, 2016. "Critical location identification and vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 106-116.
    4. Ouyang, Min & Liu, Chuang & Wu, Shengyu, 2020. "Worst-case vulnerability assessment and mitigation model of urban utility tunnels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Chan-Wook Lee & Do-Guen Yoo, 2023. "Comparative Study on Strategies for the Division of Earthquake-Proof Strengthening Segments to Reinforce the Reliability of Water Supply Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Ouyang, Min, 2017. "A mathematical framework to optimize resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1072-1084.
    7. Na, Ung Jin & Shinozuka, Masanobu, 2009. "Simulation-based seismic loss estimation of seaport transportation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 722-731.
    8. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Zio, Enrico & Wang, Yanhui & Small, Michael & Li, Man, 2023. "Improving resilience of high-speed train by optimizing repair strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Pei, Shunshun & Zhai, Changhai & Hu, Jie, 2024. "Surrogate model-assisted seismic resilience assessment of the interdependent transportation and healthcare system considering a two-stage recovery strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    11. Yang, Bofan & Zhang, Lin & Zhang, Bo & Xiang, Yang & An, Lei & Wang, Wenfeng, 2022. "Complex equipment system resilience: Composition, measurement and element analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Jeongwook Choi & Doosun Kang, 2020. "Improved Hydraulic Simulation of Valve Layout Effects on Post-Earthquake Restoration of a Water Distribution Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Mahsa Ghandi & Abbas Roozbahani, 2020. "Risk Management of Drinking Water Supply in Critical Conditions Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE V Technique," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 595-615, January.
    15. Yu, Juanya & Sharma, Neetesh & Gardoni, Paolo, 2024. "Functional connectivity analysis for modeling flow in infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    16. Liu, Huan & Tatano, Hirokazu & Pflug, Georg & Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan, 2021. "Post-disaster recovery in industrial sectors: A Markov process analysis of multiple lifeline disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Sungsik Yoon & Young-Joo Lee & Hyung-Jo Jung, 2021. "Flow-based seismic risk assessment of a water transmission network employing probabilistic seismic hazard analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(2), pages 1231-1254, January.
    18. Kim, Youngsuk & Kang, Won-Hee, 2013. "Network reliability analysis of complex systems using a non-simulation-based method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 80-88.
    19. Maddah, Negin & Heydari, Babak, 2024. "Building back better: Modeling decentralized recovery in sociotechnical systems using strategic network dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. George-Williams, Hindolo & Patelli, Edoardo, 2017. "Efficient availability assessment of reconfigurable multi-state systems with interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 431-444.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:914-:d:313279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.