IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1134-d316794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Right Amount of Technology in School Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Auer

    (Chair for Building Technology and Climate Responsive Design, Faculty of Architecture, Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Philipp Vohlidka

    (Chair for Building Technology and Climate Responsive Design, Faculty of Architecture, Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Christine Zettelmeier

    (Chair for Building Technology and Climate Responsive Design, Faculty of Architecture, Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

What is an adequate school building nowadays and which amount of technology does it need? How high is the indoor comfort in terms of thermal, visual, hygienic, and acoustical comfort? Are there technical aspects that stand out to other solutions? How do users feel and act in the buildings? For this purpose, the Chair compared, in total, twelve selected modern, older, and renovated school buildings from different building age groups. For the comparison, it was essential to intensively analyze each of the twelve schools. This included visiting the schools, talking with the participating architects, specialist planners, builders, and school managers, procuring and analyzing planning documents and, where available, publications and reports, performing simulations and measurements in the classrooms, and surveying the buildings’ users. The predominant energy demand in schools is the energy expenditure for heating and cooling the air, especially for heating the air in the winter. Nevertheless, it turns out that from a purely energy-focused perspective, mechanical ventilation cannot be justified. It is also evident that transmission heat losses play a negligible role in school construction, which is why the “passive house” as a goal for renovations must be called into question.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Auer & Philipp Vohlidka & Christine Zettelmeier, 2020. "The Right Amount of Technology in School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1134-:d:316794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giacomo Chiesa & Andrea Acquaviva & Mario Grosso & Lorenzo Bottaccioli & Maurizio Floridia & Edoardo Pristeri & Edoardo Maria Sanna, 2019. "Parametric Optimization of Window-to-Wall Ratio for Passive Buildings Adopting A Scripting Methodology to Dynamic-Energy Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristijan Lavtižar & Alenka Fikfak & Rok Fink, 2023. "Overlooked Impacts of Urban Environments on the Air Quality in Naturally Ventilated Schools Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Hiba Najini & Mutasim Nour & Sulaiman Al-Zuhair & Fadi Ghaith, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Green Building Codes in United Arab Emirates Based on a Case Study Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pajek, Luka & Košir, Mitja, 2021. "Strategy for achieving long-term energy efficiency of European single-family buildings through passive climate adaptation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    2. Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Omrane Benjeddou, 2021. "Impact of Window to Wall Ratio on Energy Loads in Hot Regions: A Study of Building Energy Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. ChungYeon Won & SangTae No & Qamar Alhadidi, 2019. "Factors Affecting Energy Performance of Large-Scale Office Buildings: Analysis of Benchmarking Data from New York City and Chicago," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Giacomo Chiesa & Francesca Fasano & Paolo Grasso, 2021. "A New Tool for Building Energy Optimization: First Round of Successful Dynamic Model Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Qiong He & S. Thomas Ng & Md. Uzzal Hossain & Martin Skitmore, 2019. "Energy-Efficient Window Retrofit for High-Rise Residential Buildings in Different Climatic Zones of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Yao Lu & Hankun Lin & Siwei Liu & Yiqiang Xiao, 2019. "Nonuniform Woven Solar Shading Screens: Shading, Mechanical, and Daylighting Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Martina Dell’Unto & Louise-Nour Sassenou & Lorenzo Olivieri & Francesca Olivieri, 2023. "Technical Feasibility for the Boosting of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Existing Mediterranean Districts: A Methodology and Case Study in Alcorcón, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Henriqueta Teixeira & Maria da Glória Gomes & António Moret Rodrigues & Júlia Pereira, 2021. "In-Service Thermal and Luminous Performance Monitoring of a Refurbished Building with Solar Control Films on the Glazing System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1134-:d:316794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.