IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1084-d316014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threatened Status Assessment of Multiple Grassland Ecosystems and Conservation Strategies in the Xilin River Basin, NE China

Author

Listed:
  • Xia Meng

    (College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
    Department of Ecosystem & Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Huasheng Huang

    (Department of Ecosystem & Landscape Dynamics, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Luo Guo

    (College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Dan Wang

    (College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Rui Han

    (College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Kexin Zhou

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China)

Abstract

The Red List of Ecosystems, proposed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature can determine the status of ecosystems for biodiversity conservation. In this study, we applied the Red List of Ecosystems Categories and Criteria 2.0 with its four major criteria (A, B, C, and D) to assess twelve dominant ecosystems in the Xilin River Basin, a representative grassland-dominating area in China. We employed Geographical Information Systems and remote sensing to process the obtained satellite products from the years 2000 to 2015, and generated indicators for biological processes and degradation of environment with boreal ecosystem productivity simulator. The results show that all twelve ecosystems in the Xilin River Basin confront varying threats: Artemisia frigida grassland and Festuca ovina grassland face the highest risk of collapse, sharing an endangered status; Filifolium sibiricum meadow grassland and Leymus chinensis grassland have a least concern status, while the remaining eight ecosystems display a vulnerable status. This study overcomes the limits of data deficiency by introducing the boreal ecosystem productivity simulator to simulate biological processes and the plant–environment interaction. It sheds light on further application of the Red List of Ecosystems, and bridges the research gap and promote local ecosystems conservation in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xia Meng & Huasheng Huang & Luo Guo & Dan Wang & Rui Han & Kexin Zhou, 2020. "Threatened Status Assessment of Multiple Grassland Ecosystems and Conservation Strategies in the Xilin River Basin, NE China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1084-:d:316014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1084/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1084/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuefeng Zhang & Jianming Niu & Alexander Buyantuev & Qing Zhang & Jianjun Dong & Sarula Kang & Jing Zhang, 2016. "Understanding Grassland Degradation and Restoration from the Perspective of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Xilin River Basin in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi & Akila Sarirete, 2019. "Clustering Smart City Services: Perceptions, Expectations, Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Zhang & Xueming Li & Alexander Buyantuev & Tongliga Bao & Xuefeng Zhang, 2019. "How Do Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Change in the Long Period? The Case Study of Uxin, Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Yunfeng Hu & Batu Nacun, 2018. "An Analysis of Land-Use Change and Grassland Degradation from a Policy Perspective in Inner Mongolia, China, 1990–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Su-Yen Chen & Chiachun Lee, 2019. "Perceptions of the Impact of High-Level-Machine-Intelligence from University Students in Taiwan: The Case for Human Professions, Autonomous Vehicles, and Smart Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Mona Treude, 2021. "Sustainable Smart City—Opening a Black Box," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Marcos Nahuel Martínez Stanziani, 2020. "Índices de Ciudades Inteligentes: construcción y análisis de un indicador para la ciudad de Bahía Blanca," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4374, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    6. Hejie Wei & Weiguo Fan & Zhenyu Ding & Boqi Weng & Kaixiong Xing & Xuechao Wang & Nachuan Lu & Sergio Ulgiati & Xiaobin Dong, 2017. "Ecosystem Services and Ecological Restoration in the Northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau, China, in Relation to Climate Fluctuation and Investments in Natural Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Alessandro Crivellari & Euro Beinat, 2020. "Forecasting Spatially-Distributed Urban Traffic Volumes via Multi-Target LSTM-Based Neural Network Regressor," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Yuwei Wang & Zhenyu Wang & Ruren Li & Xiaoliang Meng & Xingjun Ju & Yuguo Zhao & Zongyao Sha, 2018. "Comparison of Modeling Grassland Degradation with and without Considering Localized Spatial Associations in Vegetation Changing Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Yang Liu & Qing Zhang & Qingfu Liu & Yongzhi Yan & Wanxin Hei & Deyong Yu & Jianguo Wu, 2020. "Different Household Livelihood Strategies and Influencing Factors in the Inner Mongolian Grassland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Mariane Paulina Batalha Roque & José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto & André Luiz Lopes Faria, 2022. "Degraded grassland and the conflict of land use in protected areas of hotspot in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1475-1492, January.
    11. Hailing Xu & Jianghong Zhu & Zhanqi Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Pattern of Urban Block Development Based on POI Analysis: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Qian Li & Xuefeng Zhang & Qingfu Liu & Yang Liu & Yong Ding & Qing Zhang, 2017. "Impact of Land Use Intensity on Ecosystem Services: An Example from the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Central Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    13. Liqun Shao & Haibin Chen & Chen Zhang & Xuexi Huo, 2017. "Effects of Major Grassland Conservation Programs Implemented in Inner Mongolia since 2000 on Vegetation Restoration and Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbances to Their Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Anna Visvizi & Shahira Assem Abdel-Razek & Roman Wosiek & Radosław Malik, 2021. "Conceptualizing Walking and Walkability in the Smart City through a Model Composite w 2 Smart City Utility Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Lina Wang & Enyi Yu & Shuang Li & Xiao Fu & Gang Wu, 2021. "Analysis of Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ulansuhai Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Alessandro Crivellari & Euro Beinat, 2020. "LSTM-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Individual Mobility Traces of Short-Term Foreign Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Bernd W. Wirtz & Marcel Becker & Florian W. Schmidt, 2022. "Smart city services: an empirical analysis of citizen preferences," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1063-1080, December.
    18. Radosław Malik & Anna Visvizi & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi, 2022. "Smart Services in Smart Cities: Insights from Science Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2023. "The Global Whitewashing of Smart Cities: Citizens’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Tu Peng & Xu Yang & Zi Xu & Yu Liang, 2020. "Constructing an Environmental Friendly Low-Carbon-Emission Intelligent Transportation System Based on Big Data and Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1084-:d:316014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.